Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T14CM03512
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/10/2014 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Please indicate that the 2012 IFC with local amendments is a code to be used. 2. Please indicate the classification of alteration per the 2012 IEBC that is indicated on the plans. 3. Section 603 of the IEBC is not justification for not installing a fire sprinkler system. Additional review can occur following the resubmittal of drawings indicating the correct alteration level.-KRB |
| 06/12/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD Zoning Review Transmittal TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: T14CM03512 604 N. 6th Avenue TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 12, 2014 Proposed Project: Interior Remodel with addition of exterior accessible ramps COMMENTS: Historic review required due to exterior work. This site is located in the HC-1 zone (UDC 4.7.20). Religious Useis a permitted use in this zone. TABLE 4.8-4: PERMITTED USES - COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USEZONES If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov (520) 837-4956 |
| 06/18/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET G1; CODE REVIEW CHECKLIST: THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION REFERENCES TABLE 601. REVISE THE REFERENCE TO THE 2012 IBC. 2. SHEET G1; CODE REVIEW CHECKLIST: THE MINIMUM EXITS REFERENCES TABLE 1021.2(2). REVISE THE REFERENCE TO THE 2012 IBC. 3. SHEET G1; CODE REVIEW CHECKLIST: THE SHAFT ENCLOSURE FIRE RESISTIVE REQUIREMENT IS REFERENCED TO SECTION 707.4. REVISE THE REFERENCE TO THE 2012 IBC. 4. SHEET G1; CODE REVIEW CHECKLIST: THE LIGHTED EXIT SIGN REFERENCES SECTION 1011.1. REVISE THE REFERENCE TO THE 2012 IBC. 5. SHEET G1; CODE REVIEW CHECKLIST: REFERENCE IS MADE THAT SECTION 1011.1 ALLOWS EXIT SIGNS NOT TO BE LIGHTED. THE SECTION 1011.3 ACTUALLY DOES REQUIRE THE EXIT SIGNS TO BE LIGHTED. CLARIFY AND NOTE ON THE PLAN. 6. SHEETS D1, D2, AND D3; DEMOLITION PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTES 8 AND 16 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLANS. VERIFY. 7. SHEETS D1, D2, AND D3; DEMOLITION PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTES 4.1 AND 4.2 INDICATE TO SEE SHEETS A2.2 AND A3.2 FOR DOOR REMOVAL AND REUSE. PROVIDE SPECIFIC KEYNOTE REFERENCES IN THESE NOTES. 8. SHEET D3; DEMOLITION PLAN KEYNOTES: ADD THE REMAINING KEYNOTES TO THIS LIST. 9. SHEETS A1.2, A2.2, AND A3.2; KEY NOTES: NOTE 21 INDICATES TO 'SEE DETAILS FOR NEW RAILING'. PROVIDE A SPECIFIC DETAIL REFERENCE IN THIS NOTE. 10. SHEET A1.2, A2.2, AND A3.2; KEY NOTES: NOTE 11 INDICATES TO 'SEE DETAIL FOR STAIR RENOVATION'. PROVIDE A SPECIFIC DETAIL REFERENCE IN THIS NOTE. 11. SHEETS A1.2, A2.2, AND A3.2; KEY NOTES: NOTE 40 INDICATES TO MODIFY STAIRS 'PER ENLARGED DETAIL'. PROVIDE A SPECIFIC DETAIL REFERENCE IN THIS NOTE. 12. SHEETS A1.2, A2.2, AND A3.2; WALL TYPES: WALL 8 INDICATES TO 'SEE DETAILS' FOR THE WALL CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE SPECIFIC DETAIL REFERENCES IN THIS NOTE. 13. SHEETS A1.2, A2.2, AND A3.2; KEY NOTES: THERE ARE MANY KEY NOTES INDICATED THAT WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLANS. VERIFY. 14. SHEETS A1.2, A2.2, AND A3.2; WALL TYPES: FOR THE INTERIOR PARTITION WALLS THAT DO NOT EXTEND TO THE STRUCTURE ABOVE, PROVIDE A DETAIL INDICATING A DIAGONAL BRACE SIZE AND SPACING, AND THE CONNECTION OF THE BRACE TO THE TOP OF THE WALL AND TO THE STRUCTURE ABOVE. 15. SHEET A2.2; MAIN FLOOR PLAN: THE SECTION 2/A7 CUT ON THE PLAN (EAST/WEST) IS INCORRECT. REVISE THE SHEET REFERENCE. 16. SHEET A4 (ATTIC CEILING FLOOR PLAN); SHEET S2.3 (CEILING FRAMING PLAN): THE CATWALK LAYOUT IS DIFFERENT ON THESE TWO SHEETS. COORDINATE. 