Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T14CM05980
Parcel: 14027043J

Address:
6221 S TUCSON BL

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T14CM05980
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/12/2014 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Development Package must be approved first.
09/16/2014 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Reqs Change Plans need to indicate the location of all existing and proposed fire hydrants, proposed FDC location and note what type of storage will be in the building. The height and method of storage (rack,etc) needs to be noted. If high-piled storage is going to be the type of storage, then additional requirements are necessary.
09/18/2014 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. SHEET T-2; PROJECT DATA (APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES): THE ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS FOR THIS PROJECT FOLLOW THE 2009 ICC/ANSI A117.1. REVISE THE NOTE.
2. SHEET A1.4; DETAIL 10: THE DISTANCE FROM FINISH GRADE OR CONCRETE TO THE BOTTOM OF THE PARKING SIGN SHALL BE 7'-0". REVISE.
3. SHEET A1.4; DETAIL 6: PROVIDE THE SIZE OF THE BOLLARD FOUNDATION.
4. SHEET A1.5; APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE: THE ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS FOR THIS PROJECT FOLLOW THE 2009 ICC/ANSI A117.1. REVISE THE NOTE.
5. SHEET A1.5; CODE ANALYSIS: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE VERBIAGE.
6. SHEET A2.0: DARKEN THE NOTES AND THE PLANS.
7. SHEET A2.0: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE ROOM DESCRIPTIONS ON THE PLAN.
8. SHEET A2.0; FLOOR PLAN: KEY NOTE 7 IDENTIFIES A KNOX BOX. THE PLAN INDICATES TWO SEPARATE LOCATIONS FOR THIS NOTE. REMOVE NOTE 7 ON THE PLAN NEAR THE OFFICE ENTRY.
9. SHEET A2.0; KEY NOTES: NOTE 6 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
10. SHEET A2.0 (FLOOR PLAN); WALL TYPE LEGEND: THE DOUBLE STUD WALL BETWEEN THE RESTROOM IS NOT IDENTIFIED AS TO WALL TYPE. IS THIS TWO SEPARATE 'E' TYPE WALLS? CLARIFY ON THE PLAN.
11. SHEET A2.1; ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN A: DARKEN THE 5'-0" TURNING RADIUS ON THE PLAN.
12. SHEET A2.2 (ROOF PLAN); KEY NOTES: NOTE 9 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
13. SHEET A4.0: DARKEN THE NOTES AND THE SECTIONS.
14. SHEET A5.0: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE ROOM DESCRIPTIONS ON THE PLAN.
15. SHEET A7.2: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE DETAIL 8 VERBIAGE AND DIMENSIONS.
16. SHEET S1-0: DARKEN THE TITLE BLOCK AND GENERAL NOTE HEADERS.
17. SHEET S2-0: DARKEN THE TITLE BLOCK, NOTES, SCHEDULES, AND PLANS.
18. SHEET S3-0: DARKEN THE TITLE BLOCK, KEY NOTES, AND PLANS.
19. SHEETS S4-0, S4-1, S5-0, AND S5-1: DARKEN THE TITLE BLOCK AND DETAILS.
20. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
09/24/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide a design for the mounting shelf for the water heater along with structural calculations to show that the water heater is safely supported. Reference: Section 301.2, IPC 2012.
2. Provide the number of drinking fountains that complies with the requirements of Section 1109.5.1, IBC 2012 and Section 410.2, IPC 2012.
3. Provide tempered water for the lavatories and public hand-washing sinks in restrooms using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012.
4. The COMcheck Mechanical Compliance Certificate on sheet P2.0 is illegible. Either enlarge the image on the drawing or submit the document on 8.5"x 11" paper. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
09/24/2014 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Completed
09/25/2014 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. The COMcheck Mechanical Compliance Certificate on sheet M3.0 is illegible. Either enlarge the image on the drawing or submit the document on 8.5"x 11" paper. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
2. Provide energy code compliance calculations (e.g. COMcheck) for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation, the NFRC fenestration product ratings, and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C103.2, C303.1.3 (1), C303.1.3 (2), and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.
3. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012.
4. Describe the activities that occur in room 110 (Testing) that support using the same ventilation rate used for an office. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2012.
5. Units AC-1 and AC-2 supply multiple zones; determine the minimum required ventilation using Sections 403.3.2.3.1 through 403.3.2.3.4, IMC 2012. Since room 108 (Storage) uses air transferred from room 100 for its ventilation, include the ventilation for room 108 in the calculations. Verify that sufficient outside air is being taken in by the HVAC units to supply the minimum ventilation requirements. Reference: Sections 403.1, 403.2.2, and 403.3.2.3, IMC 2012.
6. Verify that the distribution of supply air from the HVAC units during the heating season complies with the requirements of footnote (g) of Table 403.3.1.2, IMC 2012 or use a zone air distribution effectiveness value of 0.8 for the ventilation calculations. Reference: Section 403.3.1.2, IMC 2012.
09/25/2014 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Certex
T14CM05980
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 26, 2014

1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve until a development package has been approved.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956
09/26/2014 LEERAY HANLY ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change ERRATA: The electrical design is approved, sheet E0.1 electrical specifications do not meet the City of Tucson minimum font size of 3/32". Please re-format this sheet.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/05/2014 AROMERO4 APPROVAL SHELF Completed
11/05/2014 AROMERO4 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
11/05/2014 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed