Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T14CM02604
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/06/2014 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/06/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the two new split systems specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012. |
| 05/06/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plan review has been completed and the following corrections are required. Please provide a written response to comments with plan re-submittal. 1) Errata: Electrical code in code review is listed as 2012 NEC, revise to 2011 NEC 2) Errata: PP e1.0 keyed notes are not labeled. 3) PP e1.1 ComCheck lighting certificate did not print clearly, modify and ensure that font size meets minimum 3/32" requirement for City scanning purposes. 4) PP e3.0 Panel "N" ckt 20 identified as feeding lighting in conference room 101, verify as it is not indicated in lighting plans. If there are questions regarding this review contact: LeeRay 520-837-4906 LeeRay.Hanly@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/06/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/06/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET a2.0; DEMO KEYNOTES: NOTE 18 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 2. SHEETS a3.0, a3.1, AND a4.0: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE ROOM ID VERBIAGE AND DETAIL CUTS. 3. SHEET a3.1; FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES: NOTES 5, 8, AND 13 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 4. SHEET a4.0; KEY NOTES: NOTES 3, 5, AND 12 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 5. GENERAL: PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE CONNECTION OF THE TOP OF THE PARTITIONS TO THE STRUCTURE ABOVE (ALL WALLS INDICATED FULL HEIGHT). 6. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 05/06/2014 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/06/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The maximum flow rates for plumbing fixtures shall be consistent with ARS Title 45, Chapter 1, Article 12. See text at: (http://www.azleg.state.az.us/ArizonaRevisedStatutes.asp). 2. Provide automatic faucets for the lavatories, dispensing a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Clarify the water fixture unit calculations - waterless urinals normally do not require a water supply. 4. Provide the basis for the water distribution calculations (e.g. available water pressure, static lift, minimum residual water pressure, developed pipe length, etc). Revise the water pipe sizing shown on sheet P1.1 to correspond to the pipe sizing chart. Reference: Sections 604.1 and 604.3, IPC 2012. |
| 05/06/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 05/07/2014 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/09/2014 | KROBLES1 | WWM | REVIEW | Needs Review |