Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T14CM00783
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/14/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Mayfair Manor Apartments T14CM00783 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 14, 2014 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve until a development package has been submitted and approved for the site changes 3. Provide a copy of the last approved site/development plan when submitting for development package review. 4. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 02/20/2014 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/24/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET TS-1; CODE ANALYSIS DATA: REMOVE THE 2010 EDITION OF THE ADA, AND REVISE THE ANSI TO THE 2009 EDITION. 2. SHEET TS-1; CODE ANALYSIS DATA: REVISE THE IECC TO THE 2012 EDITION. 3. SHEET DSP1.0; KEY NOTES: NOTE 5.1 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLANS. VERIFY. 4. SHEET DSP1.0; DEMOLITION SITE PLANS 1, 2, AND 3: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE KEY NOTE INDICATORS. 5. SHEET ASP1.1; NOTES: NOTE 16.1 IS NOT LEGIBLE. REVISE. 6. SHEET ASP1.1; SITE PLANS 1, 2, AND 3: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE KEY NOTE INDICATORS. 7. SHEET ASP1.2; NOTES: NOTE 4.1 INDICATES 'NEW DUMPSTER BY OTHERS', BUT REFERENCES A NEW CMU WALL. CLARIFY. 8. SHEET ASP1.3; DETAIL 4: THE DISTANCE FROM FINISH GRADE TO THE BOTTOM OF THE FOOTING IS NOT LEGIBLE. REVISE. 9. SHEET ASP1.3; DETAILS 9 AND 10: INDICATE ON THE DETAILS HOW THE NEW STEEL FENCE IS ANCHORED TO THE EXISTING MASONRY WALL. 10. SHEET S1.0; GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES (FOUNDATIONS): NOTE 1 REFERENCES A TABLE FROM THE 2006 IBC. REVISE THE REFERENCE TO THE 2012 IBC. 11. SHEET S2.0 (COLUMN SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 69): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE COLUMNS BP1 AND BP2 REQUIRE A 12" SQUARE X 1 1/4" BASE PLATE, WHILE THE COLUMN SCHEDULE INDICATES A 3/4" X 12" SQUARE PLATE. CLARIFY. 12. SHEET S2.0; FOUNDATION PLAN NOTES (10): THE SHEARWALL INDICATED IN THE NOTE SHOULD HAVE CROSS HATCHING PER THE PLAN. 13. SHEET S2.0; FOUNDATION PLAN NOTES: NOTE 12 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 14. SHEET S2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET S4.0 (DETAILS 2 AND 3): THE DETAILS INDICATE THE FOOTING EXTENDS PAST THE WALL ON BOTH SIDES, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES THE FOOTING EXTENDS PAST THE WALL AT THE INTERIOR ONLY. CLARIFY. 15. SHEET S3.0 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S5.0 (DETAIL 209): THE PLAN INDICATES THE GLUE LAM BEAM CANTILEVERING OVER THE STEEL COLUMN, WHILE THE DETAIL INDICATES THE GLB STOPPING AT THE STEEL COLUMN (PER DETAIL 209A). CLARIFY. 16. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEET 8: WHERE ARE HEADERS 1, 2, AND 3 (SHEETS 28-33) LOCATED ON THIS FRAMING KEY PLAN? PROVIDE. 17. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: THE COLUMN FOOTING DESIGNS (DC1 AND DC2) WERE NOT LOCATED IN THE CALCULATIONS. VERIFY. 18. SHEETS A1.0, A2.0, A3.0, AND A4.0: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE KEY NOTE INDICATORS. 19. SHEET A2.0 (ELEVATION 2); SHEET A15.0 (ELEVATION 2): THE ELEVATION 2/A15.0 INDICATES A DOOR AT THE LOWER LEVEL, WHILE ELEVATION 2/A2.0 INDICATES A WINDOW. CLARIFY. 20. SHEET A5.0; KEY NOTES: NOTE 5.2 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN OR ELEVATIONS. VERIFY. 21. SHEETS A6.1 AND A6.2; BUILDING/CEILING PLANS: THE SECTIONS CUT THROUGH THE BUILDING AND CEILING PLANS REFERENCE SHEET A6.2. REVISE. 22. SHEET A6.3; KEY NOTES: NOTES 7.3, 7.7, 7.9, 9.5, AND 16.1 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE SECTIONS. VERIFY. 23. SHEET A8.0; ROOF PLANS (BUILDINGS A AND F): A NOTE AT THE SOLAR HOT WATER SYSTEM INDICATES STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS TO BE PROVIDED FOR THE EXISTING ROOF UNDER THE NEW LOADING CONDITION. WERE THOSE CALCULATIONS PERFORMED? VERIFY. 24. SHEET A9.0; ELEVATION 3: A KEY NOTE 9.1 IS SHOWN ON THE ELEVATION BUT NOT LISTED IN THE KEY NOTES. VERIFY. 25. SHEET A9.0; DEMOLITION ELEVATION 4: A KEY NOTE D7.1 IS SHOWN ON THE ELEVATION, BUT LISTED IN THE KEY NOTES AS 'NOT USED'. CLARIFY. 26. SHEET A10.0; DEMOLITION ELEVATION 3: A KEY NOTE D7.1 IS SHOWN ON THE ELEVATION, BUT LISTED IN THE KEY NOTES AS 'NOT USED'. CLARIFY. 27. SHEET A11.0; DEMOLITION ELEVATIONS 4 AND 5: A KEY NOTE D7.1 IS SHOWN ON THE ELEVATION, BUT LISTED IN THE KEY NOTES AS 'NOT USED'. CLARIFY. 28. SHEETS A12.0, A13.0, AND A14.0; DEMOLITION KEY NOTES: ADD THE PREFIX 'D' TO NOTES 16.1 AND 16.2. 29. SHEET A15.0; DEMOLITION KEY NOTES: ADD THE PREFIX 'D' TO NOTES 16.1, 16.2, AND 16.3. 30. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 02/26/2014 | CPIERCE1 | WWM | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 03/05/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Obtain an activity number for each separate building to facilitate inspection coordination in the field. 2. Verify that the makeup water supply for the cooling tower is protected with an air gap conforming to the requirements of Section 608.13.1, IPC 2012 or show how the water supply is to be protected from backflow. Reference: Section 608.1, IPC 2012. 3. Correct the detail call out for the make up water schematic from 6/M3.1 to 5/M3.2. |
| 03/05/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Provide a site drawing showing the size and route of the site water supply along with the location and size of the water meter(s) and any reduced pressure backflow preventer assemblies. Show the total water demand for each water meter. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 03/06/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Obtain an activity number for each separate building to facilitate inspection coordination in the field. 2. Provide temperature and pressure relief valves for each section of the solar water heating system that can develop excessive temperatures or pressures beyond the design limitations. Reference: Section 1402.5.1, IMC 2012. 3. Correct the service description of EF-M1. 4. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for HP-1 and HP-2. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012. 5. Show that the proposed rooftop units, HP-1 and HP-2, meet the requirements of Sections C403.2.2, C403.2.3, C403.2, and C403.3 (e.g. provide the mechanical energy code compliance certification from COMcheck). Reference: Section C303.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 6. Show that the proposed water-cooled chiller meets the requirements of Section C403.2.3. Reference: Section C303.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 7. Show that the proposed natural gas-fired hot water boiler meets the thermal efficiency requirements of Table C403.2.3 (5), IECC 2012. Reference: Section C403.2.3, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. |
| 03/07/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/06/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |