Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T14CM05877
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/26/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. TWO SETS OF THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE. |
| 12/05/2014 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP14-0152 must be approved prior to approval of the building plan package. ENG will stamp the building plan approved once it is verified that the layout matches the approved DP Package. JG |
| 12/11/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. No site plan was included in this submittal. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to the building, building sewer, site lighting, or electrical service to the building). [Initial comment: Provide a site utility drawing. Show the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure principle backflow preventer assembly. Show the location of the proposed gravity grease interceptor, the size, route, and slope of the building sewer, the location of all cleanouts in the building sewer, and the location of the connection of the building sewer to the public sewer. Coordinate the location of the connections of the building drain and the gravity grease interceptor with the building sewer. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 2. Sheet M101 appears to show three vents from the water heater; clarify the drawing. [Initial comment: Clarify the type of direct vent configuration to be used with the water heater: concentric vents or parallel intake/exhaust vents as shown on roof plan 1/M101 and in detail 4/M602. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 3. Calculations not found in this submittal. [Initial comment: Provide calculations showing how the PEX water supply tubing has been sized. Reference: Sections 604.1 and 604.3, IPC 201.] 4. Revise the gravity grease interceptor sizing calculations to include only those fixtures shown on the plans that will pass through the interceptor (e.g. no water closets, etc). [Initial comment: Provide sizing calculations for the gravity grease interceptor. Reference: Section 1003.3, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.] 5. The total flow for 1822 MBH of natural gas with a heating value of 1,000 BTU/cubic foot is 1822 CFH, not 2051 CFH. [Initial comment: Note: Southwest Gas, the local gas utility, provides natural gas with an energy content of approximately 1,000 BTU per cubic foot. Reference: Section 402.1, IFGC 2012.] 6. Detail 6/M601 shows the termination of a plumbing vent, not a gravity vent from a gas-fired appliance. See keynote 4 on sheet M101for locations of gravity vents. [Initial comment: Show that the terminations of the gravity vents for the gas-fired appliances and the fireplace comply with the requirements of Section 503.6.4 (1), IFGC 2012.] |
| 12/11/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Keynote 15 on sheet P201has been removed but detail 1 on sheet M602 still shows a 1-1/2" reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly installed in the building. If this assembly is to be retained, add its pressure drop to the water pressure calculations. [Initial comment: Keynote 15 on the plumbing floor plan (P201) calls for a "pressure reducing backflow prevention device" to be installed inside of the fire riser room. If you are referring to a reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly and if it is intended to protect the municipal water distribution system from the activities taking place in this building, it is required to be installed at a location accessible to Tucson Water. Coordinate the location of the assembly with the civil engineer; the utility drawing of the development package (C2.0) shows a 1-1/2" reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly being installed at the western property line for the site, just downstream of the 1-1/2" water meter. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf] |
| 12/15/2014 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Zoning has reviewed the building plans to ensure compliance with the ongoing review of the Development Package. While the building plans are in substantial compliance with the current version of the DP, Zoning cannot approve the building plans until the Development Package is approved and all building review agencies have approved the building plans. |
| 12/15/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. If the NFRC certification numbers are not shown on the envelope compliance certificate, the default U-factor and SHGC values from Tables C303.1.3 (1) and C303.1.3 (2), IECC 2012 must be used to determine if the activity complies with the requirements of the IECC. [Initial comment: Provide the NFRC certification number for the U-factor and the Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC) of the fenestration on COMcheck or use the appropriate default U-factor and SHGC values from Tables C303.1.3 (1) and C303.1.3 (2), IECC 2012. Coordinate the U-factor and the SHGC values shown on the COMcheck Envelope Compliance Certificate with the window descriptions shown on the drawings. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IEC 2012.] 2. The revision to sheet WP201 appears to show the two 1" drains from the make up air unit, not the three rooftop units. Provide clear drawings showing the size route, and termination of the condensate drains from the rooftop units. [Initial comment: Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson.] |
| 12/17/2014 | KEN VAN KARSEN | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T14CM05877 A Registered Electrical Engineer seal is required (all electrical sheets) when the design exceeds 400 amps. 1. Provide a fault current analysis with AIC entries at the service entrance and each panel. Notate the AIC rating of new equipment, NEC 110.24. Ken Van Karsen Electrical Plan Review PDSD, City of Tucson 520-837-4912 Kenneth.VanKarsen@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/05/2015 | SHANAE POWELL | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/05/2015 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |