Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T14CM03129
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/14/2014 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 07/22/2014 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Approval of DP14-0088 is required. |
| 07/22/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET CVR2: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE NOTES. 2. PREVIOUS COMMENT 3: DID NOT REVISE THE VERBIAGE TO 3/32" IN HEIGHT. 3. SHEET SD1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE VERBIAGE. 4. SHEETS A0.0, A0.1, A0.2, AND A1.0: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE BOXED NOTE, DEMOLITION KEYNOTES, AND LEGEND. 5. SHEET A1.1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE RESTROOM GENERAL NOTES. 6. SHEET A1.2: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE BOXED NOTE IN THE KITCHEN. 7. SHEET A1.3: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE BOXED NOTE AND ROOF PLAN KEYNOTES. 8. SHEETS A2.0, A2.1, A2.2, AND A2.3: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE BOXED NOTES AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SHEET. 9. PREVIOUS COMMENT 17: A DETAIL OR NOTE ADDRESSING THE BRACING SIZE AND SPACING TO THE TOP OF THE PARTITION WALL, ALONG WITH THE CONNECTION SIZE AND QUANTITY TO THE TOP OF THE PARTITION AND TO THE STRUCTURE ABOVE, WAS NOT ADDED AS REQUESTED. 10. SHEETS A3.2 AND A4.0: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE DETAIL VERBIAGE. 11. SHEETS A5.0, A5.1, A5.2, AND A5.3: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE DETAIL VERBIAGE AND WALL ASSEMBLY NOTES. 12. SHEET A6.0: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE BOXED NOTES AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SHEET. 13. PREVIOUS COMMENT 21: THE SHEET SIZE IS STILL 24" X 36", AND MUCH OF THE LETTERING IS LESS THAN 3/32". 14. PREVIOUS COMMENT 22: THE IBC SECTION REFERENCE STILL INDICATES 1804.2 ON THE DRAWING. 15. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 07/29/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The water isometrics show a 1" water supply to one of the flush valve water closets (WC-1) and 1-1/2" supplies to the other two flush valve water closets (WC-2). At a minimum design flow rate of 25 GPM for a siphonic, flush-valve water closet, a 1" Type L copper pipe has a flow velocity of 9.7 FPS. Revise the size of the supply to WC-1 to reduce the water velocity to less than 8 feet per second. Reference: Table 604.3, IPC 2012. [Initial comment: Provide plumbing plans for the new work, including water isometrics and waste and vent isometrics. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 2. Clarify the termination of the primary roof drain from the tower. [Initial comment: The modified tower is shown on sheet A1.3 with roof drains discharging to the main roof. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans for the new tower roof. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012.] 3. Sheet A2.2 has been revised to indicate that the rain gutter and rain water leaders exist but Sheet A5.0 still calls for a new rain gutter and rain water leaders; which is correct? In addition, the roof drawing on sheet A1.3 shows the main roof sloping down to the north towards the location of the rain gutter but roof drains are shown at the south end of the roof. Clarify the roof design; is there a ridge somewhere on the roof that is not shown? [Initial comment: Architectural sheets A2.2 and A5.0 indicate that a new rain gutter and two rain leaders are being added to the north side of the building. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans for the new gutter and rain leaders. Reference: Sections 1101 and 1106, IPC 2012.] |
| 07/29/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/08/2014 | SHANAE POWELL | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/08/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |