Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T14CM05356
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/18/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/18/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET C-100: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE NOTES. 2. SHEET D-200: DARKEN THE LETTERING. 3. SHEET D-200; WALL TYPES NOTES AND LEGEND: ARE THE "INDICATES NEW BARRICADE", "INDICATES EXISTING SOFFIT TO BE DEMOLISHED", AND "INDICATES CEILING FIXTURES TO REMAIN" NOTES PERTINENT ON THIS PLAN? NONE ARE INDICATED. 4. SHEET A-100; DOOR AND HARDWARE SCHEDULES: DARKEN THE LETTERING. 5. SHEET A-100; WALL TYPES NOTES AND LEGEND: THE WALL TYPE INDICATOR REFERENCES A-700C. REVISE THAT REFERENCE. 6. SHEET A-300; ENLARGED PLANS 2 AND 3: INDICATE ON THE SECTION CUTS IF A-700 IS A, B, C, OR D. 7. SHEET A-300; FINISH PLAN: INDICATE ON THE SECTION CUT 11A AT THE NORTH WALL IF A-700 IS A, B, C, OR D. 8. SHEET A-400: DARKEN THE LETTERING. 9. SHEET A-501: DARKEN THE ENTIRE SHEET. 10. SHEET A-501; SECTIONS 1 AND 2: PROVIDE THE SIZE AND SPACING AT THE NEW METAL STUDS. INDICATE THE CONNECTION OF THE NEW STUDS TO THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE, AND INDICATE ANY NEW FRAMING REQUIRED BETWEEN THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE TO SUPPORT THE NEW STUDS. 11. SHEET A-700C; DETAIL 12: PARTITION TYPE B INDICATES BRACING DETAIL 2/4 ON SHEET A-700C. DETAIL 4 INDICATES 'NOT USED'. CLARIFY. 12. SHEET A-700C; WALL CONFIGURATIONS 12: ON PARTITION E, INDICATE IF DETAIL REFERENCE A-700 IS A, B, C, OR D. 13. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 08/18/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 08/19/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide automatic faucets for the lavatories, dispensing a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. Provide tempered water for the lavatories and public hand-washing sinks in restrooms using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012. 3. Clarify the size of the main water line - it is ¾" on the plumbing plan (1/P1-100) and 1" on the plumbing isometrics. Reference: section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 4. Provide cleanouts sized for the nominal size of pipes that they serve up to 4-inches. Reference: Section 708.7, IPC 2012. 5. Provide a complete design for the natural gas distribution system showing the all of the loads, developed lengths, and the layout of the distribution piping. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 08/19/2014 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/20/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide the Mechanical Compliance Certificate to demonstrate that the new HVAC equipment complies with the 2012 International Energy Code. 2. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Provide exhaust for the fitting rooms per the requirements of Table 403.3, IMC 2012. 4. The roof of the building is constructed of wood (VB construction, not IIC). Show how the combustible materials within the return air plenum comply with Section 602.2.1, IMC 2012. |
| 08/20/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plan review has been completed and the following corrections are required. Please provide a written response to comments with plan re-submittal. 1) Erratta: Plans are code compliant but you need to provide accurate 2012 IECC lighting compliance information. Com-check information presented does not have accurate square footage figures, nor has the space by space method from table 405.5.2(2) been accurately applied. There is also no support for the additional "supplemental allowed watts". Correct Com-check for (sales area + dressing room + storage) = (2064 x 1.6 + 475 x 0.9 + 361 x 0.8) = 4018 allowable watts. Additional watts for retail are, per note (a) table 405.5.2(2), (500 + 2064 x 1.4)= 3390. If there are questions regarding this review contact: LeeRay 520-837-4906 LeeRay.Hanly@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/20/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 09/04/2014 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/04/2014 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |