Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: FLOODPLAIN
Permit Number - T13OT01460
Review Name: FLOODPLAIN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/13/2014 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: January 13, 2014 TO: Tim Robertson, R.A. SUBJECT: 3322 W Lost Starr Pl, Grading Plan Review LOCATION: Wildcat Pass S02-008 - lot 49, Sec 20, T14S, R13E REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold P.E. FLOODPLAIN INFO: 2360 L X unshaded, local jurisdictional floodplain at SE corner of lot ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP13-0246 (grading), T13OT01460 (floodplain), T13CM07475 (bldg) Summary: Engineering Division has reviewed the development package including a copy of the grading plan. Engineering does not recommend approval of the plan until the following comments are addressed. GRADING/FLOODPLAIN COMMENTS: 1) Admin Manual Sec.2-06.4.8.B: Show and label all easements per Final Plat on planviews. The information within the lot should be shown, and labeled per Final Plat, including dimensions and bearings of lot boundary and all easements. 2) Tech Manual Sec.2-01.4.1.D: Provide copy of soils report - geotechnical engineer should provide acceptance for stability of proposed 1:1 (H:V) slopes. 3) Tech Manual Sec.2-01.4.1.C.4: Clarify the following grading comments: i) Tech Man Sec.2-01.10.5: Revise details A & B to show interceptor swales (with grouted rock or rip rap with filter fabric) showing dimensions for depth and width of swales, which are required to be installed along the top of all cut slopes - minimum depth of 12-in and a minimum width of 30-in. ii) Assure section details include Property line, 2-ft setback, interceptor swale at top of slope, runout for proposed slope, driveway drainage channel, driveway width, drainage channel, and additional runout space for cut/fill slopes. iii) Show proposed spot elevations along west building pad area to assure positive gradient around structure. iv) Tech Man Sec.2-01.9.2: Show 2-ft setbacks at north lot boundary near driveway and pad grading. v) Show utility lines on planview (gas/water/electric). vi) Driveway sections do not show cut conditions proposed per topography and proposed contour grades. Revise grading/disturbance limits to include cut slopes. vii) Label driveway material. viii) Revised Disturbance limits to provide staging area. If construction disturbance exceeds approved plans, Inspector may issue Stop Work Order or request revised grading plan. 4) Address the following comments regarding the notes: i) Update Grading Note 2 to reflect current grading standard reference; replace "DS Sec11-01" with "Technical Standards Manual 2-01.0" ii) Site Note 7: Reference soils / geotechnical report(s) / addenda for lot and/or subdivision. Address redline comments and return redlines with resubmittal. Expedited counter review may be requested for Engineering review at resubmittal. I can be reached at 837-4934 if you have questions. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department City of Tucson |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/29/2014 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/29/2014 | SHANAE POWELL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |