Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T14CM03012
Parcel: 112060080

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T14CM03012
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/22/2014 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: 2626 N. Campbell Ave
T14CM03012
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 22, 2014

1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. As this project is a change of use, Animal Services to Administrative and Professional Office, and the required vehicle parking for Office is more intense, provide one of the following with your next submittal
Copy of the last approved site plan that demonstrates that the vehicle parking meets code requirements for Administrative Office
Copy of the notarized 10835 Affidavit.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with vehicle parking requirments. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956
05/22/2014 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied The fire department has no records of either fire sprinklers or alarms in this building. None are required. If sprinklers and/or alarms do not exist, remove ALL references to sprinklers and alarms. Also. change General Building Summary table.
05/27/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. The International Plumbing Code, 2012, is the controlling code for this structure, not the International Residential Code. Remove all references to the IRC from the drawings and update the water and waste fixture unit calculations. Reference: Section 101.2, IPC 2012.
2. Provide material standards for the shower and the mop sink. Include the material standards for the shower faucet and its mixing valve. Reference: Sections 303.4, 402, 424.3, and 424.5, IPC 2012.
3. Provide automatic faucets for the lavatories, dispensing a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
4. For the use of PEX tubing, provide a branch tube sizing chart showing the correct size of PEX tubing to be used as a substitute for the copper pipe shown on the drawings. Reference: Sections 303.2 and 604.3, IPC 2012.
5. Provide tempered water for the lavatories and public hand-washing sinks in restrooms using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012.
6. Verify the presence of a device to control the pressure of the water heater storage tank caused by thermal expansion (e.g. an expansion tank). Reference: Section 607.3.2, IPC 2012.
7. Provide cleanouts for the existing 3" horizontal drain located in the hall; the cleanouts shall be sized per Section 708.7, IPC 2012 and shall open to allow cleaning in the direction of flow. Reference: Sections 708.3.1 and 708.5, IPC 2012.
8. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole and the first floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
9. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans for the new covered entry, including overflow protection for the roof. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012.
05/28/2014 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum height of 3/32-inch. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
2. Revise the mechanical general notes to include only those notes that pertain to this activity. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
3. Finish labeling the air flow for the southern diffuser in the waiting room. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
4. Provide a detail to show how the return grille for the 3-ton rooftop unit is to be installed in the bearing wall. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
5. Demonstrate energy code compliance for the alterations to the building envelope based on the 2012 IECC. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the modified or new envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.5, and C103.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.
6. Show that the new rooftop units meet the requirements of Sections C403.2.2, C403.2.3, C403.2, and C403.3 (e.g. provide the mechanical energy code compliance certification from COMcheck). Reference: Section C303.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.
7. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012.
8. Show that each rooftop unit has a thermostatic control that provides for off-hour and set-back control, automatic shutdown and start-up control and, if the control does not require manual changeover from the heating and cooling modes, restricts set point overlap. Reference: Section C403.2.4, IECC 2012.
9. Provide automatic shutoff dampers for the outdoor air supply and exhaust ducts. Reference: Section C403.2.4.4, IECC 2012.
10. Show the location of the temperature controls for each heat pump. Reference: Section C403.2.4, IECC 2012.
11. Provide structural calculations and details to demonstrate that the installation of the two new rooftop units will not adversely affect the structural integrity of the roof. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2012.
12. Revise the air balancing information for the two rooftop units to show that the equipment is being installed in accordance with the conditions of its listing and the manufacturer's installation requirements (i.e. the total air flow shown on the plans for each unit is within the manufacturer's allowable air flow range for each unit). Reference: Section 304.1, IMC 2012.
13. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains for the two rooftop units. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson.
14. Provide the manufacturer's equipment data for the exhaust fans. Reference: Sections 301 and 304.1, IMC 2012.
15. Provide information on the sequence of operation for the restroom and shower room exhaust fans to show that all of the air supplied to the rooms will be exhausted (i.e. the exhaust fans shall run continuously during the time the building is occupied). Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2012.
16. Ventilation for restrooms in public spaces requires a minimum of 50 CFM of mechanical exhaust per water closet or urinal if the exhaust is continuous and 70 CFM if the exhaust is intermittent. All of the air supplied to the restroom by the HVAC system shall be exhausted, even if it is in excess of the minimum exhaust requirements. Reference: footnotes e and g, Table 403.3, IMC 2012.
17. Ventilation for shower rooms in public spaces requires a minimum of 20 CFM of mechanical exhaust per shower head if the exhaust is continuous and 50 CFM if the exhaust is intermittent. All of the air supplied to the shower room by the HVAC system shall be exhausted, even if it is in excess of the minimum exhaust requirements. Reference: footnotes f and g, Table 403.3, IMC 2012.
18. The 3-ton rooftop unit distributes air to multiple occupancy types, not just to offices. Provide calculations to show that the ventilation system is sized in accordance with Section 403.3, IMC 2012; for HVAC systems serving multiple zones, see Section 403.3.2.3, IMC 2012.
19. Provide an air balancing report prior to the final mechanical inspection to verify that the HVAC systems are capable of supplying and exhausting at least the minimum air flow rates called for in the design drawings. The balancing shall be performed in accordance with the procedural standards of either the National Environmental Balancing Bureau (NEBB) or the Associated Air Balance Council (AABC). Reference: Section 403.7, IMC 2012.
05/28/2014 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Reqs Change Provide the size of the water meter and the size of the reduced pressure backflow prevention assembly serving this building. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
06/09/2014 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. SHEET CS-1; CODE REVIEW CHECKLIST; WORK SCOPE: VERIFY IF THE SPACE IS SPRINKLERED.
2. SHEET A-1; EXISTING FLOOR PLAN: A BOXED NOTE INDICATES THERE IS 416 SF OF OUTSIDE WORK. CLARIFY WITH A NOTE OR REFERENCE (SHEET A-2 OR A-3) WHAT THIS OUTSIDE WORK INVOLVES.
3. SHEET A-3; FLOOR PLAN: PER THE IBC SECTION 2902.2, SEPARATE FACILITIES FOR EACH SEX ARE REQUIRED (MORE THAN 15 EMPLOYEES AND CUSTOMERS TOTAL). REVISE PLAN.
4. SHEET A-4; FLOOR PLAN: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE ELEVATION INDICATORS.
5. SHEET A-4; FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE J REEFERENCES SHEET A-12 FOR RESTROOM DETAILS. REVISE THE REFERENCE.
6. SHEET A-5: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE NEW WALL FLOOR PLAN ROOM NAMES.
7. SHEET A-6 (REFLECTED CEILING PLAN); SHEET S-2 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN): KEYNOTE 5 ON SHEET A-6 INDICATES A 6X10 BEAM, WHILE SHEET S-2 INDICATES A 4X12 BEAM (B1). CLARIFY.
8. SHEET A-6 (REFLECTED CEILING PLAN); SHEET S-2 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN): KEYNOTE 3 ON SHEET A-6 INDICATES A 2X8 FASCIA, WHILE SHEET S-2 (DETAIL 3) INDICATES A 2X10 FASCIA. CLARIFY.
9. SHEET A-9; RESTROOM DETAILS: SEE NOTE 3 ABOVE FOR THE REQUIRED SEPARATE FACILITIES.
10. SHEET S-1; FOUNDATION PLAN: THE FOOTING SCHEDULE INDICATES NEW FOOTINGS F-3 AND F-5. WHERE ARE THESE LOCATED ON THE PLAN?
11. SHEET S-1; DETAIL 2: THE TITLE INDICATES AN INTERIOR POST, BUT THE DETAIL IS CUT AT THE EXTERIOR. CLARIFY.
12. SHEET S-1; DETAIL 4: THE DETAIL INDICATES A CONCRETE SLAB ENDING AT NATURAL GRADE. SHOULD THIS BE A NEW SLAB ENDING AT AN EXISTING BUILDING SLAB? VERIFY.
13. SHEET S-1; FOUNDATION PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE G WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
14. SHEET S-1 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET S-2 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN): DETAIL 2 ON SHEET S-1 INDICATES TO SEE THE FRAMING PLAN FOR THE POST. ON SHEET S-2, KEYNOTE E (AT THE POSTS) INDICATES B.U. POST AS REQUIRED. PROVIDE A DETAIL OR NOTE FOR THE POST CONSTRUCTION.
15. SHEET S-1 OR S-2: SHOW THE SHEAR WALLS ON THE PLAN.
16. SHEET S-2; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: PROVIDE A NORTH ARROW ON THE PLAN.
17. SHEET S-2; DETAILS 1 AND 2: INDICATE THE EXISTING ROOF JOISTS ON THESE DETAILS.
18. SHEET S-2; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: AT THE COVERED ENTRY, NEW H-3 BEAMS ARE INDICATED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES. NO H-3 BEAM IS IN THE SCHEDULE. PROVIDE.
19. SHEET S-2; FRAMING PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTES F, G, I, J, M, AND R ARE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
20. SHEET S-2; GENERAL FRAMING NOTES: NOTE 7 INDICATES TO SEE THE SHEAR WALL SCHEDULE FOR WALL NAILING. WHERE IS THE SHEAR WALL SCHEDULE LOCATED?
21. SHEET S-2; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: WHAT DOES THE FRAMING IN THE ADMINISTRATION AREA INDICATE? CLARIFY.
22. SHEET S-2; DESIGN CRITERIA NOTES: NOTE D INDICATES A SOIL REPORT WAS USED ON THIS PRO9JECT. PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW.
23. SHEET S-2: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE VERBIAGE IN DETAILS 4, 5, AND 6.
24. SHEET S-2; HEADER SCHEDULE: DARKEN THE VERBIAGE AND NUMBERS IN THE SCHEDULE.
25. SHEET S-3; DETAIL 3: CUT THIS SECTION ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN.
26. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; PAGE 25: WHERE IS THE BEAM AT THE EXISTING WING WALL (3-2X14 OR 5 1/8" X 9" GLULAM) LOCATED ON SHEET S-2? VERIFY. THE PAGE IN THE CALCULATIONS BEFORE 54 INDICATES THIS BEAM IS LOCATED WHERE THE S-2 BEAMS ARE ON SHEET S-2.
27. GENERAL: WOULD THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OF RECORD REVIEW THE DRAWINGS S-1, S-2, AND S-3, AND STAMP THEM INDICATING THAT HE HAS REVIEWED THE DRAWINGS FOR CONFORMANCE TO HIS CALCULATIONS.
28. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
06/13/2014 LEERAY HANLY ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Plan review has been completed and the following corrections are required. Please provide a written response to comments with plan re-submittal.

1) Provide available fault current calculations, and specify bracing for each panel. If panels B & C are to be series rated then specify manufacturer and labeling of each panel. Ref NEC 110.10
2) Revise plans to show compliance with International Energy Code section C405. Specifically light reduction controls, Automatic time switch controls, and Occupancy sensors. (note that occupancy sensors could exempt you from light reduction and time switch requirements)
3) IECC lighting calculations pp E-2 begin with an incorrect assumption that the 2012 IECC allows 1.5 watts/ft for lighting. Coordinate allowed lighting calculations with either table C405.5.2(1) or table C405.5.2(2)
4) Coordinate lighting plan with IECC lighting calculations. Indicate on lighting plan which luminaires are type A,B,C, etc. Ref IBC section 107.2.1
5) Provide sufficient information to show that luminaires under canopy meet the requirements of the Outdoor Lighting Code (for example, if they are full cutoff fixtures then they are exempt from the lumen calculations for the site, but the color temperature must still be 3500K or less) Ref OLC sect 104.2
6) Provide a sequence of operation for restroom exhaust fans so that no more than 10% of any supply air to these rooms is recirculated into occupied space. (This may be done by switching the exhaust with a timer set to be on whenever the space is occupied). Ref IMC section 403.2.1


If there are questions regarding this review contact:

LeeRay
520-837-4906
LeeRay.Hanly@tucsonaz.gov

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/16/2014 SHANAE POWELL OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
06/16/2014 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed