Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T14CM00355
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/22/2014 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/28/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET A0.0; KEYED NOTES: NOTE 3 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 2. SHEET A2.0; KEY NOTES: NOTE 14 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 3. SHEET A3.0; MEN'S RESTROOM ELEVATION D; WOMEN'S RESTROOM ELEVATION B: ADD THE VERTICAL GRAB BAR PER THE TYPICAL MOUNTING HEIGHTS INDICATED BELOW. 4. SHEET A3.0; TYPICAL MOUNTING HEIGHTS: PROVIDE THE DISTANCE FROM THE BACK WALL OF THE TOILET TO THE VERTICAL GRAB BAR, AND THE VERTICAL GRAB BAR LENGTH (PER ICC/ANSI FIGURE 604.5.1). 5. SHEET S2.0: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE FOUNDATION NOTES. 6. SHEET S2.1 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 20): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A 1'-6" DEEP CMU LINTEL AT THE TUNNEL, BUT THE PLAN ON S2.1 AND DETAIL 201 MAKE NO REFERENCE TO THE BEAM DEPTH. VERIFY. 7. SHEET S2.1; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: THE STEEL DECK INDICATES "PER PLAN". REVISE TO 'PER GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES'. 8. SHEET S2.1 (TOWER PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: THE PLAN INDICATES A HSS6X6X1/4 TYPICAL BEAM AT ALL FOUR SIDES, WHILE THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A HSS6X6X5/16. CLARIFY. 9. SHEET S3.0 (DETAIL 113); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 15): THE WALL AND FOOTING DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND DETAIL 113 FOR THE TRASH ENCLOSURE. IS THE TRASH ENCLOSURE INDICATED ON ANY SITE PLAN? VERIFY. 10. SHEETS S3.0 AND S4.0: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE DETAIL NOTES. 11. GENERAL: NO INDICATION IS MADE ON THE ARCHITECTURAL OR STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS CONCERNING THE SLOPE OF THE EXISTING ROOF JOISTS AT THE METAL CANOPY. INDICATE THE SLOPE FOR THE JOIST MANUFACTURER SO THAT THE NEW METAL CANOPY WILL MATCH THE EXISTING (PER THE ROOF FRAMING NOTE ON SHEET S2.1). 12. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 01/29/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide information on the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fans to show that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted. The exhausted air from the restrooms shall be limited to no more than 10% of any subsequent supply air stream. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2012. |
| 01/29/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify the work associated with the two lavatories in the restrooms. Keynote # 10 on the demolition plan, A0.0, calls for them to be demolished and keynote #14 on sheet A3.0 replaces them but nothing is shown on the plumbing plan, MP1.0. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Keynote #3 on sheet MP1.0 calls out a backflow preventer for the car wash equipment. Specify the type of backflow preventer and show how it will be installed per the manufacturer's recommendations and accessible for maintenance. Reference: Sections 608.1 and 608.14, IPC 2012. 3. Show how the new section of roof is to be drained and show where the rainwater will be discharged. Reference: Section 1101.2, IPC 2012. |
| 01/29/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/05/2014 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T14CM00355 2140 N Kolb Road Building Plan Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 5, 2014 DUE DATE: February 19, 2014 COMMENTS: 01. Zoning has reviewed the building plans and while they are in substantial compliance with the unapproved development plan the building plans cannot be approved at this time. Zoning will re-review the building plans on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved development package site plan. (Zoning will approve the building plans once the building review agencies have approved the plans.) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
| 02/12/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1) Show compliance with the City of Tucson Outdoor lighting code. This site is approximately .63 acres, indicated outdoor lighting does not appear to be compliant with any of the 3 allowed methods of computing total lumens allowed on the site. (Pima County/City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting code Table 401.1) Provide verification that any lamps used for outdoor lighting do not exceed the allowed color temperature of 3500 kelvin. (OLC section 402) 2) Exhaust fans in restrooms are shown switched by a 20A rocker switch. Switch would be required to be a 24/7 timer switch to be on while building was occupied (IMC 403.2.1(3)) |