Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T14CM04464
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/21/2014 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/25/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET A1.1; DETAIL 4: PROVIDE THE STEEL PIPE SIZE AND THE CONCRETE PIER SIZE. 2. SHEET A4.0; KEYNOTES: NOTE 1 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE ELEVATIONS. VERIFY. 3. SHEET A4.1; SOUTH ELEVATION: THE KEYNOTE INDICATOR AT THE BOLLARD SHOULD BE COMPLETED. 4. SHEET A4.1; SOUTH AND WEST ELEVATIONS: NOTE 4 IS INDICATED AT THE RIDGE VENT ON BOTH ELEVATIONS. REVISE. 5. SHEET A5.0; KEYNOTES: NOTES 3 AND 4 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE ELEVATIONS. VERIFY. 6. SHEET A5.0; KEYNOTES: NOTE 12 IS INDICATED ON THE HANGAR SECTION 1 ABOVE THE TAIL OVERHEAD DOOR. VERIFY. 7. SHEET S0.1; GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES (FOUNDATIONS): NOTE 1 INDICATES A SHALLOW SPREAD FOOTING DESIGN WAS RECOMMENDED IN THE SOILS REPORT. THE SOILS REPORT INVESTIGATED ONLY DRILLED SHAFT FOUNDATIONS. REVISE SHEET S0.1. 8. SHEET S1.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (LAST PAGE): THE TABLE IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT INDICATES 18' MINIMUM EMBEDMENT LENGTH OF DRILLED PIERS ALONG GRIDS A AND A.3, AND 16' MINIMUM EMBEDMENT LENGTH ALONG GRIDS B THROUGH G. SHOULD THE CAISSON FOOTING CF1 IN THE FOOTING SCHEDULE ON SHEET S1.0 BE CHANGED TO 16'? VERIFY. 9. SHEET S1.0: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE "TYP" AND "SIM" NOTES AT THE DETAIL REFERENCES ON THE PLAN. 10. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 07/28/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The existing 10" public sewer that is located within the boundaries of the proposed hangar is constructed of vitreous clay pipe. This is not approved for use under a building. Reference: Section 702.2, IPC 2012. 2. Provide the slope of the rain gutters. Reference: Section 1106.6, IPC 2012. |
| 07/28/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Show the location of the new reduced pressure backflow preventer for the water service to the new hangar on the site plan. |
| 07/29/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. |
| 07/29/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 07/31/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/06/2014 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |