Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: T13PI00004
Parcel: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: PIA - SUBMITTAL

Plan Number - T13PI00004
Review Name: PIA - SUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/04/2013 BESPINO1 UTILITY CLEARANCES COT STREETS DIVISION Denied
04/04/2013 BESPINO1 UTILITY CLEARANCES COT WATER NEW DEVELOPMENT Denied
04/04/2013 BESPINO1 UTILITY CLEARANCES PC WASTEWATER MGMT Denied
04/04/2013 BESPINO1 UTILITY CLEARANCES QUEST COMMUNICATION Denied
04/04/2013 BESPINO1 UTILITY CLEARANCES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO Denied
04/04/2013 BESPINO1 UTILITY CLEARANCES COX COMMUNICATION Denied
04/04/2013 BESPINO1 UTILITY CLEARANCES SOUTHWEST GAS CORP Denied
04/04/2013 BESPINO1 UTILITY CLEARANCES EL PASO NATURAL GAS Denied
04/04/2013 BESPINO1 UTILITY CLEARANCES KINDER MORGAN ENERGY Denied
04/08/2013 GARY WITTWER DOT LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Please address the Native Plant Reservation Ordinance. It appears that there will be a lot of plant impact in the wash areas, with an NPPO inventory and mitigation plan.
04/08/2013 JOSE ORTIZ DOT TRAFFIC REVIEW Denied PLAN #: i-2013-003
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T13PI00004
PROJECT NAME: UofA ~ Science Park Dr / Kolb Rd
PROJECT ADDRESS:
PROJECT REVIEWER: Matthew Geweke, Traffic Eng Tech

Resubmittal Required:
Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the PIA Plan; therefore a revised PIA Plan is required for re-submittal.
The following items must be revised or added to the plan. Please include a brief response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.

1. Is Science Park Dr being submitted to City of Tucson for annex?
If not, please ignore courtesy review of that section of roadway and just concern red-line review to my Kolb Rd comments. Especially the Sta. Distances for the "Signal Ahd" W3-3 signs.

2. See redlines on the submitted drawings and address the additional redline comments. During the next submittal please re-submit the roll of redlines for back checking purposes.

3. Please update the Signing & Striping Notes from the attached information provided.


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76665 or email Matthew.Geweke@tucsonaz.gov
05/01/2013 LANCE PETERSON DOT STREET MAINTENANCE REVIEW Denied We have reviewed this plan and have the following comments:

1. Construction Notes: For ease of construction please provide construction notes on the plan sheets that have called out items.
2. Construction Notes 5-3-4, For clarification, is this calling for milling out 4-inches of asphalt, pulverizing what remains, and then paving with pavement section number 1?
3. Sheet 15 of 32 - Plan calls to remove existing pipes but I did not see a material type or size.

No further comments.

Lance Peterson, P.E.
Streets and Traffic Maintenance
837-6777
05/01/2013 RICHARD LEIGH DOT ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied April 26, 2013

SUBJECT: U of A - Science Park Drive / Kolb Road Improvements

PROJECT REVIEWER: Richard Leigh, DOT, Permits and Codes Section

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Permits and Codes Section has reviewed the PIA Plan and does not recommends approval at this time. The following comments need to be addressed in the subsequent review submittal.

1. Sheet1: Include the plan number "I-2013-003" in the title block of each sheet.

2. Sheet 1: Include Development Services Department PIA activity number "T13PI00004"on cover sheet.

3. Sheet 1: Use City of Tucson DOT Standard title block and drafting standards. Include Science Park Drive and Kolb Road in plan title.

4. Sheet 1: Include standard PIA notes, see attached.

5. Sheet: Provide a thickened edge for un-curbed asphalt pavement sections and provide a dimensioned detail.

6. Sheet 7, A3: Will steel be provided in the edge beam portion of the headwall extension similar to what is shown in cross section A-A & C-C of ADOT Std. Dtl. 6.01?

7. Provide stationing and offsets for beginning and end, BCR's, ECR's, and curve radii data for the proposed raised median island. Additionally, indicate final surface treatment for the median island.

8. Provide details for the proposed handrail along box culvert headwalls. Indicate limits, call out standard detail or provide a detail, and provide anchoring details.

Drainage Report comments: Estevan Tineo

1. Since this project is related to private development, a Floodplain Use Permit must be obtained from PDSD. Charter Schools/Public schools are not exempt from Federal and Local floodplain regulations.

2. The report must discuss how this project will comply with FEMA floodplain requirements. The proposed roadway is within a FEMA flood zone. The report must discuss how this proposed roadway will impact this floodplain, and how the improvements will meet FEMA requirements.

3. Proposed Conditions: The report must demonstrate that the existing drainage channel has the capacity to convey the proposed flow of 578-cfs. In addition, the proposed culvert design must take into account this tail-water.

4. Proposed Conditions: The report must discuss some design details for the proposed berm (levee) needed to contain the proposed 578-cfs. Whom will be responsible for maintenance of this structure?

5. Proposed Conditions: The report must discuss how the proposed box culvert ( 8-5 x 3 ) will be accessed for maintenance. Also, the minimum box culvert height is typically 4-feet for maintenance issues.

6. The report mentions an interim channel? Is there an interim culvert and drainage design? Is the interim channel for an interim roadway please explain.

7. Proposed Conditions: Whom owns the channel that the proposed 578-cfs will drain into?


Refer to redline plans for additional comments and comment details.

If you have any questions, please contact me at 837-6647 or Richard.Leigh@tucsonaz.gov
05/03/2013 BLANCA ESPINO PIA COORDINATOR CUSTOMER CALLED; PLANS @ AMBASSSADOR Completed
05/06/2013 BLANCA ESPINO PIA COORDINATOR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed