Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T14CM03724
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/26/2014 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Based on occupant load proposed, please show required exit signage and egress lighting. |
| 06/27/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: NWC Broadway & Craycroft T14CM03724 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 27, 2014 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve until development package DP14-0078 has been approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 06/27/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET INDEX; APPLICABLE CODES: THE ACCESSIBILITY CODE REFERENCES THE 2003 ANSI. REVISE THE REFERENCE TO THE 2009 EDITION. 2. SHEET INDEX; OCCUPANCY: ACCESSORY USES REFERENCES THE IBC SECTION 508.3.1. REVISE THE REFERENCE TO 508.2. 3. SHEET INDEX; OCCUPANCY: NON-SEPARATED USES REFERENCES THE IBC SECTION 508.3.2. REVISE THE REFERENCE TO 508.3. 4. SHEET INDEX; OCCUPANCY: SEPARATED USES REFERENCES THE IBC SECTION 508.3.3. REVISE THE REFERENCE TO 508.4. 5. SHEET INDEX; TABULAR OCCUPANT AND ACTUAL OCCUPANT LOAD: THE OCCUPANT LOAD REFERENCES THE IBC TABLE 1004.1.1. REVISE THE REFERENCE TO 1004.1.2. 6. SHEET INDEX; EGRESS: THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF EXITS REFERENCES THE IBC SECTION 1019.1. REVISE THE REFERENCE TO 1015. 7. SHEET INDEX; EGRESS: THE ALLOWABLE TRAVEL DISTANCE REFERENCES THE IBC TABLE 1016.1. REVISE THE REFERENCE TO TABLE 1016.2. 8. SHEET INDEX; EGRESS: THE CORRIDOR CONSTRUCTION REFERENCES THE IBC SECTION 1017.1. REVISE THE REFERENCE TO 1018.1. 9. SHEET INDEX; EGRESS: THE MINIMUM CORRIDOR WIDTH REFERENCES THE IBC SECTION 1017.2. REVISE THE REFERENCE TO SECTION 1018.2. 10. SHEET INDEX; EGRESS: THE MAXIMUM DEAD END CORRIDOR REFERENCES THE IBC SECTION 1017.3. REVISE THE REFERENCE TO 1018.4. 11. SHEET S1.0; FOUNDATIONS: NOTE 1 INDICATES A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT WAS USED FOR THE FOUNDATION DESIGN. PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW. 12. SHEET S1.7; DETAIL 20: PROVIDE THE CALCULATION FOR THE LIGHT POLE CAISSON. 13. SHEET S1.7; DETAIL 14: IN NOTES 3 AND 4, ADD THE DETAIL REFERENCE. 14. SHEET S1.8; DETAILS 27 AND 29: DETAIL 27 (AND THE GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES) INDICATES WALL STUDS AT 16" O.C., WHILE DETAIL 29 INDICATES 24" O.C. TYPICAL SPACING. CLARIFY. 15. SHEET S2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 3/9): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE FOOTING (AT GRIDS 1-A) SHOULD BE AN 8'X11'X2'-6", WHILE THE FOUNDATION PLAN INDICATES AN F3 (8'X11'X2'-0"). CLARIFY. 16. SHEET S2.0; KEYNOTES: NOTES 4 AND 5 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLANS. VERIFY. 17. SHEET S2.0; FOUNDATION PLAN: FOR THE FOOTINGS AT GRIDS A-2 AND A-3, PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FROM THE COLUMN CENTERLINE TO THE EDGE OF THE FOOTING NEAR THE PROPERTY LINE. 18. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 103: IS THIS DETAIL PERTINENT TO THIS SET OF PLANS? VERIFY. 19. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 102 (NOTE 4): IS THE STEM WALL CONCRETE OR MASONRY (OR CONTRACTOR'S CHOICE)? PROVIDE REINFORCEMENT NOTES FOR THE STEM WALL REGARDLESS OF THE MATERIAL. 20. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 104: NOTE 1 INDICATES THE CENTERLINE OF THE COLUMN AND THE FOOTING. THIS IS NOT THE CASE AT THE PROPERTY LINE. CLARIFY. 21. SHEET S3.0; DETAILS 102 AND 104: BOTH DETAILS INDICATE THE EXTERIOR SHEATHING MATERIAL AND ATTACHMENT 'AS OCCURS'. PROVIDE A DETAIL OR NOTE INDICATING THE SHEATHING SPECIFICATION AND CONNECTION TO THE STUD WALLS. 22. SHEET S4.0; DETAIL 201: REVISE OR OMIT NOTE 9. 23. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; WALL EYEBROW DESIGN: PROVIDE A DETAIL ON THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS, AS WELL AS ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN, INDICATING THE STRUCTURAL FRAMING PER THE CALCULATIONS. 24. SHEET A1.1; EAST SIDE ELEVATION 4: THE SECTION CUTS 2/A5.1 AND 3/A5.1 SHOULD BE NOTED AS 'SIMILAR'. 25. SHEET A5.1; KEYED NOTES: NOTE 11 INDICATES TO REFER TO THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR THE EXTERIOR SHEATHING. NO SHEATHING NOTE WAS LOCATED ON THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. COORDINATE. 26. SHEET A5.1; SECTIONS 1, 2, AND 3: THESE SECTIONS INDICATE A MASONRY STEM WALL, WHILE THE STRUCTURAL DETAIL 102 (NOTE 4) INDICATES A CONCRETE OR CMU STEM WALL, AND PROVIDES A 6" STEM WIDTH. COORDINATE. 27. SHEET A5.1; WALL SECTIONS 2 AND 3: KEYED NOTE 23 INDICATES TO SEE THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR THE WALL EYEBROW. NOTHING WAS LOCATED ON THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. COORDINATE. 28. SHEET A5.1; KEYED NOTES: NOTE 17 INDICATES TO REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR MORE INFORMATION. ARE THERE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT? CLARIFY AND PROVIDE AS REQUIRED. 29. SHEETS A5.1, A5.2, AND A5.3; KEYED NOTES: NOTES 15 AND 16 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE SECTIONS. VERIFY. 30. SHEET A5.3; WALL SECTION 1: INDICATE IN A NOTE ON THE SECTION THE SIZE OF THE HORIZONTAL BLOCKING AND IT'S CONNECTION TO THE WALL STUDS AT THE LOCATION OF THE LADDER THRU BOLTS (NOTE 29). 31. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 06/30/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 07/07/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 07/07/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 07/07/2014 | LHANLY1 | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 07/07/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 07/10/2014 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Will approve the building plan upon approval of the DP Package DP14-0078. JG |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/24/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |