Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T14CM00036
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/10/2014 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Development Plan must be approved first. |
| 01/13/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/13/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Show the location of fixture P6. Verify if a backflow preventer will be required for the ice maker. Reference: Section 608.1, IPC 2012 and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Provide material standards for all plumbing fixtures (e.g. P4) being provided by others. Reference: Sections 303.4 and 402, IPC 2012. 3. Clarify how the temperature and pressure relief for the water heater is being accommodated. Detail 3/P2.1 shows the T&P pipe being routed parallel to the safety pan drain but the note calls for the T&P to terminate into the safety pan. The route and ultimate termination point for the safety pan drain is not shown. (Note that on sheet P1.2, the wrong detail for the water heater is referenced.) Reference: Section 504, IPC 2012. 4. Provide a floor drain for the fire pump room and ensure that the floor is pitched away from the critical equipment per Section 5.12.6, NFPA 20-2013 and Section 913.1, IFC 2012. |
| 01/13/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Show how the fire pump room will maintain a minimum temperature of 40 F on a design heating day (32 F). Reference: Section 913.3, IFC 2012. 2. Revise the energy code analysis for the building envelope, coordinating the building components used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing (e.g. roof is detailed with cavity insulation, no skylights are specified, the high albedo roof coating is not specified and, neither version of the exterior wall for the sales area is the same as the details). Note that details 8, 10, 14, and 15/A6.1 show conflicting versions of the roof insulation. Reference: Section C303.1, IECC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Complete the Mechanical Compliance Certificate by checking the appropriate line items in Section 4, the Requirements Checklist. 4. Provide structural details to show how the fan coil units are to be connected to the building structure. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2012. 5. Clarify the sequence of operation for EF-3, EF-4 and, EF-5. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2012. |
| 01/13/2014 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please install more access doors per Section 3206 of the 2012 edition of the IFC. |
| 01/14/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/16/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PPA1.1 A) THIS APPEARS TO BE AN S-1 OCCUPANCY WITH A PORTION THAT IS B. IF THIS IS AN ACTUAL F2 OCCUPANCY THEN PROVIDE THE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS LIST AND THE METHOD OF STORAGE. (IBC 311.2, IBC 307.1, IBC 406.8) B) USE THE NUMBERS FROM IBC TABLE 503 FOR YOUR ALLOWABLE AREA CALCULATIONS. IF THIS IS GOING TO BE VB CONSTRUCTION THEN START AT 9000 SQ FT x 300% INCREASE FOR SPRINKLER = 36,000 ALLOWABLE. C) BASE PLUMBING FIXTURE CALCULATIONS ON TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD NOT FOR EACH INDIVIUAL OCCUPANCY. ROUND UP FOR FRACTIONAL #'S (IBC 2902.1, IBC 2902.1.1) YOU CAN SHOW THIS AS AN S1 OCCUPANCY FOR THIS PURPOSE AS THE B OCCUPANCY IS ACCESSORY TO THE MAIN OCCUPANCY GROUP. PP A4.0 & A6.0 THIS SET OF PLANS INDICATES THAT THERE IS ANOTHER PERMIT FOR THE STEEL BUILDING. THERE WAS AN ACTIVITY STARTED (T13CM07181) BUT NO PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED. WE CANNOT MAKE ASSUMPTIONS OF VALID APPROVED PLANS WITHOUT AN ACTUAL PERMIT ISSUANCE. |
| 01/22/2014 | CPIERCE1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review | |
| 01/22/2014 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Date: January 22, 2014 From: David Rivera Principal Planner Zoning Review Project: T14CM00036 - Pucell Tire Center Development Package Address: 1515 E Ajo Way Comments 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the current version of the development package site plan. While the building plans are consistent with the current version of the developmnet package that is under review, zoning cannot approve them until the development package is approved and all commercial plan reviewers have approved the building plans. 2. Zoning will re-review hte building plans on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the revised or approved development package site plan. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/22/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |