Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T14CM05727
Parcel: 133165760

Address:
2040 N WILMOT RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T14CM05727
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/04/2014 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Approved
09/04/2014 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. SHEETS A-000-01 AND A-091-72; APPLICABLE CODES: REVISE THE ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES TO THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009 EDITION. REMOVE THE ADA (ADAAG) REFERENCE.
2. SHEET A-000-01 (PATIENT UNIT DATA); SHEET A-091-72 (PROJECT DATA): SHEET 01 INDICATES 87 TOTAL PATIENT UNITS, WHILE SHEET 72 INDICATES 92. CLARIFY.
3. SHEETS A-091-72 AND A-092-73; WALL PARTITION TYPE LEGEND: SHOULD THE WALL TYPES AT THE STAIRS BE INDICATED IN THE LEGEND? VERIFY.
4. SHEET A-092-73; OCCUPANT LOAD: REFERENCE IS MADE TO TABLE 1004.1.1 FOR THE FLOOR AREA ALLOWANCE PER OCCUPANT. REVISE THE REFERENCE TO TABLE 1004.1.2.
5. SHEET A-092-73; OCCUPANT LOAD TABLE; PLUMBING REQUIREMENTS TABLE: THE PLUMBING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE FIRST FLOOR A-2 OCCUPANCY INDICATES 85 MEN AND 85 WOMEN (170 TOTAL), WHILE THE OCCUPANT LOAD TABLE INDICATES 193 TOTAL. CLARIFY.
6. SHEET A-092-73; OCCUPANT LOAD TABLE; PLUMBING REQUIREMENTS TABLE: THE PLUMBING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE FIRST FLOOR B OCCUPANCY INDICATES 128 TOTAL OCCUPANTS, WHILE THE OCCUPANT LOAD TABLE INDICATES 93 TOTAL. CLARIFY.
7. SHEET A-092-73; OCCUPANT LOAD TABLE; PLUMBING REQUIREMENTS TABLE: THE PLUMBING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SECOND FLOOR S OCCUPANCY INDICATES 5 TOTAL OCCUPANTS, WHILE THE OCCUPANT LOAD TABLE INDICATES 37 TOTAL. CLARIFY.
8. SHEET A-092-73; PLUMBING REQUIREMENTS TABLE: INDICATE THE SECOND FLOOR IN THE TABLE.
9. SHEET A-092-73; PLUMBING REQUIREMENTS TABLE: REFERENCE THE 2012 IPC AND APPROPRIATE SECTIONS IN THE NOTES AT THE BOTTOM OF THE TABLE.
10. SHEET A-092-73; PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNT TABLE: PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON THE DRAWINGS INDICATING HOW THE NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES AND VISITORS WAS DETERMINED, LEADING TO THE REQUIRED WATER CLOSETS, LAVATORIES, AND DRINKING FOUNTAINS FOR THE FACILITY.
11. SHEET A-092-73; MEANS OF EGRESS TABLE: ON THE SECOND ENTRY OF THE TABLE (MINIMUM EXIT ACCESS WIDTH), ADD THE WORD 'CORRIDORS'.
12. SHEET A-092-73; MEANS OF EGRESS TABLE: ON THE FOURTH ENTRY OF THE TABLE (SUITES), REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE IBC SECTION 1014.2.2 (3 TIMES). REVISE THAT REFERENCE TO THE 2012 IBC (SECTION 407.4.3).
13. SHEET A-092-73; MEANS OF EGRESS TABLE: ON THE SIXTH ENTRY OF THE TABLE (POWER OPERATED DOORS), REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE IBC SECTION 1008.1.3.2. REVISE THAT REFERENCE.
14. SHEET A-092-73; MEANS OF EGRESS TABLE: ON THE SEVENTH ENTRY OF THE TABLE (HORIZONTAL SLIDING DOORS), ADD THE REFERENCE 1008.1.4.3 FOR THE SLIDING DOOR CRITERIA.
15. SHEET A-092-73; SEPARATIONS TABLE: ON THE FIRST ENTRY OF THE TABLE (OCCUPANCY SEPARATION), REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE IBC TABLE 508.3.3, SECTION 508.3.3.4, AND SECTION 706. REVISE THOSE REFERENCES.
16. SHEET A-092-73; SEPARATIONS TABLE: ON THE SECOND ENTRY OF THE TABLE (SUBDIVISION OF BUILDING SPACE), REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE IBC SECTION 407.4. REVISE THAT REFERENCE.
17. SHEET A-092-73; SEPARATIONS TABLE: ON THE SECOND ENTRY OF THE TABLE (SUBDIVISION OF BUILDING SPACE), THE STATEMENT MADE ALLOWS A MAXIMUM OF 22,500 SF PER SMOKE COMPARTMENT. THE SMOKE ZONE 2-2 ON THIS SHEET INDICATES 26,822 SF. CLARIFY.
18. SHEET A-092-73; SEPARATIONS TABLE: ON THE FOURTH ENTRY OF THE TABLE (SMOKE COMPARTMENTS), REVISE THE REFERENCE TO THE IBC SECTION 407.4.
19. SHEET A-092-73; SEPARATIONS TABLE: ON THE FOURTH ENTRY OF THE TABLE (SMOKE COMPARTMENTS), CLARIFY ACTUAL SMOKE ZONE 2-2 SF OF 26,822 TO THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SF OF 22,500.
20. SHEET A-092-73; SEPARATIONS TABLE: ON THE FIFTH ENTRY OF THE TABLE (SHAFT ENCLOSURES), REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE IBC SECTION 707.4. REVISE THAT REFERENCE.
21. SHEET A-092-73; SEPARATIONS TABLE: ON THE SEVENTH ENTRY OF THE TABLE (BOILERS/FURNACE ROOMS), REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE IBC SECTION 508.2.2.1 AND TABLE 508.2. REVISE THOSE REFERENCES.
22. SHEET A-092-73; SEPARATIONS TABLE: ON THE EIGHTH ENTRY OF THE TABLE (WASTE AND LINEN COLLECTION ROOMS), REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE IBC TABLE 508.2. REVISE THAT REFERENCE.
23. SHEET A-092-73; SEPARATIONS TABLE: ON THE TENTH ENTRY OF THE TABLE (STORAGE ROOM OVER 100 SF), REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE IBC SECTION 508.2.2.1 AND TABLE 508.2. REVISE THOSE REFERENCES.
24. SHEET A-103-78; PLAN B1: STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND DETAILS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE LONG TERM BICYCLE PARKING BUILDING. A NOTE ON THIS SHEET (SECTION F1) INDICATES TO REFER TO THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR THE FOOTINGS. VERIFY.
25. SHEET A-103.1-79; PLAN B1: STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND DETAILS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE EXTERIOR STORAGE BUILDING. PROVIDE.
26. SHEET A-105-81; DETAIL H1: STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND DETAILS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE GENERATOR/CART WASH WALL. PROVIDE.
27. SHEETS A-110-82 AND A-120-87; ACOUSTIC LEGEND: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE VERBIAGE.
28. SHEET A-110-82 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A-200-100 (ELEVATIONS B1 AND E1): THE TITLES OF THESE TWO ELEVATIONS SHOULD BE REVERSED.
29. SHEET A-131-91; DETAILS G2 AND B5: INDICATE HOW THE METAL STUDS ABOVE THE ROOF ARE CONNECTED AT THE BASE.
30. SHEET A-131-91; SECTION D1 AND ELEVATION B1: INDICATE AT THE U-BRACKETS THE SIZE OF THE BACKING MEMBER IN THE WALL, HOW THE U-BRACKET IS CONNECTED TO THAT MEMBER, AND HOW THE U-BRACKET IS CONNECTED TO THE LADDER STRINGER.
31. SHEET A-150-92; REFLECTED CEILING PLAN: WHAT DO THE CLOUDED AREAS INDICATE ON THE PLAN? REMOVE AS REQUIRED.
32. SHEETS A-152-94, A-153-95, AND A-154-96; PLANS: WHAT DO THE CLOUDED AREAS INDICATE ON THE PLANS? REMOVE AS REQUIRED.
33. SHEET A-200-100; ELEVATION E3: COMPLETE THE ENLARGED ELEVATION REFERENCE AT THE EXTERIOR STORAGE.
34. SHEET A-300-104 (BUILDING SECTION E1); SHEET A-311-107 (WALL SECTION B1): THE ENLARGED WALL SECTION REFERENCE ON THE BUILDING SECTION E1 INCLUDES THE ENTIRE PORCH AREA, WHILE THE WALL SECTION B1 INCLUDES ONLY THE TWO STORY WALL. CLARIFY.
35. SHEET A-314-110; WALL SECTION G1: THE DETAIL CUT AT THE WINDOW REFERENCES B4.1. REVISE THE REFERENCE, OR ADD DETAIL B4.1 ON SHEET A-351.
36. SHEET A-352-115; DETAIL B5/B5.1: THE DETAIL NOTE AT THE UPPER RIGHT REFERENCES DETAIL B2.1. REVISE THE REFERENCE.
37. SHEET A-401-118; STAIR FLOOR PLAN G3: A DETAIL E4/A-404 IS CUT AT THE MIDDLE OF THE STAIR. REVISE THE SHEET NUMBER.
38. SHEET A-403-120 (DETAIL B1); SHEET S-005-48 (BEAM SCHEDULE): THE GUARDRAIL DETAIL B1 INDICATES AN HSS 12X2X1/4 STRINGER, WHILE THE STRUCTURAL BEAM SCHEDULE INDICATES AN MC12X10.6 STRINGER (B16). CLARIFY.
39. SHEET A-410-121; ENLARGED PLAN E1: THE ELEVATION A-701 AT THE SINK IS CROSSED OUT. CLARIFY.
40. SHEET A-410-121; KEY NOTES: NOTE 17 REFERENCES DETAIL C1/A-720 FOR THE CHAIR RAIL. REVISE THE REFERENCE.
41. SHEET A-701-130: INCLUDE ON THE DRAWINGS ACCESSIBLE SHOWER DETAILS PER THE ICC/ANSI SECTION 608. INCLUDE GRAB BARS, SEATS, CLEARANCES, AND CONTROL/HANDSHOWER LOCATIONS.
42. SHEETS A-810-143 THROUGH A-817-150: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE VERBIAGE OF THE FIRE RESISTIVE ASSEMBLIES.
43. SHEET S-001-44; GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES (FOUNDATIONS); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 1): THE DRAWING NOTES AND THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A SOILS REPORT WAS USED TO DESIGN THE FOUNDATIONS. PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW.
44. SHEET S-001-44 (GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 3): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A FLOOR CORRIDOR LL OF 80 PSF, WHILE THE DRAWING GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES INDICATE 100 PSF. CLARIFY.
45. SHEET S-004-47; STRAPPED WALL TYPE I: A NOTE INDICATES A HOLDOWN, BUT IS NOT INDICATED. IS THERE A HOLDOWN AT A TYPICAL TYPE I WALL? VERIFY.
46. SHEET S103-51; DETAIL T48: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE DETAIL NOTES.
47. SHEET S103-51; DETAILS T44 AND T48: PROVIDE FOUNDATION CALCULATIONS FOR THE LIGHT POLE AND FLAG POLE.
48. SHEET S301-58 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S005-48 (JOIST SCHEDULE): THE PLAN REFERENCES A JOIST J8 IN THE LAUNDRY AREA ROOF FRAMING, BUT THE JOIST SCHEDULE DOES NOT INDICATE A J8. CLARIFY.
49. SHEET S301-58 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 4): THE METAL STUD JOISTS (CJ2) AT THE WEST CANOPY ARE NOT IN THE CALCULATIONS. VERIFY.
50. SHEET S301-58 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 31): THE ROOF BEAM RB9 (BEAM B4 IN THE BEAM SCHEDULE) INDICATES A W21X48. VERIFY THIS BEAM SIZE.
51. SHEETS S301-58, S302-59, S303-60, AND S304-61; FRAMING NOTE 7: REFERENCE IS MADE TO DETAIL T43 FOR FRAMING AT MECHANICAL OPENINGS. REVISE THE REFERENCE.
52. SHEET S301-58; FRAMING NOTE 14: REFERENCE IS MADE TO DETAIL 286 FOR A WOOD BRACE. REVISE THE REFERENCE.
53. SHEETS S301-58, S302-59, S303-60, AND S304-61; MILD SLAB REINFORCMENT TABLE: IN THE TABLE NOTE, REFERENCE IS MADE TO DETAIL 249 FOR SPECIAL SLAB DOWEL REINFORCING. REVISE THE REFERENCE.
