Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T14CM04220
Parcel: 137055390

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T14CM04220
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/08/2014 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Reqs Change Comment not resolved; show the location and size of the existing reduced pressure zone backflow prevention assembly for the water service to the building. [Initial comment: Provide the size and location of the reduced pressure zone backflow prevention assembly for the water service to the building. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf.]
09/08/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. The lavatories in the plumbing fixture schedule are now specified with two different faucets (American Standard 1340.227 and American Standard 6056.205); which one will be used? Note that the water use requirement is 0.25 gallons per cycle, not 0.25 gallons per minute. [Initial comment: Provide automatic faucets for the lavatories, dispensing a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.]
2. The plumbing fixture schedule still shows the Watts model LF1170 being used for providing tempered water to the lavatories. It is not listed as complying with ASSE 1070; provide a mixing valve that is listed to ASSE 1070. [Initial comment: Provide tempered water for the lavatories and public hand-washing sinks in restrooms using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. The specified Watts USG-B is listed per ASSE 1070, not ASSE 1016. Note that the Watts LF1170 (called out as "MV" in the plumbing fixture schedule - keynote #3 on sheet P2?) is listed per ASSE 1017 and cannot be used for tempering water temperature at fixtures or where ASSE 1016, 1069, or 1070 listed mixing valves are required. Reference: Sections 303.2, 416.5, and 607.1.2, IPC 2012.]
3. At a minimum, beverage dispensers require the use of a backflow preventer that is listed to ASSE 1022. The Watts model SD-2 is not listed to ASSE 1022 and is not acceptable. Reference: Section 608.16.10, IPC 2012. [Initial comment: Appliances (e.g. coffee brewers, ice makers, etc) to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Section 608.13.1, IPC require backflow prevention. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for each water connection. Reference: Sections 608.1 and 608.3, IPC 2012.]
4. The two-way cleanout shown down steam of the gravity grease interceptor is not located at the junction of a building drain and a building sewer; cleanouts shall open to allow cleaning in the direction of flow. [Initial comment: An approved 2-way cleanout fitting is allowed to be used at the junction of a building drain and a building sewer; otherwise, cleanouts shall open to allow cleaning in the direction of flow. Reference: Sections 708.3.5 and 708.5, IPC 2012.]
5. A horizontal pipe is defined as any pipe making an angle of less than 45 degrees with the horizontal (Section 202, IPC 2012); the vent for the floor sink located in room 105 appears to have a horizontal section that is lower than 6" above the flood rim of the floor sink. There are multiple ways to provide venting for fixtures in the IPC but horizontal vents located below the flood rim of a fixture inside a building are not allowed. [Initial comment: Verify that all of the vents (except for vents serving interceptors located outdoors) rise vertically to at least 6" above the flood rims of the fixtures they protect prior to running horizontally (e.g. the floor sink in room 105). Reference: Section 905.4, IPC 2012.]
6. Correcting the gravity grease interceptor calculation (using F=44.9 rather than F=39) shows a minimum size of 1,684 gallons for the interceptor. A commonly available 2,000-gallon interceptor would be sufficient for your restaurant. Installing an over-size gravity grease interceptor tends to result in the production of hydrogen sulphide gas which will cause damage to the interceptor and generate odor complaints. Verify that the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department will allow the installation of an over-sized gravity grease interceptor. [Initial comment: Revise the sizing calculations for the gravity grease interceptor per Section 1003.3, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.]
7. Revise notes 1 and 5 of the gas water heater schedule to use the appropriate section numbers from the 2012 IECC. [Initial comment: The energy compliance notes in the gas water heater schedule are based on the 2006 IECC; the 2012 IECC is the current code.]
09/09/2014 LEERAY HANLY ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Plan review has been completed and the following corrections are required. Please provide a written response to comments with plan re-submittal.

1) Errata: Your site is in compliance with the Outdoor Lighting Code, there was no need however to subtract the area of the building from the sites total area. You can correct sheet E0.2 or simply send me an email allowing me pen in the correction.
2) Errata: Original comment not addressed - "Clarify what switch "K" for restroom lighting means, and what additional circuiting symbol (box with dot and R) in restrooms mean." You have 3 options a) Revise sheet E1.1 to include the information that these symbols are motion sensors and keyed switches, b) Revise your electrical legend on sheet E3.1 to actually include these symbols into your electrical legend, or, c) send me an email allowing me to pen in the information for our field inspectors and the contractor.
Please be aware that these symbols are not printing into your electrical legend, or I would not have asked for the clarification in the first place. Check your overlays.



If there are questions regarding this review contact:

LeeRay
520-837-4906
LeeRay.Hanly@tucsonaz.gov
09/09/2014 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Coordinate the additional efficiency package selected on the envelope compliance certificate with the mechanical compliance certificate to indicate that the "high efficiency HVAC option" has been selected. [Initial comment: Complete the Envelope Compliance section of the energy calculations for the building envelope to show compliance to Section C401.2, IECC 2012. The output submitted for COMcheck shows "Envelope TBD: Efficiency Option must be specified". Reference: Section 406, IECC 2012.]
2. Comment not resolved. Show how the exterior walls are to be constructed with R-19 insulation both in the wall cavities and continuously. Provide the listing information for the foam roofing material that shows the R-value for 2" of foam roofing. Verify the areas for the exterior walls, the windows, and the doors. The building is located in Tucson, not Phoenix. [Initial comment: Revise the energy code analysis for the building envelope, coordinating the building components used in the analysis with those shown on the drawings. The cavity insulation is shown as R-30 in the building sections, not R-38; the gross wall area is not same number as the roof area. Provide listing information for the foam roofing material that shows the R-value for 2" of foam roofing. Reference: Section C303.1, IECC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.]
3. See mechanical comment #1. [Initial comment: Show that the proposed mechanical systems meet the requirements of Sections C403.2.2, C403.2.3, C403.2, and C403.3 (e.g. provide the mechanical energy code compliance certification from COMcheck). Reference: Section C303.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.]
4. Finish updating the section numbers to match the 2012 IECC by changing items 2, 4, and 5. [Initial comment: The 2012 International Energy Compliance Code is the relevant energy code for this project. Update the IECC notes on sheet M2 to reference the correct code sections.]
5. Provide the structural details that show how the Type I hoods are to be supported from the building structure. [Initial comment: Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I hoods are supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2012 (the hood hanging weight plus the weight of personnel working in or on the hood). Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2012.]
09/15/2014 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change FROM: David Rivera
Principal Planner

PROJECT: T14CM04220
5421 S Calle Santa Cruz
Building plans for the Native New Yorker Restaurant

TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 15, 2014

DUE DATE: October 2, 2014

COMMENTS:

01. Zoning has reviewed the building plans as it relates to the zoning review purview of the building plans and finds that the building plans are in substantial compliance with the current version of the Development Package. However zoning cannot approve the building plans until all comments by other building reviewers have been addressed and the Development Package is approved.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.
09/23/2014 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
10/01/2014 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied The DP must be approved first.