Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T14CM01099
Parcel: 11451141A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T14CM01099
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/27/2014 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
03/10/2014 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. SHEET C1.0; DETAIL 3: REVISE THE ELEVATION OF THE BOTTOM OF THE SIGN TO 7'-0" A.F.G.
2. SHEET C1.0; SITE PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTES 9 AND 12 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
3. SHEET D1.0; DEMOLITION PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTES 3, 5, AND 7 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
4. SHEET A0.0; EXIT REQUIREMENTS: THE 'MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE' REFERENCES TABLE 1016.1. REVISE TO THE 2012 IBC.
5. SHEET A0.0; EXIT REQUIREMENTS: THE 'MAXIMUM DEAD END CORRIDOR LENGTH' REFERENCES SECTION 1017.3. REVISE TO THE 2012 IBC.
6. SHEET A0.0; EXIT REQUIREMENTS: THE 'EGRESS WIDTH' REFERENCES TABLE 1005.1. REVISE TO THE 2012 IBC.
7. SHEET A0.0; REQUIRED NUMBER OF EXITS: THE 'REQUIRED NUMBER OF EXITS' REFERENCES SECTION 1019.1. REVISE TO THE 2012 IBC.
8. SHEET A0.0; LIFE SAFETY PLAN: PER THE IBC SECTION 1014.2(4), EXIT EGRESS SHALL NOT PASS THROUGH KITCHENS OR STORAGE ROOMS. THE EXIT INDICATED IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER CAN NOT BE USED AS AN EXIT. REVISE THE OCCUPANT DISCHARGE FOR EACH EXIT ON THE PLAN.
9. SHEET A0.0; LIFE SAFETY PLAN: PER THE IBC SECTION 1015.2.1(2), THE SEPARATION DISTANCE BETWEEN EXIT DOORS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 1/3 THE DIAGONAL LENGTH OF THE AREA SERVED. VERIFY ON THE DRAWING THAT THIS REQUIREMENT IS MET.
10. SHEET A2.0; WALL SCHEDULE: FOR INTERIOR PARTITIONS THAT DO NOT EXTEND TO THE ROOF DECK, PROVIDE A DETAIL ON THE DRAWINGS TO ADEQUATELY BRACE THE WALL PER THE IBC SECTION 1607.14 REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE BRACING SIZE AND SPACING, INCLUDING CONNECTOR SIZE AND QUANTITY TO THE STRUCTURE ABOVE AND TO THE TOP OF THE PARTITION.
11. SHEET A2.0; FLOOR PLAN: IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NEW BANQUET ROOM, A DETAIL 6/A8.0 IS CUT. SHOULD THIS BE DETAIL 7/A8.0 SINCE THERE IS A SIDEWALK? VERIFY.
12. SHEET A2.0; FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTES 4, 6, 9, AND 12 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
13. SHEET A4.0; REFLECTED CEILING PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTES 24 AND 26 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
14. SHEET A5.0; ROOF PLAN KEYNOTES: AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EXISTING BUILDING, KEYNOTE 12 IS INDICATED. IS THIS CORRECT AT THIS LOCATION? VERIFY.
15. SHEET A5.0; ROOF PLAN KEYNOTES: AT THE NORTH AND SOUTH WALLS OF THE NEW ADDITION, KEYNOTE 14 IS INDICATED. ARE THESE CORRECT AT THOSE LOCATIONS? VERIFY.
16. SHEET A6.0; ELEVATION KEYNOTES: NOTES 8, 13, AND 18 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
17. SHEET A7.0; SECTION KEYNOTES: NOTES 1 AND 9 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
18. SHEET A7.0; BUILDING SECTION 4: IN THE PREP/STORAGE AREA AND MEN'S RESTROOM, NOTE 19 IS INDICATED. REVISE.
19. SHEET A7.0; BUILDING SECTION 4: IN THE PREP/STORAGE AREA, NOTE 20 IS INDICATED. REVISE.
20. SHEET A8.0; SECTION 3; DETAIL 5; ELEVATION 4: SECTION 3 AND ELEVATION 4 INDICATE A 4" WIDE, 18 GAUGE ALUMINUM TIE STRAP, WHILE DETAIL 5 INDICATES A 4" X 20 GAUGE STRAP. CLARIFY.
21. SHEET A9.0; ELEVATION KEYNOTES: NOTE 13 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE ELEVATIONS. VERIFY.
22. SHEET S0.0; GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES (CONCRETE): ADD TO THE NOTES THAT THE CONCRETE HAS BEEN DESIGNED FOR 2500 PSI COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH.
23. SHEET S1.0; PLANS: PROVIDE A NORTH ARROW ON THE PLANS.
24. SHEET S1.0; FOUNDATION PLAN: INDICATE ON THE EAST WALL OF THE FOUNDATION PLAN WHERE THE FOOTING SIZE CHANGES FROM A 16" WIDTH (DETAIL 101) TO A 30" WIDTH (DETAIL 102).
25. SHEET S1.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN AND ROOF FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S2.0 (DETAIL 202): THE DETAIL (NOTE 1) INDICATES 2X4 WALL STUDS AT 16" OC, WHILE THE PLANS (KEYNOTE 2) INDICATE 2X6 WALL STUDS AT 16" OC. CLARIFY.
26. SHEET S2.0 (DETAIL 102); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGES 7 AND 9): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A 3'-6" WIDE FOOTING, WHILE THE DETAIL INDICATES A 30" WIDE FOOTING. CLARIFY.
27. SHEET S2.0; DETAILS 101 AND 102: NOTES 7 AND 8 ARE INTERCHANGED ON THE DETAIL. REVISE.
28. SHEET S2.0; DETAIL 201: NOTE 3 REFERENCES DETAIL 104 FOR A BLOCKING PANEL. WHERE IS THIS DETAIL?
29. SHEET S2.0; DETAIL 201: NOTE 5 IS NOT INDICATED ON THE DETAIL. PROVIDE.
30. SHEET S2.0; DETAIL 202: NOTE 7 IS NOT INDICATED ON THE DETAIL. PROVIDE.
31. GENERAL; ALL STRUCTURAL SHEETS: DARKEN ALL LETTERING.
32. SHEET C1: REFERENCE IN A NOTE IS MADE TO THE NEW JERSEY CODE FOR ACCESSIBILITY. REVISE THAT REFERENCE TO THE 2012 IBC AND THE 2012 IEBC.
33. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
03/18/2014 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Reqs Change Provide the size of the existing water meter and verify the location of the meter. The location shown on the site plan appears to indicate that the water meter is downstream of the backflow preventer.
03/18/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. The equipment schedule on sheet P3.1 calls out K-19 as an iced tea brewer with a double check valve for backflow protection. K-19 is actually a soda dispenser; revise the equipment schedule and verify the backflow protection device to be used. Reference: Sections 608.1 and 608.3, IPC 2012.
2. Clarify note #3 for the equipment schedule on sheet P3.1. The note refers to a reduced pressure zone backflow assembly (RPZ) as a double check valve assembly (DCV) and vice versa. Reference: Section 608.1, IPC 2012.
3. According to the kitchen equipment schedule on sheet A11.0, appliance B-2, a wine cooler, requires an indirect waste connection. Show how the indirect waste requirement is to be accommodated.
4. Correct general note # 6 on sheet P1.1 to comply with Section 802.2, IPC 2012.
5. Revise fixture drain from the hand sink located between kitchen equipment numbers K-10 and K-18 on the waste and vent isometric to connect to the fixture drain of the existing floor sink as shown on the plumbing floor plan, P1.1. Reference: Section 910.1, IPC 2012.
6. Hand sinks in the kitchen are allowed to connect to the sanitary waste system instead of the grease waste system only if each sink has a sign posted above it stating, "HANDWASH SINK ONLY! NO FOOD PREPARATION OR DISHWASHING ALLOWED." Reference: Section 1003.3, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
7. Provide roof drainage and hydraulic scupper size calculations based on the 100-year hourly rainfall rate for Tucson, 3" per hour. Provide dimensions for the roof scuppers and overflow scuppers. Reference: Sections 1106.1, 1106.4, and 1108.3, IPC 2012.
8. Correct the equipment tags on the gas schematic (sheet P4.1) to agree with the equipment layouts on sheets P1.1 and P2.1. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
9. Clarify the developed pipe lengths used to determine the size of the gas piping to each gas-fired appliance. Reference: Section 402.3, IFGC 2012.
10. Specify the insulation required for the recirculating hot water piping. Reference: Section C404.5, IECC 2012.
11. Provide balancing data for the two hot water recirculation circuits (i.e. how many GPM per recirculating circuit). Reference: Section C404.6, IECC 2012 and Sectio607.2, IPC 2012.
12. A lined water heater with a nominal water containing capacity greater than 120 gallons is considered a boiler and shall be installed in compliance with Section R20-5-404. (Standards for Boilers, Lined Hot Water Heaters and Pressure Vessels) of the Arizona Administrative Code.
03/18/2014 LEERAY HANLY ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
03/24/2014 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the addition to the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include the U-factors and SHGF values of the fenestration components (doors and windows). Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.5, C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.
2. As noted in the COMcheck Mechanical Compliance Certificate, full compliance with Section 406, IECC 2012 requires the selection of an additional efficiency package. The plans however do not indicate that such a selection has been made. Reference: Section C401.2, IECC 2012.
3. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012.
4. According to the mechanical compliance certificate, the mechanical system will be required to "meet the commissioning and completion requirements in Section C408.2." If so, provide a copy of the commissioning plan with the next submittal. Reference: Section C408.2.1, IECC 2012.
5. Provide structural calculations to verify that the new roof is capable of supporting the point load of the roof top unit. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2012
6. The City of Tucson did not adopt ASHRAE Standard 62.1 for ventilation calculations and the 2012 IMC only references the ASHRAE Standard for the purpose of calculating the system ventilation efficiency (Ev). Provide calculations to show that the ventilation system is sized in accordance with Section 403.3, IMC 2012; for HVAC systems serving multiple zones (e.g. AC-1), see Section 403.3.2.3, IMC 2012.
7. Revise the occupant densities for the ventilation calculations in accordance with Table 403.3, IMC 2012 (e.g. Bar-dining: 100P/1000SF, Dining: 70P/1000SF). Note that these occupant densities are lower than the exiting requirements for the rooms.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/27/2014 AROMERO4 APPROVAL SHELF Completed
03/27/2014 AROMERO4 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
03/27/2014 GERARDO BONILLA REJECT SHELF Completed