Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - - 1ST
Permit Number - T14CM01932
Review Name: REVISION - - 1ST
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/07/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN: THE NEW CMU WALL (NOTE 7) MUST INDICATE WALL REINFORCING, NEW LINTEL OVER THE OPENING, NEW ROOF, AND NEW FOOTINGS AS REQUIRED. PROVIDE DESIGN AS NEEDED. 2. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN: IS THIS NEW RESTROOM ACCESSIBLE? VERIFY. 3. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 05/07/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 701 E. 36th Street T14CM01932 Building Plan (Revision) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 7, 2014 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. As a building expansion is proposed a revised development package is required. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the revised approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 05/08/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Correct the calculations in the fixture connecetion schedule and the pressure loss calculations. 2. Verify that the water demand can be accommodated by the existing water meter. 3. Show that the minimum plumbing ffixtures have been provided (e.g. drinking fountain). 4. Verify with the manufacturer that the specified water heaters can successfully supply hot water to the lavatories. 5. Provide power for the second water heater. |
| 05/08/2014 | CPIERCE1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 05/08/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Show that the building addition complies to the requirements of the 2012 IECC |
| 05/08/2014 | CPIERCE1 | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/08/2014 | CPIERCE1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 05/08/2014 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |