Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T13CM07487
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/22/2014 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/24/2014 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP13-0245 approval is required. |
| 01/24/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET A2.0; NORTH ELEVATION: NOTE 7 ON THIS ELEVATION IS NOT CORRECT. REVISE. 2. SHEET A2.0; SOUTH AND EAST ELEVATIONS: REVISE NOTE 7 ON THESE ELEVATIONS TO NOTE 8. 3. SHEET A4.0; METAL BUILDING NOTE: ADD VERBIAGE TO THIS NOTE INDICATING THE DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS OF THE METAL BUILDING MANUFACTURER HAVE BEEN APPROVED FOR CONFORMANCE TO THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN. THE APPROVAL NOTE MUST BE SIGNED AND DATED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL OF THE METAL BUILDING DRAWINGS TO THE CITY OF TUCSON. 4. SHEET S1.0; STRUCTURAL NOTES (GENERAL CONSTRUCTION): NOTE 7 MUST ALSO INCLUDE VERBIAGE IN THIS NOTE INDICATING THE DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS OF THE METAL BUILDING MANUFACTURER HAVE BEEN APPROVED FOR CONFORMANCE TO THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN. THE APPROVAL NOTE MUST BE SIGNED AND DATED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL OF THE METAL BUILDING DRAWINGS TO THE CITY OF TUCSON. 5. SHEET S1.0; STRUCTURAL NOTES (GENERAL CONSTRUCTION): THE SEISMIC LOAD REFERENCES THE 2006 IBC AND SECTION 1617.5. REVISE THE CODE EDITION AND SECTION TO THE 2012 IBC. 6. SHEET S1.0; STRUCTURAL NOTES (GENERAL CONSTRUCTION): THE SOIL BEARING REFERENCES THE IBC TABLE 1804.2. REVISE THE TABLE TO THE 2012 IBC. 7. SHEET S1.0; STRUCTURAL NOTES (CONCRETE FOUNDATION): THE TABLE REFERENCE IN NOTE 1 IS NOT CORRECT FOR THE 2012 IBC. REVISE. 8. SHEET S1.0; STRUCTURAL NOTES (CONCRETE FOUNDATION): THE IBC SECTION REFERENCE IN NOTE 10 IS NOT CORRECT FOR THE 2012 IBC. REVISE. 9. SHEET S1.0; STRUCTURAL NOTES (CONCRETE MASONRY): THE IBC TABLE REFERENCE IN NOTE 2 IS NOT CORRECT FOR THE 2012 IBC. REVISE. 10. SHEET S1.1; FOUNDATION KEY PLAN NOTES: NOTE 3 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 11. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 01/24/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 01/27/2014 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ENG will provide approval of the building plan upon approval of the DP Package. JG |
| 01/29/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 01/29/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Clarify the size of the water service to the building. Keynote 5 on sheet P1.0 calls for a 1" service from the existing ¾" meter but keynote 22 on sheet C1.0 calls for a 1-1/4" water service to the building. |
| 01/29/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 02/03/2014 | JEFF DRUMM | LANDFILL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/04/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/06/2014 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 02/06/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |