Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PIA - SUBMITTAL
Plan Number - T13PI00014
Review Name: PIA - SUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/04/2013 | BESPINO1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT STREETS DIVISION | Denied | |
| 09/04/2013 | BESPINO1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT WATER NEW DEVELOPMENT | Denied | |
| 09/04/2013 | BESPINO1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | PC WASTEWATER MGMT | Denied | |
| 09/04/2013 | BESPINO1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | QUEST COMMUNICATION | Denied | |
| 09/04/2013 | BESPINO1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO | Denied | |
| 09/04/2013 | BESPINO1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COX COMMUNICATION | Denied | |
| 09/04/2013 | BESPINO1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | SOUTHWEST GAS CORP | Denied | |
| 09/04/2013 | BESPINO1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Denied | |
| 09/04/2013 | BESPINO1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | KINDER MORGAN ENERGY | Denied | |
| 09/06/2013 | JOSE ORTIZ | DOT TRAFFIC | REVIEW | Approved | Approved |
| 09/09/2013 | GARY WITTWER | DOT LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Aerial shows that there is existing vegetation in ROW, and it appears that it might be removed at the access points. Has this vegetation been included in the NPPO plans? 2. There is existing irrigation within the ROW. This may include lateral lines and valve wires. The plans must address sleeving and protection of these irrigation lines under the new access points, and in the area of sidewalk relocation. 3. Will there be any additional landscape placed in the ROW? If so the plans need to be submitted for review and permitting. 4. If new landscape and irrigation is to be placed back of ROW (bufferyard requirement) - How will public and private be separated? |
| 10/04/2013 | LANCE PETERSON | DOT STREET MAINTENANCE | REVIEW | Denied | We have reviewed this plan and have the following comments: 1. Sheet 4 - Typical Road Cross Section calls out Detail "C" but I did not see a detail C listed. 2. Sheet 4 - Driveway C ross section - This calls out new asphalt per Detail "B" but Detai l B pertains to new verticle curbing. 3. Detail A - Is this pavement section adequate for the expected traffic? Does it match the pavement section on River? No further comments. Lance Peterson P.E. Streets and Traffic Maintenance |
| 11/19/2013 | RICHARD LEIGH | DOT ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | November 18, 2013 SUBJECT: Marana Marketplace Phase III PROJECT REVIEWER: Estevan Tineo P.E., DOT, Permits and Codes Section RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Permits and Codes Section has reviewed the PIA Plan and does not recommend approval at this time. The following comments need to be addressed prior to in the subsequent review submittal. Please return redlined drawings with next submittal. 1. Include the plan number "I-2013-014" in the title block of each sheet. 2. Include Development Services Department PIA activity number "T13PI00014"on cover sheet. 3. Sheet 2 of 4: Profile view must include new curbing and tie in point. 4. Sheet 2 of 4: Show proposed gutter profile. 5. Sheet 2 of 4: Plan should call stationing and offsets for new curbing at beginning, ending, and at deflection points. This includes stationing and offsets for proposed drainage infrastructure. 6. Sheet 2 of 4: Will the existing type-4 Area Inlet (currently behind sidewalk) be relocated? 7. Sheet 2 of 4: Provide a dimensioned details for proposed type 4 catch basins (309, sheet 2 of 3? modified?). Also, provide a hydraulic analysis for the existing and proposed catch basin located at +/- Sta. 2+50, RT. 8. Clearly show how the sidewalk will be routed around the existing type 4 catch basin located at +/- Sta. 2+50, RT, or will exiting catch basin relocated/eliminated? 9. Sheet 2 of 4: call out sidewalk width (6-feet wide along major streets). 10. Sheet 2 of 4: Call out sidewalk horizontal lateral transition. Sidewalk lateral transitions must comply with UDC Technical Manual Sec. 10-1.3.3.B.1.C & D 11. Sheet 2 of 4: Call out truncated domes for new curb access ramps. 12. Provide spot grades for existing curb line along proposed section of curb to be removed. Refer to redline plans for additional comments and comment details. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6646 or Estevan.Tineo@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/26/2013 | RICHARD LEIGH | PIA COORDINATOR | CUSTOMER CALLED; PLANS @ AMBASSSADOR | Approved | |
| 11/26/2013 | RICHARD LEIGH | PIA COORDINATOR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Approved |