Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T14CM01441
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/16/2014 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Original Comment 2: Please provide a large scale detail of the mechanical lift showing entrance and exit doors and accessible clearances required. I'm not sure that you have the required clearances for the lift doors. a. Knowing how much mechanical lifts cost these days, I've provided a sketch to include a ramp in lieu of the mechanical lift. See what you think. Original Comment 6: Please provide plans and elevations showing the handrails on both sides if the steps and all the accessible requirements such as dimensioning, extensions, elevations and etc as required by ICC A117.1, Section 505. Original Comment 12: The supplemental calculations seems not to be included in this resubmittal package. Please email to me at ronald.brown@tucsonaz.gov. END OF REVIEW |
| 10/16/2014 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Building plan can not be approved prior to the approval of the development plan package. Due to floodplain restrictions and FFE elevations 2 ELCERTS will be required for construction. JG |
| 10/23/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Tucson Chinese Christian Church - New Sanctuary Building T14CM01441 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 23, 2014 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve until the development package has been approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 10/30/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Comment not resolved; the AC units are specified as having an input of 120 MBH on sheet MP-1 but sheet P-1 calls out an input of 132 CFH for each unit. Show how the gas pipe sizes were determined (e.g. Formula 4-1, IFGC 2012 or Table 402.4 (2), IFGC 2012). [Initial comment: Verify the total connected gas loads for AC unit 1 through 4; each unit is shown as having an input of 132 MBH on sheet MP-1 but sheet P-1 shows AC-4 with an input of 150 CFH and two other units with a total input of 400 CFH. Coordinate the drawings and indicate all of the required pipe sizes. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 2. Comment not addressed. Note that on sheet P-1, a note says, "1/2"CW DN IN WALL TO P9" but points to fixture P7. [Initial comment: Clarify the drain piping for fixture P7; on sheet P2, two fixture drains are shown (only one has a trap) whereas on sheet P1, there is no connection to the building drain shown. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 3. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: The water heater schedule on sheet MP1 calls out three 20-gallon electric water heaters but only two water heaters are shown on sheet P1 (only one is labeled). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 4. The HW piping configuration in the remaining water heater detail appears to show the HWR being connected to the HW supply which is incorrect. Reference: Section 607.2.2, IPC 2012. [Initial comment: Clarify the design intent for the two different water heater details (one gas-fired, one electric) shown on sheet P2. Their location is not indicated on sheet P1. The HW piping configuration is unclear on detail 1/P2 and the size of the HWR piping is questionable on detail 2/P2. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 5. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Provide material standards for all plumbing fixtures being provided by others. Reference: Sections 303.4 and 402, IPC 2012.] 6. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Provide tempered water for the restroom lavatories using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. The specified mixing valve conforms to ASSE 1070 and ASSE 1016 but there are mixing valves (i.e. possible substitutions) that conform only to ASSE 1016. Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012.] 7. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: If the shower does not have a pre-fabricated receptor, provide details to show that the construction of the receptor complies with the requirements of Section 417.5.2, IPC 2012.] 8. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Provide shower control valves that comply with the requirements of Sections 424.3 and 424.5, IPC 2012.] 9. Use the water fixture units from Table 6-5 or Table A-2, UPC 2006, including Assembly fixture units where applicable. Revise the sizes of the water distribution pipes to correspond to the water pressure calculations. Provide a cut-sheet of an approved reduced pressure backflow assembly that has a pressure drop of only 8.5 PSI. Clarify the size of the proposed water meter: it is 1-1/2" on sheet MP1 but the site plan shows a 1" meter being installed. [Initial comment: Section 604.1, IPC 2012 allows water distribution systems to be designed using accepted engineering methods. Sizing pipes for water distribution systems using Section 610, UPC 2006 is an accepted engineering method only if it is used as presented in Sections 610.1 through 610.13, or Appendix A, UPC 2006. Use the water fixture units from Table 6-5 or Table A-2, UPC 2006, including Assembly fixture units where applicable. Provide the water pressure calculations.] 10. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Provide for sterilization and testing of the domestic water system per Section 610, IPC 2012.] 11. Note: an approved development plan is not to be used for construction of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to the building, building sewer, site lighting, or electrical service to the building). The construction of the on-site utilities may be included with the permit for constructing the building or as a separate permit. The "Reference Only" site plan is unacceptable because a reference drawing is not for construction purposes. |
| 10/30/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Comment not resolved. The architectural drawings still show multiple R-values for the roof that are different from the R-value used on the Envelope Compliance Certificate. Provide NFRC fenestration product ratings for the door and window U-factors and solar heat gain coefficients (SHGC) on COMcheck or use the appropriate default values from Tables C303.1.3 (1) C303.1.3 (2) and, C303.1.3 (3), IECC 2012. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IEC 2012 [Initial comment: Coordinate the energy code analysis for the building envelope and the building components shown on the drawing. The roof cavity insulation is noted on sheets A6.0, A6.1, A6.2, and A7 as having an R-value of R-30 or R-38 but the Envelope Compliance Certificate calls out R-36 cavity insulation. The glazing and doors are noted as having a U-value of 0.40 on A6.0 but on the Envelope Compliance Certificate shows no doors and the glazing has a U-value of 0.50. Reference: Section C303.1, IECC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.] 2. Show that the proposed HVAC system meets the control requirements of Section C403.2.4: set-point overlap restriction, automatic set-back and shut-down controls, automatic start capabilities, and shut-off damper controls. Reference: Section C303.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. [Initial comment: Show that the proposed HVAC system meets the requirements of Sections C403.2, C403.3 and, C406.2, IECC 2012. Reference: Section C303.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.] 3. Coordinate the ventilation calculations with the mechanical design shown on the drawings. Clarify the maximum outside air setting for units AC1, AC2 and, AC3 to 860 CFM; is that the maximum outside air for each unit? [Initial comment: The City of Tucson did not adopt ASHRAE Standard 62.1 for ventilation calculations and the 2012 IMC only references the ASHRAE Standard for the purpose of calculating the system ventilation efficiency (Ev). Provide calculations to show that the ventilation system is sized in accordance with Section 403.3, IMC 2012; for HVAC systems serving multiple zones (e.g. AC1-2), see Section 403.3.2.3, IMC 2012.] 4. Comment not addressed. Include the sequence of operation for the exhaust fans serving the showers; the fans do not appear to be included in the electrical design. [Initial comment: Provide information on the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fans to show that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted. The exhausted air from the restrooms shall be limited to no more than 10% of any subsequent supply air stream. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2012.] |
| 10/31/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plan review has been completed and the following corrections are required. Please provide a written response to comments with plan re-submittal. 1) Provide 2012 IECC lighting compliance information. Information to include light reduction controls,. Reference 2012 IECC sections C405.2.1.2, C405.2.2, C405.2.2.1, C405.2.2.2 If there are questions regarding this review contact: LeeRay 520-837-4906 LeeRay.Hanly@tucsonaz.gov |