Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T14CM01316
Parcel: 127035470

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T14CM01316
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/17/2014 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change GENERAL
1. As per the 2012 IBC, Section 3411.7, paraphrased it states that no more than 20% of the alteration budget is to be attributed towards accessible requirements. Please provide an itemized summary of accessible upgrades and the percentage of the costs to the overall evlauation.
2. Verify the heights of all lettering of all sheets for compliance with the City of Tucson stsamdatrds of 3/32" minimum actual height (not CAD font select height), for both upper and lower case. Revise any plumbing and electrical sheets that do not meet this standard and resubmit.
SHEET T1.0
3. CODE REVIEW CHECK LIST
a. The adopted accessible code is as per the 2012 IBC, Chapter 11, Section 1101.2, ICC A117.1, Referenced Standards to the 2009 Edition. If a 2010 ADASAD review is dersired it may be provided upon approval of an appeal to the building official. The form is available on our web site and requires a fee of $132.00.
SHEET A1.0
4. Drinking Fountains required and provided are 3 not 2. Please reconcile.
5. Please provide a code analysis summarizing all the fire rated partitions required for a facility of this size, travel distance, occupancy load and with no sprinklers provided. Please indicate all fire rated partitions on the fire exiting plans. Pay particular attention to fire rated exit corridor requirements.
6. Please provide a code analysis that allows for open egress stairways in a non-sprinklered building.
SHEET A2.0
7. At the existing door to the most Northerly open stair well:
a. Note 16 does not relate to an exit door.
b. The strike jamb clearance is non-compliant. Reference ICC A117.1, Section 404.2.3.2.
8. Note 13 to the exterior roof stairs is not relative. Please reconcile.
9. The 5'-0" diameter accessible turning clearance circle located at the top of the accessible parking aisle is located atop a concrete planter box and does not work. Please reconcile.
SHEET A5.0
10. Provide a roof top mechanical floor plan.
SHEET A7.0
11. Delete all references to ADA unless an appeal to the building official is imminent for a 2010 ADASAD review.
12. Accessible signage mounted on the door is not compliant. Reference ICC A117.1, Section 703.
SHEET A9.0
13. Reference comment 11.
SHEET A12.0
14. Check all code copied details shown here to be compliant with 2009 ICC A117.1 unles an appeal is imminent.
SHEET S1.1
15. Provide a completed 2 part certification form for all special inspectors required as listed.
END OF REVIEW
03/19/2014 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied 1. Please provide a code analysis summarizing all the fire rated partitions required for a facility of this size, travel distance, occupancy load and with no sprinklers provided. Please indicate all fire rated partitions on the fire exiting plans. Pay particular attention to fire rated exit corridor requirements.
2. Please provide a code analysis that allows for open egress stairways in a non-sprinklered building.
3. Per Section 907.2.2 of the 2012 International Fire Code (and 2012 IBC), a manual fire alarm system is required when there is an occupant load of 100 or more above or below the lowest level of exit discharge. Please indicate on plans this will included as a deferred submittal.
03/20/2014 LEERAY HANLY ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
03/25/2014 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
03/25/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Coordinate the plumbing floor plans with the waste and vent schematic. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
2. Include all of the fixtures (e.g. S-1) when determining the water demand. Reference: Section 604.3, IPC 2012.
3. Revise the pipe sizing chart in the water calculations. The GPM values for each pipe size appear to be based on a pressure drop of 7.5 PSI per 100 feet, not 2 PSI per 100 feet as stated.
4. Verify that the pipe sizes called out for the water closet flush valves will not result in water velocities greater than that recommended by the pipe manufacturer (e.g. limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for copper, PEX, or CPVC piping). At a minimum design flow rate of 25 GPM for a siphonic, flush-valve water closet, a 1" Type L copper pipe has a flow velocity of 9.7 FPS. Reference: Table 604.3, IPC 2012.
5. Verify that all of the vents rise vertically to at least 6" above the flood rims of the fixtures they protect prior to running horizontally. Reference: Section 905.4, IPC 2012.
03/25/2014 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. The "Additional Efficiency Package Requirements" noted in COMcheck (C406, IECC 2012) is not applicable to tenant improvements, only to new construction. Reference: Section C401.2.1, IECC 2012.
2. Show that each split-system heat pump has a thermostatic control that provides for automatic start-up control. Reference: Section C403.2.4, IECC 2012.
3. According to the mechanical compliance certificate, the mechanical systems will be required to "meet the commissioning and completion requirements in Section C408.2." Provide a copy of the commissioning plan with the next submittal. Reference: Section C408.2.1, IECC 2012.
4. Provide structural details to show how the fan coil units are to be connected to the building structure. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2012.
5. Verify that the space between the corridors and the floor/ceiling assembly above can be used as a return air plenum. Reference: Section 601.2.1, IMC 2012.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/28/2014 SHANAE POWELL OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
03/28/2014 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed