Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: T13PI00018
Parcel: Unknown

Address:
4050 E BENSON HY

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: PIA - SUBMITTAL

Plan Number - T13PI00018
Review Name: PIA - SUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/08/2014 RICHARD LEIGH PIA COORDINATOR CUSTOMER CALLED; PLANS @ AMBASSSADOR Completed
04/08/2014 RICHARD LEIGH PIA COORDINATOR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
10/07/2013 GARY WITTWER DOT LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied Detail C on page 3 indicates that you are placing 5' of the DSD required bufferyard into the ROW. Have you recieved writen approval from TDOT? If so, from who? I also see that there might be CA that will need landscape. Please note that private irrigation can not cross public streets without an easement being recorded.
10/08/2013 JOSE ORTIZ DOT TRAFFIC REVIEW Denied PLANS # i-2013-015
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T13PI00018
PROJECT NAME: Cantera N Phase 1-72
PROJECT ADDRESS: Benson Hwy & Alvernon Wy
PROJECT REVIEWER: Matthew Geweke, Traffic Eng. Tech

Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the PIA Plan; therefore a revised PIA Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed and resubmit the original redline set of plans for back checking purposes.

1. See redlines on the submitted drawing Shts to address these redline comments:
- Sht 2 please use complete TDOT Signing Notes and update the Striping Notes.
- Throughout the plans, Note [27] Street Name Signs come in pairs. Their size is speed sensitive so use attached info for sign and font formatting, also add this info to Signing Notes Sht with the correct street names, address block numbers and proper compass direction to the included graph.
- Shts 5-10 please collect the signing & striping notes, make the corrections and add them to Sht 12
- STOP signs do have street name signs attached to the post assembly. Please update key note {18}
- Do not install signs so close together that one sign may block another. Hammond Dr. by lot #16 spread the signs out please.
- Please try to install signs on property lines, not on top of the HCS line or in the middle of a possible new driveway.
- Place street name signs on the approach to cross street, not after the intersection.
- Try to keep street name sign posts a bit closer to the depressed wheelchair ramp for better motorist visibility from all intersection approaches
- Please make sure you correctly label and call-out all the entire signing or striping nomenclatures, especially when RPM's are necessary.
- Please make sure that the call-out arrow is pointing to the correct icon.
-Gray scale or superfluous information (right of way lines, elevation lines, grades, survey bearings, landscaping, overhead utilities) on the signing and striping sheets are not useful and add confusion for the signing or striping contractor who is handed a faxed 8.5x11 copied piece of paper/plans.


If you wish to email me at Matthew.Geweke@tucsonaz.gov with a PDF of redlines and the corrected Shts with the revisions of these requested changes, we could expedite the Traffic Eng. acceptance/approval of these plans.

I can also be reached at 791-4259 x76665 with any questions.
Thanks…
10/25/2013 LANCE PETERSON DOT STREET MAINTENANCE REVIEW Denied We have reviewed this plan and have the following comments:

1. Sheet 2 - Note 21 - Please change Paul Rosenboom's phone number to 837-6796.
2. Sheet 3 - Detail E - Missing detail information for the front of the scupper. Please call out grouted rip rap for the back of the scupper.
3. Sheet 3 - Detail G - This appears to be a PC/COT STD Detail for a curb access ramp (STD 207). If so, call out Std Detail. Also truncated domes reference an ADOT detail. Please provide that detail.
4. Sheet 4 - Section A-A - Please call out the pipe size in the detail.
5. Sheet 5 - Please show the scupper inlet elevation shown on sheet 3.
6. Sheet 6 - Show direction of drainage on Braddock Street and Zell Court.
7. Sheet 7 - Show the scupper elevation for Rowan Court.,
8. Sheet 8 - Show scupper invert for Zell Court. Please provide scupper detail and elevations for scupper on Braddock.
9. Sheet 9 - Note 22 - Curb access ramp scales to 16 foot wide opening and the detail shows a 5 foot opening. Please clarify.
10. Please show all new survey monuments and call out the appropriate standard detail for each.

No further comments.

Lance Peterson, P.E.
Marc Avery
Streets and Traffic Maintenance
520-837-6777
12/03/2013 BESPINO1 UTILITY CLEARANCES COT STREETS DIVISION Denied
12/03/2013 BESPINO1 UTILITY CLEARANCES COT WATER NEW DEVELOPMENT Denied
12/03/2013 BESPINO1 UTILITY CLEARANCES PC WASTEWATER MGMT Denied
12/03/2013 BESPINO1 UTILITY CLEARANCES QUEST COMMUNICATION Denied
12/03/2013 BESPINO1 UTILITY CLEARANCES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO Denied
12/03/2013 BESPINO1 UTILITY CLEARANCES COX COMMUNICATION Denied
12/03/2013 BESPINO1 UTILITY CLEARANCES SOUTHWEST GAS CORP Denied
12/03/2013 BESPINO1 UTILITY CLEARANCES EL PASO NATURAL GAS Denied
12/03/2013 BESPINO1 UTILITY CLEARANCES KINDER MORGAN ENERGY Denied
12/04/2013 RICHARD LEIGH DOT ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied December 2, 2013

SUBJECT: Contera - North Phase Lots 1 - 72.

PROJECT REVIEWER: Richard Leigh, DOT, Permits and Codes Section

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Permits and Codes Section has reviewed the PIA Plan and does not recommend approval at this time. The following comments need to be addressed prior to in the subsequent review submittal. Please return redlined drawings with next submittal.

1. Include the plan number "I-2010-015" in the title block of each sheet.

2. Include Development Services Department PIA activity number "T13PI00018"on cover sheet.

3. Sheet 1 and 2, Revise notes as noted on reline drawing.

4. Sheet 9: All roadway infrastructures (curb, sidewalk, pavement and signing Etc.) will need to be constructed for the intersection of Antrim Loop and Tappen Drive.

5. Sheet 9: Provide a roadway cross section, including side slopes, near Sta. 14+00, Tappen Drive. A slope easement may be required for the roadway embankment.

6. Sheet 9: Provide additional details for culvert crossing @ Tappet Drive. Rip Rap aprons Grouter or hand placed, Rip Rap depth, and outlet headwall depth. A drainage easement will be required if the headwalls will be located outside of the right-of-way.

7. Address comments on redline plan set. Responses can be noted on redline drawings.

8. Sheet 9: Provide curb line at all intersections with the minimum radii per the City Technical Standard Manual Sec. 10-01.3.2.C. The curb line radii proposed does not provide sufficient space for full curb access rap as proposed.

Please Refer to redline plans for additional comments and comment details.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6647 or Richard.Leigh@tucsonaz.gov