Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - - 2ND
Permit Number - T14CM04729
Review Name: REVISION - - 2ND
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/07/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. PREVIOUS COMMENT 1: WAS A CHANGE IN THE REFERENCED CONSTRUCTION TYPE CONSIDERED? IT APPEARS SECTION 602.3 COULD ALLOW A TYPE III CONSTRUCTION RATHER THAN TYPE V, WHICH WOULD CHANGE THE ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA, WHICH IN TURN COULD AFFECT THE BUILDING SEPARATION ISSUES. 2. PREVIOUS COMMENT 2: THE TWO HOUR FIRE WALL IS ALLOWED IN TABLE 706.4 PER NOTE a FOR THAT TABLE (TYPE V CONSTRUCTION). PLEASE REVIEW SECTION 706.5 FOR THE HORIZONTAL CONTINUITY REQUIREMENTS, AND SECTION 706.6 FOR THE VERTICAL CONTINUITY REQUIREMENTS. IF THE EXCEPTIONS ARE NOT MET, FIRE WALLS MUST EXTEND OUTSIDE OF THE EXTERIOR WALLS AND ABOVE THE ROOF. 3. PREVIOUS COMMENT 3: THE WALL TYPE H IN THE SCHEDULE STILL INDICATES TO EXTEND THE FIRE PARTITION TO JUST ABOVE THE EXISTING CEILING. THIS MIGHT BE ADEQUATE AT SOME WALLS, BUT AT ROOMS OR113 AND ULTRASOUND 114, THESE WALLS MUST EXTEND TO THE ROOF DECK. PLEASE REVISE. 4. PREVIOUS COMMENT 4: THE WALLS AT CLOSET 110, HAZARD ROOM 111, RESTROOM 109, AND LAB 108 WERE NOT MARKED WITH A WALL TYPE REFERENCE. PLEASE PROVIDE. 5. PREVIOUS COMMENT 5: WALL E AT HALL 115 WAS NOT REVISED TO REFERENCE A ONE HOUR FIRE PARTITION IN THE SCHEDULE. PLEASE REVISE. 6. PREVIOUS COMMENT 6: PLEASE REVISE THE WALL TYPE H DESCRIPTION IN THE SCHEDULE FOR THE CORRIDOR WALL AT HALL 115. 7. PREVIOUS COMMENT 7: IF WALL TYPE S IS TO BE A FIRE WALL, VERIFY THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTINUITY REQUIREMENT ARE MET (SEE COMMENT 2). 8. PREVIOUS COMMENT 9: WALL TYPE E AT ALL CORRIDORS MUST BE CHANGED TO A DIFFERENT WALL TYPE AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS ON THE PLAN. PLEASE REVISE. 9. PREVIOUS COMMENT 11: PLEASE VERIFY THAT THE HALL 104 DOES NOT EXCEED THE LENGTH REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1018.4 FOR A DEAD END CORRIDOR. 10. PREVIOUS COMMENT 13: PLEASE VERIFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1018.6 FOR CORRIDOR CONTINUITY ARE MET AT RECEPTION AREA 100. TWO HALLWAYS (132 AND 143) ENTER THE RECEPTION AREA, BUT THERE IS NO CORRIDOR CONTINUITY, AND THE RECEPTION AREA IS NOT LIKELY TO MEET THE CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENT IN THE EXCEPTION. 11. PREVIOUS COMMENT 16: PLEASE VERIFY THE STOREFRONT ASSEMBLY FIRE RATING (KEYNOTE 15) AT SEVERAL EXITS. THIS DIRECTLY AFFECTS THE REQUIREMENTS NOTED IN COMMENT 10. 12. PREVIOUS COMMENT 19: PLEASE VERIFY EXISTING EXIT DOORS MEET THE REQUIRED FIRE RESISTANCE RATING, AND LIST THAT IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE ON SHEET A4.0. 13. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 04/13/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The Architect has not yet resolved the fire-rating issues for this building making it impossible to review your design at this time. [Initial comment: Numerous walls will have to be fire-rated which will in turn affect the duct penetrations. Coordinate the treatment of all penetrations of fire-rated walls with the architect. Reference: Section 607, IMC 2012.] |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/21/2015 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |