Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T14CM01461
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/02/2014 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/02/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET A0; BUILDING CODES (GENERAL BUILDING HEIGHTS AND AREAS): IN DETERMINING THE ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA, THESE PLANS CONSIDERED THE GROUP B OCCUPANCY. PER THE IBC SECTION 508.3.1, CONSIDERATION FOR ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREAS MUST BE BASED ON THE MOST RESTRICTIVE USE (IN THIS CASE, THE A-2). REVISE THE ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA NARRATIVE. 2. SHEET A0; BUILDING CODES (GENERAL BUILDING HEIGHTS AND AREAS): REFERENCE IS MADE (ON THIRD LINE) TO TABLE 406.3.5. REVISE THIS REFERENCE TO THE 2012 IBC. 3. SHEET A0; BUILDING CODES (OCCUPANCY GROUPS AND LOADS): THE OCCUPANCY GROUP AND OCCUPANT LOAD FOR EACH SPACE WILL BE DETERMINED AT THE TIME THE FIRST TENANT APPLIES FOR A PERMIT (NO ACTION REQUIRED ON THESE DRAWINGS). 4. SHEET A0; SHEET INDEX: SHEET AD1 IS LISTED IN THE INDEX, BUT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS SET. VERIFY. 5. SHEETS A2 AND A3; KEYNOTES: PROVIDE A NOTE THAT ALL KEYNOTES MAY NOT BE LOCATED ON EACH PLAN. 6. SHEETS A2 AND A3; KEYNOTES: NOTES 10 AND 12 WERE NOT LOCATED ON EITHER PLAN. VERIFY. 7. SHEET A3; ROOF PLAN: BETWEEN GRIDS 3 AND 4, AND NORTH OF GRID B, A KEYNOTE 17 IS INDICATED. THERE IS NO KEYNOTE 17 LISTED. CLARIFY. 8. SHEET A3 (SCUPPER DIAGRAM); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 1): A REFERENCE TO THE 2012 IBC SECTION 1611.1 INDICATES THE ROOF IS DESIGNED FOR ADDITIONAL LOAD DUE TO BLOCKED SCUPPERS. VERIFY THE CALCULATIONS HAVE CONSIDERED THAT LOAD. 9. SHEET A4: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE ELEVATION HEIGHT REFERENCES. 10. SHEET A4; KEYNOTES: NOTE 9 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE ELEVATIONS. VERIFY. 11. SHEET A5; NORTH-SOUTH BUILDING SECTION: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE ELEVATION HEIGHT DESCRIPTIONS. 12. SHEET A6; WALL DETAILS W06 AND W07: AT THE TOP OF THE WALL BRACING, PROVIDE THE SIZE, SPACING, AND CONNECTION TO THE TOP OF THE WALL AND TO THE ROOF STRUCTURE ABOVE. INCLUDE CONNECTION SIZE AND QUANTITY. 13. SHEET S000; GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES (FOUNDATIONS): THE FIRST NOTE INDICATES A SOIL REPORT WAS USED FOR THE FOUNDATION DESIGN. PROVIDE A REPORT FOR REVIEW. 14. SHEET S200 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 78): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE COLUMN FOOTINGS CF4 (ON GRID C AT GRIDS 3 AND 4) AS 5'-0" SQUARE X 24" DEEP WITH 5-#5 EACH WAY TOP AND BOTTOM, WHILE THE DRAWINGS INDICATE CF1 (5'-0" SQUARE X 12" DEEP WITH 5-#5 EACH WAY BOTTOM). CLARIFY. 15. SHEET S210 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); SECTION 3/S400: IN THE SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST CORNERS OF THE PLAN, A DETAIL 3/S400 IS CUT. THIS DETAIL INDICATES A STEEL COLUMN. THERE ARE NO STEEL COLUMNS AT THESE LOCATIONS. CLARIFY. 16. SHEET S210; ROOF FRAMING PLAN NOTES: NOTES 2 AND 4 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 17. GENERAL: DARKEN THE LINE WEIGHT ON ALL SHEETS AS REQUIRED. 18. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 04/04/2014 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T14CM01461 6501 E Grant Road Shell Building Plans TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 4, 2014 DUE DATE: April 29, 2014 COMMENTS: 01. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the un-approved version of the development package DP13-0236 for compliance as it relates to the zoning review purview. 02. The development package has not been approved as of the of this building plan review. Additional comments made on the review of the development package may alter the site and affect the building plans. Until an approved development package zoning will not be able to approve the building plans. 03. While the building plans are within the parameters of the building footprint and height listed on the un-approved DP, zoning cannot approve the building plans at this time. 04. Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal for compliance with the DP. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. |
| 04/09/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Each scupper provides drainage for a discrete area based on the layout of the crickets. Verify the area for each roof section, including the area of the top of each parapet. Provide the calculations showing how the width of each scupper was determined. Note that details 3/A6 and 4/A6 give different dimensions for the scuppers. Reference: Sections 1106.1, 1106.4, and 1108.3, IPC 2012. 2. The gravity grease interceptor will apparently be serving multiple restaurants. Show how responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the gravity grease interceptor will be assured. |
| 04/09/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/10/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/21/2014 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 04/21/2014, The building site plan shall be approved after the development package (DP13-0236) is approved. |
| 04/30/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/30/2014 | AROMERO4 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/30/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |