Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T14CM05269
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/25/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET A1.0; CODE REVIEW CHECKLIST (GOVERNING REGULATIONS): REVISE THE EDITION OF THE ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS TO THE 2009 ANSI AND THE 2012 IBC. 2. SHEET A2.0; FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES: REMOVE THE NUMBERS IN NOTES 8 AND 9. 3. SHEET A5.0; EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS: REVERSE THE TITLE ON THESE TWO ELEVATIONS. 4. SHEET A7.0; HARDWARE GENERAL NOTES: NOTE 1 REFERENCES THE 2012 ANSI. REVISE THE REFERENCE. 5. SHEET A8.1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE VERBIAGE AND DIMENSIONS. 6. SHEET A8.1: REMOVE THE IRRELEVANT NUMBERS FROM DETAILS 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, AND 17. 7. SHEET S1.1; GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES (FOUNDATIONS): A NOTE INDICATES A SOILS REPORT WAS USED FOR THE FOUNDATION DESIGN. PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW. 8. SHEET S2.1 (FOUNDATION PLAN); COLUMN SCHEDULE: THE SCHEDULE INDICATES ONLY A C1, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES C1, C2, AND C3. CLARIFY. 9. SHEET S3.1; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: INDICATE ALL OF THE COLUMNS ON THE FRAMING PLAN. 10. SHEET S3.1; PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 22 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 11. SHEET S4.1; DETAIL 104: INDICATE THE WOOD COLUMN AND ITS BASE AND CONNECTION IN THIS DETAIL. 12. SHEET S4.1; DETAIL 104: SHOULD THE SHEATHING MATERIAL ON THE LEFT SIDE STUD WALL BE INDICATED ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE WALL? VERIFY. 13. SHEET S5.1; DETAIL 209: THERE ARE ONLY FIVE NOTES LISTED, BUT SEVEN INDICATED ON THE DETAIL. CLARIFY. 14. SHEET S5.1; DETAIL 209 (NOTES): ADD THE NOTE NUMBERS 6 AND 7. 15. SHEET S5.1; DETAIL 217: SHOULD THE STEEL PLATE (NOTE 5) BE WELDED TO THE COLUMN? VERIFY. 16. SHEET S3.1; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: INDICATE ON THE PLAN THE NEW MECHANICAL UNITS AND THEIR WEIGHTS. 17. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 09/29/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Eegees near Speedway & Pantano T14CM05269 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 29, 2014 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning has reviewed the building plan and it appears that the proposed building meets the requirements of DP14-0075. However due to the amount of building plan comments from other PDSD review agencies zoning will not approve at this time 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 09/29/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 10/02/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 10/02/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 10/02/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10/2014 | AROMERO4 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |