Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T14CM02729
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 330 W. Nebraska Street T14CM02729 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 10, 2014 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve until development package, DP14-0074 has been approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 10/10/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | P&DS TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields, Lead Planner PROJECT: T14CM02729 & DP14-0074 Vida Nueva - Addition 330 W. Nebraska Street TRANSMITTAL: October 31, 2014 COMMENTS: the following comments are relative to an application for a Design Development Option (DDO) (UDC 3.11.1). A portion of this site is located in the R-2 zone (UDC 4.7.9). Religious Use is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2). 1. Per UDC TABLE 6.3-2.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE R-1, R-2, R-3, MH-1, & MH-2 ZONES, Nonres Use to Res Zone the required perimeter yard setback from the proposed addition, canopy addition, to the west property line is 10' or ¾ the height of the exterior wall, which ever is greatest, measured from grade to the highest point of the wall. That said based on a wall height of 23'-5" the required perimeter yard setback from the porch cover to the west property line is 17'-6", proposed perimeter yard based on a 2'-6" overhang is 3'-6". 2. Per UDC TABLE 6.3-2.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE R-1, R-2, R-3, MH-1, & MH-2 ZONES, Nonres Use to Res Zone the required perimeter yard setback from the proposed addition to the west property line is 10' or ¾ the height of the exterior wall, which ever is greatest, measured from grade to the highest point of the wall. That said based on a wall height of 29'-9" the required perimeter yard setback from the entry exterior wall to the west property line is 22'-4", proposed perimeter yard is 20'-0". The Building plan and development package cannot be approve until the DDO is approved. |
| 10/13/2014 | CPIERCE1 | WWM | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 10/21/2014 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | GENERAL 1. Provide existing/demolition plan. 2. Provide total square footage of the covered entrance and patio areas. SHEET T 3. On the drawings, provide the occupancy load of the entire existing facilities prior to additions and alterations. Not just the sanctary seating. a. Include the occupant load calculation for the existing building with only the interior modifications. Do not include the addition. Use the actual seat count in the sanctuary assembly seating area. b. Provide the occupancy load for just the addition. SHEET A1.1 4. Reverse the toilet genger names. 5. Provide the door numbers for all the new additions just north of the new entry. 6. No exits lights are shown on sheet E2 for all the new exit doors. Please reconcile. 7. The new audio/visual booth is not accessible. 8. Show roof drain down spouts and where they exit. SHEET A3.1 9. Where do the roof drain pipes exit from the building? Please show. SHEET A4.1 10. Show roof drains exiting from the building. SHEET S3.0 11. Calculations call for DLT1 to be a (2) 8"x14" guage steel stud lintel. The drawings show 2-2 X 12s. 12. Calculations call for DLT2 to be a (2) 6"x16" guage steel stud lintel. The drawings show 2-2 X 12s. 13. L2, 4 X 10 on drawings is not calculated. END OF REVIEW |
| 10/24/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 10/24/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise the stated scale on the plumbing floor plans on sheets P1, P2, and P3 from ¼": 1'-0" to 1/8": 1'-0". Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Provide the minimum plumbing facilities required by Table 2902.1 and Section 2902.2, IBC 2012, for assembly occupancy. 3. The specified temperature mixing valve for fixture P1, Watts model L111, is an obsolete product that was listed as conforming to ASSE 1069 and ASSE 1070, not ASSE 1016 (it also conflicts with the mixing valve noted in detail 204). Revise the specifications to provide a currently-listed product that conforms to the correct ASSE standard so that an incorrect mixing valve is not substituted. Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012. 4. Clarify the reason for the total number of water fixture units being 167 in the plumbing schedule while the water calculations show a total of 182 water fixture units. Reference: Section 604.3, IPC 2012. 5. Revise the water calculations using a pressure drop across the existing reduced pressure backflow assembly that corresponds to a value that is reasonable for that type of assembly. Reference: Section 604.1, IPC 2012. 6. Provide the basis for the pipe sizing chart. Based on Figure E103.3 (3), IPC 2012, the pipe sizes appear to result in pressure losses greater than indicated in you water calculations even if the pressure drop for the reduced pressure backflow assembly is not corrected. Verify the pipe sizes used for the addition. 7. Correct the source of the hot water for the lavatories in the new men's restroom - the partial water isometric shows them supplied from the hot water return pipe. (Also, consider renaming the detail). 8. The developed length of the hot water supply piping beyond the point where the hot water return piping begins appears to be greater than fifty feet; provide a method for maintaining the temperature of the hot water supply system in the kitchen area. Reference: Section 607.2, IPC 2012. 9. Verify that the new section of the building sewer will have a maximum of 100-feet between cleanouts. Reference: Section 708.3.1, IPC 2012. 10. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole and the actual first floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 11. Indirect waste piping that has a developed length greater than 30-inches (30") when measured horizontally or greater than 54-inches (54") in total developed length shall be trapped. Exception: indirect waste piping conveying only clear-water waste (e.g. effluent from an ice bin) does not require a trap. Reference: Section 802.2, IPC 2012. 12. Provide roof drainage calculations (i.e. the roof areas and contributing vertical walls for each roof drain location) and show the roof drain and downspout dimensions on the plans. Show how and where the downspouts are to be terminated. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012. 13. If the manufacturer does not incorporate a sediment trap within the gas-fired equipment (e.g. the A/C units), provide a sediment trap downstream of the appliance shut off valve, as close to the equipment as possible. Reference: Section 408.4, IFGC 2012. |
| 10/24/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Demonstrate energy code compliance for the addition to the building envelope using calculations based on the current code. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation. Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.5, and C103.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 2. Show that the mechanical systems for the building comply with the current energy code (e.g. provide the COMcheck Mechanical Compliance Certificate). 3. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012. 4. Verify that the parapet height within ten feet of the new mechanical equipment on the roof is at least 42" above the walking surface of the roof or provide guards per Section 304.11, IMC 2012. 5. Show how maintenance access is provided to mechanical equipment located on the roof. Access shall not require negotiating obstacles greater than 30" in height. Reference: Section 306.5, IMC 2012. 6. Footnote b on Table 403.3 states that mechanical exhaust is required for the kitchen Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2012. 7. Provide a Type I hood over the gas-fired range and a Type I or a Type II hood over any other cooking or heat-producing appliances. Reference: Sections 507.1 and 507.2, IMC 2012. 8. Revise the mechanical design for AC-17 as required to avoid using the corridor as a return air duct. Reference: Section 601.2, IMC 2012. |
| 10/30/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plan review has been completed and the following corrections are required. Please provide a written response to comments with plan re-submittal. 1) Provide occupancy sensors for per 2012 IECC section C405.2.2.2 2) Provide emergency egress lighting and exit signage with battery backups per IBC section 1006 If there are questions regarding this review contact: LeeRay 520-837-4906 LeeRay.Hanly@tucsonaz.gov |