54. SHEET S302-59 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: CALCULATIONS WERE NOT FOUND FOR THE ROOF FRAMING AT THE LONG TERM BIKE PARKING AREA. VERIFY.
55. SHEET S302-59 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 4): AT THE NORTH PORTION OF THE EXTERIOR REHAB AREA, THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A ROOF BEAM RB13. THIS BEAM IS NOT SHOWN ON THE FRAMING PLAN. CLARIFY.
56. SHEET S302-59 (HIGH ROOF #3 PLAN); DETAIL 277: THE DETAIL INDICATES 3 5/8" X 18 GAUGE JOISTS AT 24" OC. WHERE ARE THESE INDICATED ON THE PLAN? VERIFY.
57. SHEET S302-59 (HIGH ROOF #3 PLAN); DETAIL 275: THE DETAIL INDICATES STEEL JOISTS AT 24" OC. WHERE ARE THESE INDICATED ON THE PLAN? VERIFY.
58. SHEET S302-59 (HIGH ROOF #3 PLAN); DETAIL 275: THE DETAIL INDICATES THE WOOD BEAM IS LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE WALL. VERIFY.
59. SHEET S302-59 (AREA B FRAMING PLAN); DETAIL 286: IS THE DETAIL 286 (CUT AT THE ENTRY) CORRECT IN THIS LOCATION? VERIFY.
60. SHEET S401-63 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 56): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE HIGH ROOF BEAM HRB3 (BEAM B15 IN THE BEAM SCHEDULE) IS A W10X12, WHILE THE SCHEDULE INDICATES A METAL STUD BOX BEAM. CLARIFY.
61. SHEET S401-63; FRAMING PLAN: THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE ROOF BEAMS B18 AT THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT 'A' (TWO LOCATIONS) WERE NOT LOCATED. VERIFY.
62. SHEET S402-64; AREA C-D FRAMING PLAN: IN THE AREA C PORTION, THERE IS A DETAIL REFERENCE 223 IN THE CORRIDOR. SHOULD THIS BE REMOVED? VERIFY.
63. SHEET S605-71; DETAIL 283: REVISE THE DETAIL TITLE.
64. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEET 166: PROVIDE A KEY PLAN INDICATING COLUMN AND FOOTING LOCATIONS.
65. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
09/10/2014 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Completed
09/12/2014 LEERAY HANLY ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Plan review has been completed and the following corrections are required. Please provide a written response to comments with plan re-submittal.

1) Provide 2012 City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code compliance information. Reference sections 104.2 and 104.2.1 of the OLC. http://pdsd.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes-ordinances/2012_outdoor_lighting_code_.pdf
2) E-110.217 3 each SE luminaires in the generator enclosure are not circuited to a panel.
3) E-111-218/219 Luminaire schedule does not correspond with outdoor luminaires listed on pp E-111-217
4) E-211-222 a) Elevator machine room routed to 2A-25,27 noted as "spare" in panel b) circuiting for rooms 163 and 164 not noted c) ckt 2SB1-6 recep in mechanical room 178…is this correct?
5) E-212-223 a)ckt in storage 171R shown to pnael 2C-33, but panel is labeled for guest services b) recap in concierge 170A cktd to 2SB1-9 but loads are incorrect (note ckt has already been used)
6) E-213-224 a) loads shown for receps at Nurse 151B are incorrect in panel b) Ckt listed for pharmacy 151E (2SB2-14) is incorrect c) Ckt 2SB2-18,20 @ pharmacy 151E is either mislabeled or the loads are incorrect as Elec 150C goes to same ckt d) loads and labels for corridor 151 on 2SB2-13 incorrect
7) E-214-225 a) loads shown on 2SB2-21 corridor 152 incorrect b) loads shown on 2SB2-14,16 corridor 150 do not account for additional loads in pharmacy 151
8) E-221-226 a) Room 203 heat pump ckt'd to "spare" in pnl 2SB3-32,34 b) Room 201 heat pump ckt'd to "spare" pnl 2SB3-35,37 c) Room 202 heat pump ckt'd to "spare" in pnl 2SB3-39,41 d) loads incorrect ckt 2SB2-24 (Elec 250C) e) loads incorrect ckt 2SB2-26 (Elec 250D) f) Heat pumps for rooms 225, 227, 229, 231 routed to "spares" in pnl 2SB3
9) E-222-227 a) corridor 251 & 151 have outlets cktd to 2SB2-13 loads are incorrect if ckting is noted properly b) outlets in corridor 251 ckt'd to 2I-16 this ckt is already used for other purposes
10) E-233-230 a) roof receps ckt'd to 2M4-7, that ckt is being used for heat pump room 143
11) E-311-232 a) mister control shown ckt'd to spare breaker 2M4-2
12) E-714-248 a) identify exhaust fan and ckt in room Elec 150C
13) E-410-238 a) loads indicated in panel 2K1-26 do not match the # of receps shown connected to that ckt b) GFI recap routed to 2K2-35 is noted as spare in panel c) lighting shown ckt'd to 2K1-1 this ckt is already sued for booster heater
14) PANEL SCHEDULES a) the following circuits have labels and loads noted but were not found in the lighting or power plans: 4A-9; 4M1-37,39,41; 4M2-2,4,6; 4SB1-5; 2A-8; 2B-20; 2B-22; 2C-1; 2G-32,24,26; 2I-10,12,14; 2J-1,3,5; 2K-14; 2K1-8; 2K2-1; 2K2-4; 2K2-12; 2C-7,9,11; 2M1-18; 2M1-20,22; 2M4-38,40; 2M5-64,66; 2N-25; 2N-14,16,18; 2N-28; 2SB1-15; 2SB1-17; 2SB2-23; 2SB2-29,31; 2SB2-40; 2SB2-42; 2SB3-31; 2SB3-33; 2SB4-37,39; 2SB5-14; 2SB5-16; 2SB5-18; S2B5-20; 2SB5-22
15) Adjust all panel schedules and load information to reflect actual connections.



If there are questions regarding this review contact:

LeeRay
520-837-4906
LeeRay.Hanly@tucsonaz.gov
09/12/2014 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
09/12/2014 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide justification for including the long-term bicycle building with the envelope compliance certificate for the main building. The long-term bicycle building is a low-energy building and is exempt from the envelope requirements of the energy code. Reference: Section C101.5.2, IECC 2012.
2. Has the roof over the generator enclosure been included with the roof over the main building in the envelope energy calculations? As a low-energy portion of the main building that is separated from the main building by a thermal envelope assembly, it is exempt from the envelope requirements of the energy code. Reference: Section C101.5.2, IECC 2012.
3. Show that the proposed mechanical systems for the building comply with the current energy code (e.g. provide a COMcheck Mechanical Compliance Certificate). Supporting documentation shall be either on the drawings or in the project manual.
4. Provide NFRC fenestration product ratings for the U-factor and Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC) on COMcheck or use the appropriate default U-factor from Tables C303.1.3 (1) and C303.1.3 (2), IECC 2012. Show the required U-factors SHGC values for the vertical glazing on the drawings. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IEC 2012.
5. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Use the exterior design conditions shown in Section 302.2, IECC 2012, as modified by the City of Tucson. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012.
6. Provide column headings for the exhaust requirements chart on sheet M-512 to provide clarity. Reference Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
7. Change the label of the exhaust fan located in Area B from EF-7 to EF-6.
8. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains for the HVAC units. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson.
9. The grease exhaust duct is noted as being constructed of welded 16-gage (0.0575") galvanized steel. Provide guidance for treating the heat affected zones of the duct to provide corrosion resistance. Reference: Section 506.3.1.1, IMC 2012.
10. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I hood is supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2012 (the hood hanging weight plus the weight of personnel working in or on the hood). Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2012.
11. Show that the hood installation complies with Section 507.9, IMC 2012 with regard to a smooth, cleanable, non-absorbent, and non-combustible material installed between the hood and the wall, and extending 18" beyond the hood.
09/12/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Lined water heaters with a heat input of 200,000 BTU per hour or more, an operating water temperature of 210º F or greater, or a nominal water containing capacity of 120 gallons or more are required to comply with the rules contained in Article 4 (Arizona Boilers and Lined Hot Water Heaters) of the Arizona Administrative Code. http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_20/20-05.htm#ARTICLE_4.
2. Verify that the Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department for Pima County will allow water from an elevator sump to be introduced into the sanitary waste system. Reference: Section 701.5, IPC 2012; Contact the Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department, at 520-724-6200 for further information.
3. Provide water isometrics and waste and vent isometrics. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
4. Clarify detail 4/P411 - two different backgrounds are printed on the detail.
5. Verify the roof drain piping above the ceiling of room 213 (1/P-222).
6. Show how expansion and contraction of the main hot and cold water piping runs will be accommodated. Reference: Section 305.2, IPC 2012.
7. Provide calculations to show that the schedule 40, 3" CPVC for the 160 degree hot water piping will not be over-stressed prior to the T&P relief valve operating. (Also, verify the temperature of the hot water system - detail 3/P510 shows both 140 and 160 degree hot water in the same pipe.) Reference: Section 305.2, IPC 2012.
8. Provide automatic faucets for the public lavatories (i.e. L-2, L-3), dispensing a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
9. Provide tempered water for the lavatories in public restrooms using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012.
10. If the SH-2 showers do not have pre-fabricated receptors, provide details to show that the construction of the receptors complies with the requirements of Section 417.5.2, IPC 2012.
11. Verify the location of the adjustable flow control valve in the 160 degree hot water supply pipe (keynote 11, detail 2/P-410). Reference: Section 607.2, IPC 2012.
12. The civil utility plan (C-402) shows a 3" water meter, a 3" reduced pressure backflow prevention assembly, and a 4" water service pipe to the building. The plumbing plan for the mechanical room (P-411) shows a 4" double check valve in the mechanical room and the pressure calculations include the pressure drop from a 3" double check valve. Revise the water distribution system pressure calculations to account for the pressure loss for the reduced pressure backflow prevention assembly (approximately 12 PSI) in addition to the 4" double check valve if the double check valve is to be retained (the reduced pressure backflow prevention assembly is required but the double check valve is not). Reference: Section 604.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
13. Clarify why the plumbing fixture schedule shows that hot water is not being supplied to the clinical sinks (CS-1). Reference: Section 607.1, IPC 2012.
14. Show how the make-up water supply for the water feature will be protected from contamination. Reference: Section 608.1, IPC 2012.
15. The direct-connection of water to an appliance (e.g. a misting system) shall be protected against backflow. Specify the device to be used for the appliance connection. Reference: Sections 608.1 and 608.16.6, IPC 2012.
16. Appliances (e.g. coffee makers, ice makers, etc) to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Section 608.13.1, IPC require backflow prevention. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for each water connection. Reference: Sections 608.1 and 608.3, IPC 2012.
17. Horizontal branches shall connect no closer than ten diameters downstream of the bases of stacks. Reference: Section 704.3, IPC 2012.
18. Provide a cleanout at the base of each waste stack. Reference: Section 708.3.4, IPC 2012.
19. Provide separate indirect waste pipes for each compartment of the 3-compartment sink to protect against cross-contamination or fouling. Reference: Sections 801.2 and 802.1.8, IPC 2012.
20. Verify that all of the vents (except for vents serving interceptors located outdoors) rise vertically to at least 6" above the flood rims of the fixtures they protect prior to running horizontally (e.g. see detail 1/P-410). Reference: Section 905.4, IPC 2012.
21. Floor drains shall not be connected to a storm drain. Reference: Section 1104.3, IPC 2012.
22. Revise the natural gas schematic to coordinate with the natural gas piping plan (e.g. where does RTU-18 show on the plans; where do the kitchen loads, RTU-5, and the future iron press). Show all of the loads (e.g. the dryers and the kitchen loads), developed lengths of the piping, the pipe sizes, and the minimum pressure at the inlet to the pressure reducing valves. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012 and Section 402.1, IFGC 2012.
23. Provide the sizes, loads and developed lengths of the low pressure natural gas piping to each gas-fired appliance. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012 and Section 402.1, IFGC 2012.
09/22/2014 LHANLY1 COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Completed
09/23/2014 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: 2040 N WILMOT RD
T14CM05727
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 23, 2014

1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve until a development package has been approved.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
09/24/2014 AROMERO4 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed