Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: T13PI00019
Parcel: Unknown

Address:
4050 E BENSON HY

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: PIA - SUBMITTAL

Plan Number - T13PI00019
Review Name: PIA - SUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/01/2014 RICHARD LEIGH PIA COORDINATOR CUSTOMER CALLED; PLANS @ AMBASSSADOR Completed
04/01/2014 RICHARD LEIGH PIA COORDINATOR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
10/07/2013 GARY WITTWER DOT LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied It appears that you intend to use 5' of ROW for your required 10' Bufferyard. You must get approval from TDOT for this. Please submit you irrigation plans for Common Areas. NOTE; irriagition lines can not cross public roadway without a recorded easement.
10/08/2013 JOSE ORTIZ DOT TRAFFIC REVIEW Denied PLANS # i-2013-016
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T13PI00019
PROJECT NAME: Cantera S Phase 73-142
PROJECT ADDRESS: Benson Hwy & Alvernon Wy
PROJECT REVIEWER: Matthew Geweke, Traffic Eng. Tech

Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the PIA Plan; therefore a revised PIA Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed and resubmit the original redline set of plans for back checking purposes.

1. See redlines on the submitted drawing Shts to address these redline comments:
- Sht 2 please use complete TDOT Signing Notes and update the Striping Notes.
- Throughout the plans, Note [27] Street Name Signs come in pairs. Their size is speed sensitive so use attached info for sign and font formatting, also add this info to Signing Notes Sht with the correct street names, address block numbers and proper compass direction to the included graph.
- Shts 5-10 please collect the signing & striping notes, make the corrections and add them to Sht 12
- STOP signs do have street name signs attached to the post assembly. Please update key note {18}
- Do not install signs so close together that one sign may block another. Hammond Dr. by lot #16 spread the signs out please.
- Please try to install signs on property lines, not on top of the HCS line or in the middle of a possible new driveway.
- Place street name signs on the approach to cross street, not after the intersection.
- Try to keep street name sign posts a bit closer to the depressed wheelchair ramp for better motorist visibility from all intersection approaches
- Please make sure you correctly label and call-out all the entire signing or striping nomenclatures, especially when RPM's are necessary.
- Please make sure that the call-out arrow is pointing to the correct icon.
- Please use TDOT Striping Standard 6-4 HAWK Ped Xing as model and modify to use with the PELICAN Ped Xing on Sht 11 (see attachment)
-If this PELICAN Ped Xing across Alvernon & Antrim is going to be installed as a School Ped Xing, please provide proper documentation; a recent Ped Study and school district student counts, the formal request letter from the requesting School Transportation Administration or Superintendent of School District, the requested schools classroom hours of instruction for each day of the week, the measured walk distance from the PELICAN Ped Xing to the requesting campus property as per the Recommended Walk Route as well as the updated/recent School District Recommended Walk Route map for that school.
-Gray scale or superfluous information (right of way lines, elevation lines, grades, survey bearings, landscaping, overhead utilities) on the signing and striping sheets are not useful and add confusion for the signing or striping contractor who is handed a faxed 8.5x11 copied piece of paper/plans.


If you wish to email me at Matthew.Geweke@tucsonaz.gov with a PDF of redlines and the corrected Shts with the revisions of these requested changes, we could expedite the Traffic Eng. acceptance/approval of these plans.

I can also be reached at 791-4259 x76665 with any questions.
Thanks…
10/25/2013 LANCE PETERSON DOT STREET MAINTENANCE REVIEW Denied We have reviewed this plan and have the following comments:

1. Sheet 1 - Note 29 - Please add the Floodplain Use Permit Number.
2. Sheet 2 - Note 21 - Paul Rosenboom's phone number is now 837-6706.
3. Sheet 3 - Detail B- This detail calls out a Hosmer Court but we were unable to locqate on the plans.
4. Sheet 3 - Detail E - Missing a portion of the detail at the inlet. Also we would like to call out grouted rip - rap for this detail.
5. Sheet 3 - Detail F - This calls out ADOT detail C-05-.30 but is not shown.
6. Sheet 3 - Detail G - This appears to be PC/COT STD Detail 207 but is not called out in the detail.
7. Sheet 4 - There are several unused leads on the plan portion. Please remove these.
8. Sheet 4 - Please provide all docket and page information for the stated easement.
9. Sheet 4 - Please verify the location of the grade break at station 14+16.9 and show the percent of grade change on each side.
10. Sheet 4 - Scupper for note 6B - The elevation shown of the plan portion is differnt than the elevation called out in the table of sheet 3. Also please call out as existing or constructed under North Phase.
11. Sheet 5 - Note 6D - Inlet elevation is different than what is shown in the table on sheet 3.
12. Sheet 6 - Note 6E - Elevation on the plan is different than the elevation shown in table on sheet 3.
13. Sheet 9 - Keynote 1 - Calls for new survey monument but did not find it on the plan section. Also. please call out all new survey monuments on plans and the matching standard detail.
14. Sheet 9 - Keynote 4 - This calls out an ADOT detail for curb and gutter. Please provide this detail.

No further comments.

Lance Peterson, P.E.
Marc Avery
Streets and Traffic Maintenance
520-837-6777
12/03/2013 BESPINO1 UTILITY CLEARANCES COT STREETS DIVISION Denied
12/03/2013 BESPINO1 UTILITY CLEARANCES COT WATER NEW DEVELOPMENT Denied
12/03/2013 BESPINO1 UTILITY CLEARANCES PC WASTEWATER MGMT Denied
12/03/2013 BESPINO1 UTILITY CLEARANCES QUEST COMMUNICATION Denied
12/03/2013 BESPINO1 UTILITY CLEARANCES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO Denied
12/03/2013 BESPINO1 UTILITY CLEARANCES COX COMMUNICATION Denied
12/03/2013 BESPINO1 UTILITY CLEARANCES SOUTHWEST GAS CORP Denied
12/03/2013 BESPINO1 UTILITY CLEARANCES EL PASO NATURAL GAS Denied
12/03/2013 BESPINO1 UTILITY CLEARANCES KINDER MORGAN ENERGY Denied
12/06/2013 RICHARD LEIGH DOT ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied December 4, 2013

SUBJECT: Contera - South Phase Lots 73 - 143.

PROJECT REVIEWER: Richard Leigh, DOT, Permits and Codes Section

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Permits and Codes Section has reviewed the PIA Plan and does not recommend approval at this time. The following comments need to be addressed prior to in the subsequent review submittal. Please return redlined drawings with next submittal.

1. Include the plan number "I-2010-016" in the title block of each sheet.

2. Include Development Services Department PIA activity number "T13PI00019
3. "on cover sheet.

4. Sheet 1 and 2, Revise notes as noted on reline drawing.

5. Sheet 5: Clearly show that the intersection of Antrim Loop and Tappen Drive will be constructed with North Phase improvements.

6. Sheet 5: The cross slope of the pedestrian cross walk areas must meet ADA requirements. The proposed pedestrian cross walk area at the intersection of Alvernon Way and Antrim Loop exceeds the maximum allowable cross slope.

7. Sheet 9: Provide curb line at all intersections with the minimum radii per the City Technical Standard Manual Sec. 10-01.3.2.C. The curb line radii proposed does not provide sufficient space for full curb access rap as proposed.

8. Sheet 9: Provide driveway access to the Pima County retention basin at +/- 52+50, RT Alvernon Way. Driveway should be aligned with existing gate and a driveway apron placed per PC/COT Std. 206.

9. Clearly indicate the disposition of all existing utility infrastructure along Alvernon Way.

10. Address comments on redline plan set. Responses can be noted on redline drawings.

Please Refer to redline plans for additional comments and comment details.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6647 or Richard.Leigh@tucsonaz.gov