Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PIA - SUBMITTAL
Plan Number - T13PI00005
Review Name: PIA - SUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/11/2013 | BESPINO1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT STREETS DIVISION | Denied | |
| 04/11/2013 | BESPINO1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT WATER NEW DEVELOPMENT | Denied | |
| 04/11/2013 | BESPINO1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | PC WASTEWATER MGMT | Denied | |
| 04/11/2013 | BESPINO1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | QUEST COMMUNICATION | Denied | |
| 04/11/2013 | BESPINO1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO | Denied | |
| 04/11/2013 | BESPINO1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COX COMMUNICATION | Denied | |
| 04/11/2013 | BESPINO1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | SOUTHWEST GAS CORP | Denied | |
| 04/11/2013 | BESPINO1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Denied | |
| 04/11/2013 | BESPINO1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | KINDER MORGAN ENERGY | Denied | |
| 04/12/2013 | JOSE ORTIZ | DOT TRAFFIC | REVIEW | Denied | PLAN #: i-2013-005 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T13PI00005 PROJECT NAME: St Augustine Catholic HS offsite public pave imp PROJECT ADDRESS: PROJECT REVIEWER: Matthew Geweke, Traffic Eng Tech Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the PIA Plan; therefore a revised PIA Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plan. Please include a brief response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 1. See redlines on the submitted drawings and address the additional redline comments. During the next submittal please re-submit the prior roll of redlines for back checking purposes. 2. Please update the Signing & Striping Notes from the attached information provided. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76665 or email Matthew.Geweke@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/06/2013 | GARY WITTWER | DOT LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Please concrete in the new median. 4" thick. match existing finish with what is existing to the west. |
| 05/06/2013 | LANCE PETERSON | DOT STREET MAINTENANCE | REVIEW | Denied | We have reviewed these plans and have the following comments: 1. Sheet 2 of 7 - Plans call for new curb access ramps but do not list detail or provide survey information for the layout. (No BCR, ECR etc) 2. Sheet 3 - Pavement Section 22nd Street - Is this pavement section matching what is existing? If not, the plan should state this section or match existing, whichever provides the larger stuctural section. 3. Sheet 3 - Pavement Section Side Street Entrance - This pavement section calls for a mix #1 as the finish course. Typically the City does not allow mix #1 as a finish course. Usually a mix #2, #3 or even a chip seal is placed over mix #1. 4. Sheet 6 and 7 - Title is different than the previous pages. No further comments. Lance Peterson, P.E. 837-6777 |
| 05/10/2013 | BLANCA ESPINO | PIA COORDINATOR | CUSTOMER CALLED; PLANS @ AMBASSSADOR | Completed | |
| 05/10/2013 | RICHARD LEIGH | DOT ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | May 10, 2013 SUBJECT: St. Augustine Catholic High School Offsite Public Paving Improvements PROJECT REVIEWER: Richard Leigh, DOT, Permits and Codes Section RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Permits and Codes Section has reviewed the PIA Plan and does not recommends approval at this time. The following comments need to be addressed in the subsequent review submittal. 1. Sheet1: Include the plan number "I-2013-005" in the title block of each sheet. 2. Sheet 1: Include Development Services Department PIA activity number "T13PI00005"on cover sheet. 3. Sheet1: Indicate administrative address on cover sheet. 4. Sheet 2: Indicate existing and proposed right-of-way limits and recordation information for 22nd Street. 5. Sheet2: Depict sight visibility triangles for new driveway. Will existing utility cabinets interfere with sight distances? Please refer to City of Tucson Technical Manual Sec. 10-01.5.0 SVT requirements. 6. Sheet 2: Reference PC/COT Standard Details for the proposed curb access ramps, median island bull noses, and new to existing curb and sidewalk connections. 7. Sheet 2: Provide stationing, offsets, and elevations for the BCRs and ECRs of all curb returns and median island curb. 8. Sheet 2: Verify that the cross slope of the pedestrian crosswalk area for the new driveway does not exceed 2%. 9. Sheet 2: Indicate the final surface treatment for the median island. 10. Sheet 2: Detail how the roadways shoulder area where the abandoned driveway will be graded and restored to maintain existing drainage patterns. 11. Rezoning condition number 18 requires the installation of a minimum 8' wide multi-use asphalt path along the 22nd Street frontage of the site. If multi-use path is to be installed at this time depict path in plan view and provide a cross section and pavement structural section for the multi-use path. Refer to redline plans for additional comments and comment details. If you have any questions, please contact me at 837-6647 or Richard.Leigh@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/10/2013 | BLANCA ESPINO | PIA COORDINATOR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |