Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - - 1ST
Permit Number - T13CM06849
Review Name: REVISION - - 1ST
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/18/2014 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Building plan can not be approved until it is verified that a site plan (Development Plan Package) is approved showing all revisions to the parking lot. This plan does not meet the last approved DP that can be found on PRO, D09-0032. For all site changes, relocating parking, handicap access ramps, handicap parking spaces, sidewalks, etc. a revised DP Package will be required to ensure conformance with the UDC, AM ans TSM codes. JG |
| 04/23/2014 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The changes on the site shall require a development package. |
| 04/25/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET A0.1: PROVIDE A SUMMARY OF THE DELTA 4 REVISIONS THAT APPLY TO THIS SUBMITTAL. 2. SHEET A2.1: ADD THE DELTA 4 REVISION INTO THE TITLE BLOCK. 3. SHEET A2.1; KEYNOTES: NOTE 6 REFERENCES SHEET A2.4 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON FLOOR TRANSITIONS. IS THAT A REVISED DETAIL OR AN ORIGINAL? IF REVISED, PROVIDE SHEET. 4. SHEET A2.1; KEYNOTES: NOTES 16 AND 20 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 5. SHEET A2.1: THERE ARE MANY REFERENCES TO ELEVATIIONS, SECTIONS, DETAILS, AND WALL TYPES ON THE PLANS THAT HAVE NO SHEETS IN THIS REVISION SET. VERIFY NO REVISIONS WERE MADE TO THOSE SHEETS. 6. SHEET S1.3; KEYNOTES: IN NOTE 1, PROVIDE THE CONNECTION OF THE STEEL DECK TO THE STRUCTURAL MEMBER. 7. SHEET S2.2 (COLUMN FOOTING DETAIL); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 14): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE TOP AND BOTTOM REINFORCING IN THE COLUMN FOOTING, WHILE THE DRAWINGS INDICATE ONLY BOTTOM REINFORCING. CLARIFY. 8. GENERAL: IF THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE VALUATION OF THIS TENANT IMPROVEMENT DUE TO THE CHANGE IN SCOPE, PROVIDE THAT CHANGE. DO NOT INCLUDE THE COST OF THE NEW CANOPY, AS THIS IS ADDED BY THE CITY OF TUCSON FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION. THE ORIGINAL TENANT IMPROVEMENT WAS VALUED AT $1,500,000. 9. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/29/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |