Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T14CM04365
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/03/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Rooms 103, 109, 110, 115, and 117 are still using the egress corridor as a return duct. [Second comment: The mechanical code does not differentiate between fire-rated and non-fire-rated corridors so the presence or absence of doors is not applicable. Corridors are not to be used as a means of transferring air.] [Initial comment: Revise the mechanical design as required to avoid using the corridors as return air ducts. Reference: Section 601.2, IMC 2012.] |
| 10/03/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Four of the details on sheets P-1 and P-2 (2 details on each sheet) still have fonts smaller than 3/32". [Second comment: Comment not resolved; four of the details on sheets P-1 and P-2 and the description of the drinking fountain in the fixture schedule have fonts smaller than 3/32".] [Initial comment: Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 3/32-inch. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] |
| 10/08/2014 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The water heater platform specifications on sheet P1 calls for a mounting platform WHP1 and refrences detail 17/A2.1. There is no detail at reference detail block 17/A2.1 Please reconcile. |