Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T14CM04782
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/04/2014 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/05/2014 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Building plan can not be approved until approval of the DP Package DP14-0131. Building plan will be stamped approved once it is verified that the layout matches the approved DP Package. JG |
| 08/11/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET T-1; GENERAL BUILDING SUMMARY: THE ACTUAL OCCUPANCY GROUP IS ASSEMBLY GROUP A-3. ADD VERBIAGE ON THE DRAWINGS PER THE IBC SECTION 303.1.1 THAT AN ASSEMBLY SPACE WITH AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF LESS THAN 50 SHALL BE CLASSIFIED AS A GROUP B OCCUPANCY. 2. SHEET T-1; GENERAL BUILDING SUMMARY: PROVIDE THE OCCUPANT LOAD (INCLUDING THE CALCULATION) ON THE DRAWINGS. THE 100 SF/OCCUPANT LISTED IS NOT CORRECT FOR THIS ASSEMBLY USE. 3. SHEET A-1: SINCE THIS BUILDING IS A SINGLE RESTROOM FACILITY, THE TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD, INCLUDING BOTH EMPLOYEES AND CUSTOMERS, MUST BE 15 OR LESS (IBC SECTION 2902.2, EXCEPTION 2). 4. SHEET A-1; FLOOR PLAN: THE IBC SECTION 1020 INDICATES EXIT DOORS SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 1008.1.1, REQUIRING A SWINGING-TYPE DOOR. THIS PLAN INDICATES THE EXIT WILL GO THROUGH THE BREAKROOM. THEREFORE, DOOR 103 IS NOT ALLOWED TO LOCK. NO HARDWARE IS LISTED FOR ANY DOOR IN THE SCHEDULE. PROVIDE HARDWARE LIST ON THE DRAWINGS AND VERIFY DOOR 103 IS NON-LOCKING. 5. SHEETS A-1 AND A-2; FLOOR PLANS: FINISH THE BUILDING SECTION CUTS BY PROVIDING THE SHEET NUMBER. 6. SHEET A-3; SOUTH AND WEST ELEVATIONS: THE ELEVATIONS INDICATE TO "SEE DETAIL" FOR THE PIPE GUARDRAIL, BUT SHEET S-1 IS THE ONLY SHEET INDICATING THE GUARDRAIL. PROVIDE A DETAIL ON THE DRAWINGS INDICATING RAIL MEMBER SIZES AND REQUIRED SPACING PER THE IBC SECTION 1013. 7. SHEET A-3; WEST ELEVATION: THE ELEVATION INDICATES TO "SEE DETAIL" FOR THE TOP OF THE CMU RETAINING WALL. PROVIDE THAT INFORMATION, OR REFERENCE SHEET S-1 (DETAILS 9 AND 10). 8. SHEET S-1; FOUNDATION PLAN: DETAILS 1 AND 7 INDICATE THE BOTTOM OF FOOTING TO BE 4'-4" FROM THE TOP OF SLAB, AND DETAILS 2 AND 5 INDICATE THE BOTTOM OF FOOTING TO BE 5'-8" FROM THE TOP OF SLAB. INDICATE ON THE FOUNDATION PLAN WHERE THE BOTTOM OF FOOTING STEPS, OR PROVIDE VERBIAGE INDICATING A CONSTANT SLOPE OF THE BOTTOM OF FOOTING FROM 4'-4" AT THE SOUTH END TO 5'-8" AT THE NORTH END. 9. SHEET S-1; DETAILS 4 AND 6: DETAIL 4 INDICATES 30" LAPS TO 2-#5 CONTINUOUS TIES, WHILE DETAIL 6 INDICATES 30" LAPS TO 2-#4 CONTINUOUS TIES. CLARIFY. 10. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 08/12/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 08/18/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 3145 E. Kleindale Road T14CM04782 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 18, 2014 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve until a development package has been approved. 3. Sheet T-1, INDEX TO DRAWINGS" list the "SITE PLAN, PAVING AND GRADING DRAINAGE NOTES, PAVING GRADING DRAINAGE PLAN, GRADING PLAN." These plans were not submitted as part of the building plans. 4. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 08/20/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; and the mechanical systems; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C103.2, C401.2, and C406, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 2. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012. 3. Provide structural details to show how the fan coil units are to be connected to the building structure. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2012. |
| 08/20/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Verify that the use of a temperature mixing valve with the tankless water heater complies with the water heater manufacturer's listing requirements. Reference: Sections 303.2 and 607.1, IPC 2012. 2. The submitted water pressure calculations do not support the size of the water supply to the restroom (7 fixture units will require a 1" pipe). Reference: Sections 604.1 and 604.3, IPC 2012 3. Provide the dimensions of the rain gutter, its slope, and the size of the single downspout. Reference: Section 1106.6, IPC 2012. |
| 08/20/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide a site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Note that Tucson Water will need to approve locating the water meter in the driveway. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 08/21/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | YUP |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/04/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |