Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T14CM04765
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/01/2014 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Reference previous comment 5: 1. No written structural response included in resubmittal package. 2. On the calculation key plan, three rows of 2-2x6s are indicated while on sheet S3.0, note 23 states that the hood is to be supported from the existing ceiling joists per typical detail. The typical detail 123/S1.3 shows four rows of 2-2x6s on one side to be existing ceiling joists and new on the other side. Please reconcile all three references and add a reference to detail 123 from the roof framing plan. 2. New Comment: On sheet A4, South Elevation, provide a window sill dimension of 44" maximum as required by the 2012 IBC, Section 1029.3. END OF REVEIW |
| 10/02/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | According to the company literature, the Rockford grease separators (e.g. the GS series) do not require the use of an external flow control device but the Rockford grease interceptors (e.g. the RP series) do require the installation of a flow control device. Note also, that the Rockford RP-75 grease interceptor is not a listed product. [Initial comment: The specified hydromechanical grease interceptor (Rockford RP-75) requires the installation of an external flow control device. Show how this device is to be installed. Reference: Sections 303.2 and 1003.3.4.2, IPC 2012.] |
| 10/03/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The use of REScheck (especially not with the 2009 IECC code) for the residential areas of the addition is not necessary; COMcheck can be used if the building areas are input appropriately. Provide NFRC fenestration product ratings for the U-factor and the SHGC values on COMcheck or use the appropriate default U-factor and SHGC values from Tables C303.1.3 (1) and C303.1.3.(2), IECC 2012. Reference: Sections C303.1.3 and R303.1.3, IEC 2012. [Initial comment: Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the additions to the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. The information on the drawings shall agree with the component descriptions shown on the envelope compliance certificate. Note that the residential occupancy areas of the building addition are to meet the residential provisions of the IECC while the commercial occupancies are to meet the commercial provisions of the IECC. Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.4.6, C101.5, and C103.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.] 2. Mechanical ventilation of residential occupancies is a mandatory requirement. Reference: Section 102.1, IBC 2012. [Initial comment: Residential occupancies require mechanical ventilation. Reference: Section R403.5, IECC 2012.] 3. See previous comment. [Initial comment: Revise the ventilation calculations to show the two new bedrooms being served by the ductless heat pumps, not AC-3. Show how they are to be supplied with outside air. Reference: Section 403.2, IMC 2012 and Section R403.5, IECC 2012.] |
| 10/06/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 5326 E. Pima Street T14CM04765 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 7, 2014 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. If the development package sheets are going to be part of the building submittal they will need to be the signed approved set or marked as reference only. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10/2014 | SHANAE POWELL | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/10/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |