Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T14CM01498
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/20/2014 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/25/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 03/25/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 03/25/2014 | LHANLY1 | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 03/25/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/26/2014 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T14CM01498 9160 S. Houghton Road Multi-Tenant Shell Building TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 27, 2014 DUE DATE: April 4, 2014 COMMENTS: 01. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the current version of the development package site plan ands as it pertains to the zoning review purview of the building plans. While the building footprint is in substantial compliance with DP Site plan foot print zoning cannot approve the building plans at this time. 02. Zoning did verify that the canopy overhang is not depicted, labeled or dimensioned on the DP site plan sheet. The building plans clearly depict a painted steel canopy along the front of the shell building. Be aware that zoning reviews the building plans for compliance with the approved DP site plan to ensure that the footprint in the building plans package matches the footprint drawn on the DP site plan. 03. Ensure that the canopy is drawn, labeled and dimensioned on the DP site plan. 04. Zoning will re-review the building plans on the next submittal and approve them assuming the DP is approved. The footprint of the building in the building plans package must match the foot print in the DP site plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Building plans |
| 03/26/2014 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/27/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET A1; GENERAL NOTES: IN NOTE 1, PROVIDE THE CODE EDITIONS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF THESE DRAWINGS. 2. SHEET A1; CODE REVIEW: PROVIDE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE CANPOY FOR INCLUSION IN THE VALUATION OF THIS PROJECT. THERE WILL BE NO ADDITIONAL OCCUPANT LOAD OR IMPACT FEE FOR THIS SQUARE FOOTAGE. 3. SHEET A1; SHELL BUILDING CODE REVIEW: THE OCCUPANCY GROUP REFERENCES THE IBC SECTION 309.1 (MERCANTILE GROUP M), THEN THE REVIEW LISTS A2 (ASSEMBLY). CLARIFY. 4. SHEET A1; SHELL BUILDING CODE REVIEW: REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE IBC SECTION 903.1.1 FOR AN APPROVED FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM. THIS SECTION REFERENCES ALTERNATIVE PROTECTION. IS THIS SECTION REFERENCE CORRECT? 5. SHEET A1; FLATWORK KEYNOTES: NOTES 3, 17, AND 19 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 6. SHEET A-2; FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTES 8, 9, 10, 11, AND 13 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 7. SHEET A-3 (BUILDING SECTION 5); SHEET A-4 (DETAIL 7): BUILDING SECTION 5 INDICATES A FULL HEIGHT DETAIL, WHILE DETAIL 7 ONLY SHOWS A LIMITED HEIGHT DETAIL. REVISE. 8. SHEET A-3; SOUTH ELEVATION: BETWEEN GRIDS 4 AND 5, A PARAPET DETAIL REFERENCES X/A-4. COMPLETE THE REFERENCE. 9. SHEET A-3; SOUTH ELEVATION: BETWEEN GRIDS 2 AND 3, A DETAIL REFERENCES 4/A4. REVISE THE REFERENCE. 10. SHEET A-3; WEST ELEVATION: IN TWO LOCATIONS, A TOP OF PIER DETAIL REFERENCES 7/A4. REVISE THE REFERENCE. 11. SHEET A-3; EAST ELEVATION: BETWEEN GRIDS A AND B, A TOP OF PIER DETAIL REFERENCES 7/A4. REVISE THE REFERENCE. 12. SHEET A-3; ELEVATION KEYNOTES: NOTES 2, 6, 14, AND 17 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE ELEVATIONS. VERIFY. 13. SHEET A-3; NORTH ELEVATION: SIX DOORS ON THIS ELEVATION REFERENCE KEY NOTE 15. REVISE THAT REFERENCE. 14. SHEET A-3; ELEVATION KEY NOTES: COMPLETE NOTE 6. 15. SHEET A-4; WALL SECTION 8 (KEYNOTE 4): NOTE 4 AT THE CANOPY INDICATES A WOOD BEAM. REVISE. 16. SHEET A-4; WALL SECTION 8 (SECTION KEYNOTES): NOTES 17, 18, AND 20 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE SECTION. VERIFY. 17. SHEET A-4; WALL SECTION 8: AT THE BASE OF THE WALL, A DETAIL REFERENCES 9/A4. REVISE THE REFERENCE. 18. SHEET A-5; ROOF PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTES 6, 7, AND 9 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 19. SHEET A-5; ROOF PLAN: ON THE STEEL CANOPY WEST OF GRID 1, A KEYNOTE 8 REFERENCES A ROOF SYSTEM ON WOOD DECK. REVISE THE DECK NOTE. 20. SHEETS S-1.0 THROUGH S-5.0: THESE SHEETS ALL INDICATE "PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION". THESE SHEETS WERE NOT REVIEWED AT THIS TIME. 21. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/02/2014 | SHANAE POWELL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |