Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T14CM00877
Parcel: 141186120

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T14CM00877
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/03/2014 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
04/03/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Water supply piping calculations not submitted. [Initial comment: Provide calculations showing how the water supply piping has been sized. Reference: Sections 604.1 and 604.3, IPC 2012.]
04/03/2014 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Detail 7/P3.0 revised to remove the water meter and backflow preventer from the building but plumbing plan 1/P1.0 still shows the water meter and backflow preventer located within the building. [Initial comment: Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required to be installed in locations accessible to Tucson Water. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf]
2. Detail 7/P3.0 revised to remove the water meter and backflow preventer from the building but plumbing plan 1/P1.0 still shows the water meter and backflow preventer located within the building. [Initial comment: Water meters are installed in locations accessible to Tucson Water. See the civil drawings for the location of the 1-1/2" water meter serving this building. Fire service to the building is provided under a separate permit and is independent of the domestic water service.]
04/03/2014 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Revised Envelope Compliance Certificate not submitted. [Initial comment: Revise and complete the Envelope Compliance Certificate. Section 3, the requirements checklist shows that compliance to the 2012 IECC is "TBD: invalid assembly types"; it should state, "Envelope PASSES: Design X% better than code."]
2. Heating and cooling load calculations not submitted. [Initial comment: Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012.]
3. Sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fans not submitted. [Initial comment: Provide information on the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fans to show that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2012.]
04/04/2014 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change FROM: David Rivera
Principal Planner

PROJECT: T14CM00877
9090 S. Houghton Road
McDonalds Restaurant - Building plan review

TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 4, 2014

DUE DATE: April 25, 2014

COMMENTS:

01. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the current unapproved version of the Development package DP13-0178. While the building plans are in substantial compliance with the DP site plan the plans can be approved until the DP is approved and all commercial plans reviewers have approved the plans.

02. Zoning will review the plans on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved DP if available and approve the building plans assuming all changes related to the building plans review comments have been made.

03. The building elevations depicted in the building plan set shall be included on the development package set. These building elevations are more detailed and provide specific information on the materials and colors which should be listed on the DP.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.
04/14/2014 LAITH ALSHAMI ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 04/14/2014,

Plan shall be approved after the approval of the Development Package.
04/24/2014 LEERAY HANLY ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change The maximum color temperature for outdoor lighting is 3500K (OLC 402.1)

The Hiraf linear LED lights do not appear to meet the full cutoff requirements necessary to meet Option 2 of Table 401.1 of the OLC. Provide information showing these lights have been tested for being fully shielded (full cut-off) or adjust your allowable lumen count to meet Option 3 of Table 401.1.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/05/2014 SHANAE POWELL OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
06/05/2014 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed