Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: BILLBOARD - BLDG30days
Permit Number - T14BU01427
Review Name: BILLBOARD - BLDG30days
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/07/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET 2; DETAILS 2, 3, 4, 5, AND 6: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE DETAIL VERBIAGE. |
| 01/26/2015 | GLENN MOYER | ADMINISTRATIVE | ADMIN REVIEW | Denied | BRC Comments Below are comments for the authorized alteration for COT ID# 82 at 4862 East 22nd Street (T14BU01427). Sheet 1 of 2 1. In Billboard Note #3, correct the APN. 2. In title block, refer to proposed work as “Billboard Alteration Plan” (per the term in the Stipulation) or, if any existing parts are to be replaced, “Billboard Repair and Alteration Plan”. Sheet 2 of 2 1. In Scope of Work, provide step by step detail, indicating the new parts to be added in that step and the number and dimensions of each part (and, if applicable, any parts to be replaced or removed and reinstalled). 2. Add plan view detail showing the outer dimensions of the pigeon pan framework and the dimensional details on the attachment points of vertical mounting brackets and crossmember locations. 3. Inset #4 appears to be South Elevation and needs to be corrected. 4. In the Title and Scope of Work Blocks, change “Authorized Repair” to “Authorized Alteration” (or “Authorized Repair and Alteration” if any existing parts are to be replaced). 5. In Inset #5, in the two detail designations, it appears that the length of the crossmembers (14” shown) is in error and needs to be corrected; also, clarify by adding “crossmembers” to name. 6. In Inset #5, the angle iron pigeon pan framework mounting bracket attached to the catwalk ledgers are shown as 8” in length in the main depiction and as 14” in length in the subdetail; please resolve this conflict. 7. In Inset #5, Mounting Detail (West Elevation), add a separate detail related to the location the four boxes not at a catwalk ledger (it appears that these boxes relate to the locations of four pair of crossmembers installed between the ledgers and a separate detail is needed (in addition to the existing one for the three pair that are installed at the ledgers). 8. In Insets #2 & #3, the long (west) rail is depicted with the tang down, whereas in Insets #4 & #5 it is twice depicted with the tang up; please resolve this conflict; clarify if the each of the two long rails are one piece or segmented (consistent with Comment #1 above). |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/17/2015 | AROMERO4 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |