Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T14CM01014
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/06/2014 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/06/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 03/10/2014 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/10/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/11/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/11/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Non-approved site plan provided as a reference; insufficient to approve. [Initial comment: Provide site plan with location & sizing of sewers, water lines, water meters and backflow preventers. (IBC107 / IPC106.3.1) Also clarify use of 2 1/2" meter mentioned in water calculations.] 2. Non-approved site plan provided as a reference; insufficient to approve. [Initial comment: Provide finished floor elevation and invert of nearest upstream manhole. (IPC 106.3.1)] |
| 03/12/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise the Envelope Compliance Certificate to coordinate with the building shown on the drawings. Provide supporting documentation of the U-value used for the "Other Roof"; see footnote (b) in Section 3 of the Envelope Compliance Certificate. Not all of the exterior walls are wood-framed and not all of the U-values and SHGC-values on the drawing agree with the values used in the Envelope Compliance Certificate. [Initial comment: Demonstrate energy code compliance for the building envelope. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the fenestration components and the Solar Heat Gain Factors for the glazing. Reference: Sections C101.3, C101.5, and C103.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.] 2. Revise the Mechanical Compliance Certificate to coordinate the mechanical systems being used with those shown in Section 3, the Mechanical Systems List. The submitted Mechanical Systems List shows only one 92 MBH single-zone unit serving the entire building instead of the three specified units. [Initial comment: Show that the proposed HVAC systems meet the requirements of Sections C403.2, C403.3 and, if neither the efficient lighting system nor the on-site renewable energy options are selected, C406.2, IECC 2012 (e.g. provide the mechanical energy code compliance certification from COMcheck). Reference: Section C303.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.] 3. Revise the heating and cooling load calculations, using the exterior design conditions shown in Section 302.2, IECC 2012, as modified by the City of Tucson. Provide justification for cooling capacities that significantly exceed the load calculations. [Initial comment: Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012.] 4. Provide calculations to show that the proposed 4" ducts are capable of supplying the required outside air to the indoor units. [Initial comment: Show how outside air will be introduced into the inside HVAC units and provide the manufacturer's equipment data and installation instructions that support the proposed method of introducing outside air into the inside HVAC units. Reference: Sections 301 and 304.1, IMC 2012.] 5. Condensate drains are shown for MS-1 and MS-2 but not for MS-3. [Initial comment: Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drain from the MS-3 inside HVAC unit. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson.] 6. The City of Tucson has adopted the 2012 IMC for calculating ventilation requirements, not ASHRAE 62.1-2007. Provide calculations per Section 403.3, IMC 2012. [Initial comment: Revise the ventilation calculations using appropriate occupancy types (e.g. "coin-op laundry" instead of corridors and utilities; "conference room" instead of office, "hotel, multi-purpose" instead of lecture classroom, etc.). Do not truncate "fractional people" in the calculations, use equation 4-1 (Section 403.3.1.1, IMC 2012) to determine the breathing zone outdoor air flow, and follow the instructions in Sections 403.3.2.3 through 403.3.2.3.4, IMC 2012 for determining the ventilation for HVAC system MS-1. Reference: Section 403.2, IMC 2012.] 7. Section 501.3.1 (3) requires that the termination of non-hazardous environmental air exhausts be more than 3'-0" from building openings. [Initial comment: Provide information to show that the terminations of the dryer exhaust vents comply with the requirements of Section 501.3.1 (3), IMC 2012.] 8. Provide documentation showing that the installation of a dryer exhaust system serving multiple dryers complies with the requirements of Section 504.7, IMC 2012 with regard to the location and control of the required exhaust fan or install individual dryer exhaust ducts per Section 504.6, IMC 2012. [Initial comment: Provide documentation to show that the design of the combined dryer ducts complies with the requirements of Section 504.7, IMC 2012.] |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/26/2014 | SHANAE POWELL | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/26/2014 | GERARDO BONILLA | REJECT SHELF | Completed |