17. SHEET A4 (ATTIC CEILING FLOOR PLAN); SHEET S2.3 (CEILING FRAMING PLAN): SHEET A4 INDICATES 2X10 @ 24" O.C. ARE TO BE PLACED ACROSS THE TOP OF THE EXISTING 2X6 CEILING FRAMING AT THE CATWALK, WHILE SHEET S2.3 INDICATES NO ACCESSORY FRAMING. COORDINATE AND ADD A CONNECTION NOTE FOR THE NEW 2X10 TO THE EXISTING 2X6. 18. SHEET A5; ROOF PLAN: NOTE 7 INDICATES A NEW RAILING ON THE ROOF. FINISH THE NOTE AND PROVIDE A DETAIL INDICATING THE TUBE SIZE, SPACING, AND CONNECTION TO THE ROOF. 19. SHEET A8; SOUTH AND WEST RAMP ELEVATIONS: PROVIDE A DETAIL INDICATING THE RAILING MEMBER SIZES, SPACING, AND CONNECTION AT THE BASE. 20. SHEET S2.0; FRAMING KEYNOTES: NOTE 2 INDICATES MECHANICAL WEIGHTS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. THERE ARE NO WEIGHTS INDICATED. VERIFY. 21. SHEET S2.0; FLOOR FRAMING PLAN: A NOTE AT THE MAIN SANCTUARY INDICATES 'UNITS HUNG FROM FRAMING BELOW MAIN SANCTUARY DO NOT REQUIRE STRUCTURAL STRENGTHENING'. THERE ARE EIGHT OTHER UNITS INDICATED OUTSIDE THE MAIN SANCTUARY AREA. DOES THE STRUCTURAL SYSTEM AT THESE EIGHT UNITS REQUIRE MODIFICATION? VERIFY. 22. SHEETS S2.1, S2.2, AND S2.4; FRAMING KEYNOTES: NOTE 1 INDICATES MECHANICAL WEIGHTS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. THERE ARE NO WEIGHTS INDICATED. CLARIFY. 23. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: WERE THE EXISTING ATTIC CEILING JOISTS (2X6) CHECKED STRUCTURALLY FOR THE NEW CATWALK AND INSULATION LOAD? VERIFY. 24. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 06/27/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Verify the scope of work for this activity. On sheet A1.2, the kitchen is noted as being separately permitted and no kitchen drawings have been included in this drawing set but the mechanical and plumbing designs appear to include the kitchen installation. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. The International Plumbing Code, 2012, is the controlling code for this activity, not the 2006 International Plumbing Code (see Section 15000, sheet M9.6). Reference: Section 101, IBC 2012. 3. Specify the materials to be used for the drainage piping and fittings. Reference: Section 702, IPC 2012. 4. Sheet M3.7 shows a 2" DCW leaving (?) the building at three locations: clarify what is happening to these pipes. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 5. Revise the design of the lift station to provide access for the check and full-open valves outside of the sump. Reference: Section 712.2, IPC 2012. 6. Verify that the maximum effluent level in the sump is at least 2" below the invert of the gravity inlet. Reference: Section 712.3.4, IPC 2012. 7. Verify that the automatic grease removal device has "ready access" for inspection and cleaning (i.e. the unit can be reached "without removal or movement of any panel, door, or similar obstruction"). Reference: Section 1003.3.5, IPC 2012. 8. Provide a vent downstream of the proposed grease interceptor (note the proposed model has an integral flow control plate and does not require an additional exterior flow control device). Reference: Sections 1003.3.5 and 1003.9, IPC 2012. 9. Clarify the intent of keynote 1 on sheet M3.10. Is the, "min of 7.0 WC in", to be measured at the meter or at the existing AC units? Southwest Gas, the local gas utility, provides natural gas at 7" WG, 2 PSIG, and 5 PSIG. Appliances needing gas service at 7" WG or greater will require a gas meter that delivers at least 2 PSIG gas into a regulator located after the meter set. Reference: Section 402.1, IFGC 2012. 10. Show the sizes of the pipes serving the proposed gas-fired appliances, G30 and G32. Reference: Section 402.1, IFGC 2012. 11. If the natural gas is being delivered with a maximum pressure drop of 0.5" WC, revise the size of the natural gas pipe serving the appliances, G30 and G32 per Table 402.4 (2). Reference: Section 402.4, IFGC 2012. |
| 06/27/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide the size and location of the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly (only a pressure reducing valve, PRV, is shown). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 06/30/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The split-system heat pump schedule (M9.1) refers to notes 6-10 for all of the outside units. Provide notes 7-10. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012. 3. HP-8, with an EER of 11.6, does not meet the required efficiency increase to avoid the need for an economizer, Section 403.3.1 (exception 6), IECC 2012. 4. Clarify the balancing criteria for the exhaust from rooms 129 and 131. EF-8 is scheduled for an air flow rate of 875 CFM but the plans show a total of only 800 CFM to be exhausted from both rooms. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 5. Clarify the required exhaust air flow rate for hood HO-1 and the supply air flow rate make-up air unit MAU-1. On sheet M9.2, the hood is scheduled for 1500 CFM of exhaust with 1400 CFM of supply air but on sheet M9.2, the exhaust fan for the hood, EF-1, calls for an exhaust air flow rate of only 1225 CFM. Also, the make-up air schedule on sheet M9.2 shows MAU-1 delivering only 1125 CFM to the kitchen for make-up air. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 6. Clarify the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fans: show that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2012. 7. Show how adequate make-up air is to be provided to the room so that the room pressure remains essentially neutral. Reference: Sections 501.4, 507.2.1.2, and 508.1, IMC 2012. |
| 07/01/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plan review has been completed and the following corrections are required. Please provide a written response to comments with plan re-submittal. 1) PP E1.1 Provide occupancy sensors and light reduction controls as required by the 2012 IECC. (Reference IECC sections C405.2.2.2 & C405.2.1.2) 2) PP E1.2 Provide occupancy sensors and light reduction controls as required by the 2012 IECC for the offices and nursery (Reference IECC sections C405.2.2.2 & C405.2.1.2) Provide automatic light controls for other areas as required by IECC C405.2.2.1 3) PP E1.3 Provide occupancy sensors and light reduction controls as required by the 2012 IECC for the offices, library, break room (Reference IECC sections C405.2.2.2 & C405.2.1.2) Provide automatic light controls for other areas as required by IECC C405.2.2.1 4) PP E1.4 Provide automatic light controls as required by IECC C405.2.2.1 5) PP E2.1 A) could only locate 3 receptacles for PL2-2, not the 6 indicated in panel schedule. B) There are 3 receptacles in lobby 107 labeled "PL2-12" but that ckt is labeled as spare in the panel schedule. 6) PP E.2. A) panel PM1 on pp E5.3 has missing loads for ckt 2. B) circuiting for rooms 234, 235 is mislabeled, should be ckt'd to PM3-11. 7) PP E2.3 A) special receptacle in room 304 ckt'd to PU2-16,18 not accounted for in panel. B) GFI receptacles shown on PU2-2 in café are not accounted for in panel. C) load on PU1-13 room U9 not accounted for in panel. D) loads to PU1-10 room U13 not accounted for in panel. 8) PP E2.5 circuits to AC1 mislabeled, should be PU1-32.34 9) PP E2.10 A) There are 4 receps circuited to PL5-5 but panel schedule has single microwave load of 1500va, clarify. B) PL5-2 and PL5-17 seem to be mislabeled in panel. 10) Panel Schedules: There are loads indicated in the following panel schedules that could not be located in plans. PM4-7, PU-23, PL5-4, PL5-6, PL1-14, PL1-20, PL2-15, PL4-9 thru PL4-42, PU2-6, PU2-8, 11) Panel schedule for PA3 has ckt 4 labeled, but has no load on it. If there are questions regarding this review contact: LeeRay 520-837-4906 LeeRay.Hanly@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/02/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |