Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T14CM03839
Parcel: 110120910

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL

Permit Number - T14CM03839
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/25/2014 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: 2695 N Craycroft Road
T14CM03839
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 25, 2014

1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve until a development package has been submitted and approved.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956
07/29/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Needs Review .
07/30/2014 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS
1. Where are the calculations for all the details depicted on sheets SE091 and SE092?
2. Keying system basically falls apart after Key 36.
SHEET SE101
3. Where are the calculations for the following columns and footings: C.9/8, C.8/8, C.7/9, C6/9, B7/9, B/8.2, 8.1/A+B, H/6.1.
4. Footing at column lines N.4/8 shows to be existing on the plan and calculations call for a 3 x 3 x ?.
5. Calcs page 61, key 26 calls for a 5 x 5 x 12 footing while the drawings schedule a 4 x 4 x 12.
6. Calcs page 68, Key 31 calls for a 2 angle 4 x 4 x 3/8 and drawing section 14/SE223 shows 1 ledger angle. Is Key 31 to be a lintel or a ledger?
7. Calcs page 70, Key 33 calls for 2 angles 3 x 3 x 3/16 lintel and is not shown on plan.
a. Several other lintels are calculated but not called out on plan.
b. There is no lintel plan.
c. There is no lintel schedule on drawings for new and added to existing lintels.
d. Please provide a lintel plan and schedule and reference to all lintel opening elevations.
8. Calcs page 73, Key 36 calls out for 10K1 joists. These are not scheduled or noted on drawings.
SHEET SE201 AND CALCULATIONS
9. Calcs sheet 53, Key 18 calls for a W 10 x 12 while the drawiwngs schedule a 24LH08.
10. Calcs sheet 59, Key 24 calls for a W21x44 while drawings schedules a W 18 x 35.
END OF REVIEW
07/31/2014 ELEIBOL1 ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change Development Package approval is required prior to bldg permit issuance. - E Leibold P.E.
08/01/2014 FRODRIG2 MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Needs Review