Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T14CM05643
Parcel: 14027044B

Address:
6251 S TUCSON BL

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T14CM05643
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/29/2014 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. GENERAL: PROVIDE A CODE ANALYSIS ON THE DRAWINGS.
2. SHEET 2; CODE NOTES: PROVIDE A CALCULATION ON THIS SHEET INDICATING THE OCCUPANT LOAD. THIS PROJECT IS FOR THE 864 SF PORTION ONLY, AND DOES NOT INCLUDE OCCUPANT LOAD OR EXITING FOR THE EXISTING PORTION. REVISE.
3. SHEET 2; PLUMBING REQUIREMENTS: PROVIDE ON THIS SHEET PLUMBING REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS PROJECT. SINCE NO NEW PLUMBING HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE NEW ADDITION, THE EXISTING PLUMBING MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC TABLE 2902.1 FOR WATER CLOSETS, LAVATORIES, DRINKING FOUNTAINS, AND SERVICE SINK.
4. SHEET 2: PER THE IBC SECTION 3411.7, UP TO 20% OF THE COST OF THIS PROJECT MUST BE USED FOR ACCESSIBILITY ISSUES. PROVIDE A STATEMENT ON THIS SHEET INDICATING THE BREAKDOWN OF THE COST OF THE ITEMS ASSOCIATED WITH ACCESSIBILITY ISSUES, AND THE PERCENTAGE THOSE COSTS INCUR COMPARED TO THE TOTAL JOB COST (PROJECT VALUATION IS $104,094.72).
5. SHEET S-1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES.
6. SHEET S-1 (GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES); SHEET S-2 (DETAIL 13): DO THE SCREW CONNECTORS OF THE ROOF/WALL DECK LISTED IN THE GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES MATCH THE CONNECTORS IN DETAIL 13? VERIFY.
7. SHEET S-2: PROVIDE SECTION TITLES AND NUMBERS AT THE SECTIONS ON THE UPPER LEFT CORNER.
8. SHEET S-2; DETAIL 2: THE BASE TRACK ANCHORS INDICATE (2) 5/8" DIAMETER X 5" EMBED KWIK BOLTS AT 24" O.C. IS THIS CORRECT, OR SHOULD DETAILS 5/S-2, 7/S-2, AND 8/S-2 APPLY? VERIFY. IS THE COLUMN DESIGNATION CORRECT AT DETAIL 2, OR SHOULD THIS BE A WALL?
9. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: NO CALCULATIONS WERE INCLUDED FOR THE FOUNDATION DESIGN. PROVIDE.
10. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
11/13/2014 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change The development package (DP14-0151) must be approved and the buildiing plans must match the plans for the development package.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/22/2014 AROMERO4 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
12/22/2014 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed