Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T14CM03839
Parcel: 110120910

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T14CM03839
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/23/2014 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: 2695 N Craycroft Road
T14CM03839
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 23, 2014

1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve until a development package has been submitted and approved.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956
06/25/2014 ELEIBOL1 ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change Development Package approval is required prior to bldg permit issuance. Any conflicts with roof runoff, access grades, and elevations for proposed stormdrain and sewer systems shall be resolved prior to Engineering approval of Development Package and Building plans. - E Leibold P.E.
06/26/2014 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change GENERAL
1. The total addition square footage summaries from the demarcation line shown on sheets AS-101, AD-125 and roof plan AE-125 are not consistent:
a. The 8 1/2 x 11 code data sheet indicates the addition to be 13, 854 s.f. in size.
b. Shown on AS101, the new addition is 18,506 s.f.
c. Sheet AD-111 shows a renovation area of 2.839 s.f. and a new addition of 15,667 s.f. However there is an overlap of the renovation area into the new addition demarcation line reference above.
d. A rough scaled calculation was conducted that shows the addition to be approximate 16,000 s.f. plus.
e. Please provide an accurate area summary from the established demarcation line reference to above for the following:
1. Total area of tenant improvements
2. Total area of new addition construction
3. Total area of new covered patios
2. Please provide an accurate accounting of the existing, enclosed building area to be demolished. This can be applied to the impact fees as a credit after the demolition has been completed finalized.
3. A site development package needs to be submitted to zoning for review.
SHEET AE404
4. Detail 1, the shower is non-compliant to ICC A117.1, Section 608.2.1; grab bars, seat and controls.
SHEET AE407
5. Detail 1, There needs to be a 5'-0" dimension from the water closet side wall to the edge of the lavatory. The dimension shown is accurate and the lavatory in encroaching into the water closet clearance. Reference ICC A117.1, Section 604.3.
SHEET AE502
6. Detail 14, partition needs diagonal bracing to structure above.
SHEET SE101
7. Calculation sheet 32 shows a column footing at lines H/8. There is none shown at this location on the foundation plan. Maybe it's the one shown on the plan at lines C9/8? If so, the foundation sizes are not as indicated in the calcs. Please reconcile.
8. Please identify the roof key plan sheet 8 as being a plan for the existing wall openings lintel or beam, column and foundation calculations.
9. Calculation foundation key plan sheet 32 confusing and ambiguous:
a. Foundations shown that are not on foundation plan, reference comment 7.
b. No reference to continuous turn down footing
c. Other circle key references are in accurate and confusing.
d. The key plan itself is confusing and incomplete.
SHEET SE-201
10. The roofing key plan is just as confusing and ambiguous.
11. Please reorganize your calculation foundation and roof framing key plans and resubmit. It might be helpful if you used a reduced copy of the foundation and framing plans from the drawings. Please provide a calculation referencing system in an organized and legible referencing system.
END OF REVIEW
06/27/2014 RONALD BROWN COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Completed
07/01/2014 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Completed
07/01/2014 LEERAY HANLY ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
07/01/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide automatic faucets for the lavatories, dispensing a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
2. Provide tempered water for the lavatories and public hand-washing sinks in restrooms using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. The specified lavatory faucet, L-1, is not listed as complying with ASSE 1070. Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012.
3. Verify that the pipe size called out for the flush valve serving the soiled linen service sink, SS-2, will not result in water velocities greater than that recommended by the pipe manufacturer (e.g. limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for copper piping). The specified flush valve uses 6.5 gallons per flush (not 1.6 GPF) and, based on the branch pipe sizing chart on sheet P301, a 1-1/4" supply is required for the flush valve. Include the hot water fixture units for the sink in the water calculations. Reference: Table 604.3, IPC 2012.
4. Appliances (e.g. ice makers) to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Section 608.13.1, IPC require backflow prevention. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for each water connection. Reference: Sections 608.1 and 608.3, IPC 2012.
5. An approved 2-way cleanout fitting is a single fitting, not a field-assembled group of individual fittings as shown in detail 12/P-401. Reference: Sections 708.3.5 and 708.5, IPC 2012.
6. Architectural details 14/AE-503 and 18/AE-503 show a rectangular scupper that is 12"-wide by 8"-high. Based on a head of 2" (measured 6-feet back from the scupper opening), the scupper is capable of handling a rainwater flow of about 98 GPM or 3,170 square feet of roof area. Per the calculations on sheet P-103, roof drainage areas 1 and 2, totaling 8,232 square feet, are to be drained by a single 12"-wide scupper. Provide calculations to support the scupper design or provide structural calculations to show that the roof is capable of supporting the additional rain load. Reference: Sections 1101.7 and 1106, IPC 2012 and Section 1611.1, IBC 2012.
7. Architectural details 14/AE-503 and 18/AE-503 show an overflow opening in the scupper collector box that is 6"-wide by 4"-high. The bottom of the overflow opening is 4" above the low point of the roof. Revise the size of the overflow opening to have the same capacity as the primary scupper and to avoid overstressing the roof structure. Reference: Sections 1101.7 and 1108.3, IPC 2012 and Section 1611.1, IBC 2012.
07/03/2014 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide the supporting documentation for the performance of the fenestration components as noted in footnote (b), Section 3 of the COMcheck Envelope Compliance Certificate.
2. HP-1 is noted on the COMcheck Mechanical Compliance Certificate as having a 13 SEER but the Heat Pump Schedule on sheet M-001 shows it with a 12.0 SEER. Clarify the energy efficiency ratio for the unit.
3. Provide the refrigerant type and the amount of refrigerant contained in each rooftop packaged heat pump. Verify that the amount of refrigerant serving the institutional occupancy rooms complies with the requirements of Section 1104.2.1, IMC 2012.
07/07/2014 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Approved