Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/WWM
Permit Number - T14CM05619
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/WWM
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/28/2014 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/29/2014 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T14CM05619 3163 W Mockingbird Lane Single Family Residence - HDZ and ERZ Overlay Compliance required TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 4, 2014 DUE DATE: September 12, 2014 COMMENTS: 01. Zoning has reviewed the plot plan for compliance with the zoning requirements for a single family home development in the SR zone. Respond to the comments below and address any comments related to drawing format or content. 02. The site is subject to compliance with the HDZ and ERZ requirements listed in UDC Article 5 Section 5.2 and 5.7 respectively. Zoning cannot approve the building plans until the HDZ and ERZ review have been completed and approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. |
| 09/10/2014 | RAFAEL CANCINO | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS Date: September 18, 2014 Activity: T14CM05619 Address: 3163 N. Mockingbird LN. Applicant: Matthew Noriega Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. In order to facilitate a shorter back check time, please provide two sets of updated plans and calculations with a written response to each of the notated items indicating action taken. SCOPE OF REVIEW: The scope of this plan review covers architectural, plumbing, mechanical, energy conservation and electrical. All code references are to the 2012 International Residential Code and 2012 International Energy Conservation Code. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions and concerns before permit approval. GENERAL NOTES: " Inclusive Home Design Ordinance adopted by the City of Tucson Ordinance #10463 on 10/16/2007. Notate an accessible door with a maximum ½" threshold height, a 30" minimum net interior door width, lever-type door hardware, electrical outlet reachable range of 15" - 48" above floor, grab bar reinforcement of 2"x6" blocking at the toilet, tub and shower 36" above floor, and a second row at the tub 9" above the tub rim. " All SFR and Duplex plans submitted after March 1, 2009 require a solar water system, or future installation preparation City of Tucson Ordinance #10549 with one of the following provisions: ½"control conduit and two ¾" copper piping for water with rooftop termination; straight 3" capped sleeve; or an accessible attic (clear path 30" wide x 30" high) over the water heater. Show appropriate notation. " All SFR and Duplex plans submitted after July 1, 2009 require a solar photo-voltaic system, or future installation preparation City of Tucson Ordinance #10549 with the following provisions: 1. A 4 square feet area for (meter, disconnect & inverter) equipment adjacent to the electrical service panel or near the proposed collector panel space. 2. The best roof space available for accommodating PV solar collector panels with capacity for collector dead loading (typically 4 lbs/SF). 3. A minimum 3,800 volt-ampere PV electrical load entry on the Service Load Calculation (Show as a continuous load of 15.8 A). 4. An Electrical Panel Schedule with a 240 volt circuit breaker space labeled "reserved for Photo Voltaic". " All construction drawings submitted after June 1, 2010 for one- or two-family dwellings must provide gray water utilization or preparation, Ordinance #10579/11089 revised July 9, 2013. Include two clothes washer standpipes at an exterior wall, one with an above grade stub-out, and one to the building drain. FLOOR PLAN: 1. Show of floor plan where sections A and B are coming from. 2. Provide truss calculations. ELEVATIONS: 1. Show all areas where veneer is being applied. SECTIONS AND DETAILS: 1. Provide note requiring additional veneer ties around openings and flashing and weepholes R703.7.4.1.1, R703.7.5 and R703.7.6 PLUMBING PLAN: 1. Provide provision for gray-water system. ELECTRICAL PLANS: 1. Identify outlets in kitchen area as GFCI. 2. Provide CO detector at entrance to garage. R315.1 3. Show light fixtures over shower and tub as weather-proof. 4. Fan switches in living room and master bedroom are only showing one switch? 5. Identify all exterior outlets a GFCI. 6. Identify light switches in guest bedroom, great room and porch as three-way. If you have any questions please contact: Rafael Cancino (520) 909-4891 City of Tucson Residential Plan Review |
| 09/16/2014 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The site is subject to compliance with the HDZ and ERZ requirements listed in UDC Article 5 Section 5.2 and 5.7 respectively. Zoning/NPPO cannot approve the building plans until the HDZ and ERZ review have been completed. Include the following notes on cover sheet: Vegetation Retention and Revegetation Vegetation Retention (1) Existing viable and transplantable trees with four inch or greater trunk diameter and cacti shall be preserved in their original locations, except for building sites and access and utilities serving building sites. (a). When retention of the above trees and cacti in their original locations is not possible due to building site location, the trees and cacti shall be salvaged and replanted in areas requiring revegetation, whenever possible. Revegetation All cut or fillslopes that are no steeper than three horizontal to one vertical and all utility trenches or septic leaching fields that are not located in parking or driveway areas shall be revegetated in compliance with the following standards: All plants used in revegetation shall be the same as the native vegetation on the site prior to grading or clearing or any adjacentsite; and, 2. Revegetation shall be accomplished with the following minimum standards for plants: (a) Desert trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size with a minimum trunk diameter of two inches measured at the soil level, or large specimen cactus shall be placed at the same vegetation density found on the site prior to any clearing, grubbing, or grading; and, (b) Seeds for trees, desert shrubs, and grasses shall be planted with a density adequate to control erosion and may use one of the following methods of planting: Raked into the soil with appropriate mulch materials; hydroseeding; anchored mulches; or established on jute, rolled straw, or similar material. Another method may be approved by PDSD. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 09/16/2014 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | DATE: September 16, 2014 SUBJECT: 3163 W Mockingbird Lane HDZ Engineering Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold P.E. CPM, CFM ACTIVITY NUMBER: T14CM05619 SUMMARY: The site plan submittal was reviewed by PDSD Engineering. Engineering does not recommend approval until the following comments are addressed. COMMENTS: 1) Tech Man Sec. 2-01: Address the following grading related comments: a) Submit Grading Plan. Grading Plan review approval is necessary for construction activity at the site. b) In order to determine extents of previous disturbance to the site, clarify and label location of pre-disturbed limits on the grading plan. c) Provide interceptor swale information on grading plan. d) Label existing gate on driveway. e) Label areas where mitigation is proposed in previously disturbed areas on driveway or other areas (if vegetation or other mitigation is proposed). f) Label slope of driveway. g) Provide lot dimensions per recorded information. 2) UDC Sec.5.2.5.A: Submit HDZ Overlay documentation for review. a) Add notation for the total proposed disturbed area. b) Label any areas of future disturbance (i.e. future pool area or gazebo). c) Show a calculation for the disturbed area in square feet and as a percentage of total lot area. d) Dimension minimum distances from lot property boundaries. e) Areas of 15% or greater shall be delineated in a surveyable manner and labeled as Natural Areas and excluded from development. f) Provide the ACS calculation as a note. The average natural cross-slope shall be calculated for the entire parcel, and if the ACS is 15% or greater, columns A and D of Table 5.2-1 apply. 3) UDC Sec.5.7: Submit information regarding the ERZ Overlay for review; it is likely that the limits of disturbance have not impacted the floodplain and therefore the ERZ-ERR Report may not be required. This will be determined after addressing floodplain comments below. 4) Tech Man Sec.4-04: Floodplain Use Permit submittal is required. Provide Drainage statement with flowrate and erosion hazard setback information. Label Enchanted Hills Wash as ERZ Overlay watercourse on planviews. Show floodplain limits, flowrate and EHS limits on grading and site plans. For questions or to set up a meeting, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E. CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Dept |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/19/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |