Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T14CM01144
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/03/2014 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/11/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET G-01; SHEET INDEX: THE INDEX INCLUDES A SHEET A-5.0. IT IS NOT IN THE SET. CLARIFY. 2. SHEET D-1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE GENERAL NOTES. 3. SHEET A-2.0: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE GENERAL FLOOR PLAN NOTES. 4. SHEET A-2.1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE DETAIL NOTES. 5. SHEET A-2.2: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE VCT SCHEDULE AND THE PAINT SCHEDULE. 6. SHEET A-3.1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE CEILING NOTES. 7. SHEET A-4.0; SECTION 5 (A-A): A NOTE AT THE TOP OF THE WALL REFERENCES THE WALL AS 'EXISTING EXTERIOR LIGHT GAGE STUD WALL'. IS THIS A CMU WALL? VERIFY. 8. SHEET A-4.0; DETAIL 7: CALL OUT THE REINFORCING IN THE DETAIL. 9. SHEET A-4.0; DETAIL 9: AN ENLARGED DETAIL REFERENCE CALLS OUT 2/A4.0. IS THIS CORRECT? VERIFY. 10. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 03/18/2014 | KEN VAN KARSEN | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T14CM01144 1. Provide a 2012 IECC (interior) lighting calculation: use ComCheck report, or Table C405.5.2(1) building area or (2) space-by-space for budget determination. Ken Van Karsen Elect Plan Review PDSD, City of Tucson 520-837-4912 |
| 03/24/2014 | LHANLY1 | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 03/24/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PP M-2.0 The City of Tucson requires a minimum font size for 3/32" for upper and lower case letters. Revise specifications and general notes. PP M-1.0 Keynote 3 references a 3/4" condensate line to be connected to lavatory tailpiece. Indicated line is 1". Clarify if connections from the two separate condensate lines are to connect, or run separately to separate lavatories. (or maybe just dump them into mop sink. Bottom fed water heater requires vacuum relief valve per IPC 504.2. Drain isometric on pp P1.0 appears to show a sanitary "tee" fitting at connection of mopsink drain to 2" drain from drinking fountain. This fitting needs to be a directional fitting. |
| 03/24/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PP M-2.0 The City of Tucson requires a minimum font size for 3/32" for upper and lower case letters. Revise specifications and general notes. PP M-1.0 Keynote 3 references a 3/4" condensate line to be connected to lavatory tailpiece. Indicated line is 1". Clarify if connections from the two separate condensate lines are to connect, or run separately to separate lavatories. (or maybe just dump them into mop sink. Bottom fed water heater requires vacuum relief valve per IPC 504.2. |