Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T13CM06759
Parcel: 116193740

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T13CM06759
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/12/2013 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET AN-0.0; INDEX OF DRAWINGS: SHEET A-8.40 IS LISTED TWICE, AND SHEET A-8.41 IS NOT LISTED. REVISE.
2. SHEET AN-1.0; CODE REFERENCES: ADD THE 2009 EDITION OF THE ICC/ANSI A117.1 TO THIS LIST.
3. SHEETS AN-3.0 AND AN-3.2; KEY NOTES: THE THREE KEY NOTES LISTED WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE EXITING PLANS. VERIFY.
4. SHEETS AN-3.0, AN-3.1, AN-3.2, AND AN-3.3: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE ROOM IDENTIFICATION NAMES AND NUMBERS.
5. SHEET AN-3.0; EXIT SEPARATION: THE TABLE INDICATES THREE EXITS FOR THE TENANT SPACE, BUT FOUR ARE SHOWN ON THE PLAN. EXITS #01 AND #04 ARE TOO CLOSE TO BE COUNTED SEPARATELY (57'-7"), AND EXITS #02 AND #03 ARE ALSO TOO CLOSE. VERIFY.
6. SHEETS AN-3.0 AND AN-3.2; FLOOR PLANS: THE PLANS INDICATE STAIR #01 IS PART OF AN ADJACENT TENANT SPACE THAT IS VACANT. THEREFORE, THE EXIT AT THE FIRST FLOOR IS INTO ANOTHER TENANT SPACE (AS DEPICTED ON THE PLAN). CLARIFY.
7. SHEET AN-3.0; EXITING PLAN: EXITS #02 AND #04 WILL RECEIVE THE SECOND FLOOR OCCUPANTS (287 OCCUPANTS AT EACH EXIT) IN ADDITION TO THE FIRST FLOOR OCCUPANTS NOTED. THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS EXITING AT THESE TWO EXITS EXCEEDS THE OCCUPANCY CAPACITY (227 OCCUPANTS) LISTED ON THE PLAN. CLARIFY.
8. SHEET AN-3.2; FLOOR PLAN: THE TITLE OF THE PLAN INDICATES THE "SECOND FLOOR EXISTING PLAN". SHOULD THIS BE THE 'EXITING' PLAN? VERIFY.
9. SHEET AN-3.2; EXIT SEPARATION: THE TABLE INDICATES THREE EXITS FOR THE TENANT SPACE. THERE ARE ONLY TWO EXITS FROM THIS LEVEL OF THE TENANT SPACE. VERIFY.
10. SHEET AN-3.2; EXITING PLAN: STAIRS #01 AND #02 INDICATE AN OCCUPANCY CAPACITY OF THE EXITS OF 170 (340 TOTAL OCCUPANTS). THE CALCULATED OCCUPANCY OF THE SECOND FLOOR IS 573. CLARIFY.
11. SHEET AN-3.3; FLOOR PLAN: ADD THE PLAN TITLE (SECOND FLOOR OCCUPANCY PLAN) UNDER THE FLOOR PLAN.
12. SHEETS 01A-1.0 AND 02A-1.0: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE PARTITION SCHEDULE.
13. SHEET 01A-1.0; KEY NOTES: NOTE 3 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
14. SHEET 01A-4.1; KEY NOTES: NOTE 6 (LOCATED IN THE CORRIDOR) WAS NOT LISTED IN THE KEY NOTES. VERIFY.
15. SHEET 01A-4.1; KEY NOTES: NOTES 4 AND 5 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
16. SHEET 02A-2.0; KEY NOTES: NOTES 6 AND 18 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
17. SHEET 02A-3.0; KEY NOTES: NOTES 8 AND 9 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
18. SHEET 02A-4.1; KEY NOTES: NOTES 3, 4, AND 5 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
19. SHEET 02A-5.0: IS THIS SHEET FOR REFERENCE ONLY AS NOTED? VERIFY.
20. SHEET 02RS-1.0: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE SIGNAGE SCHEDULE.
21. SHEET A-6.1; PLANS 1 AND 2: DARKEN THE LINE QUALITY FOR THESE PLANS.
22. SHEET A-7.0; ELEVATION 17: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE GRAB BAR DIMENSIONS.
23. SHEET A-8.0; DETAILS 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, AND 11: PROVIDE THE SPACING OF THE DIAGONAL BRACES, OR REFERENCE DETAILS 12/A-8.01 AND 13/A8.01.
24. SHEET A-8.0, DETAILS 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, AND 12: A REFERENCE IS MADE TO DETAILS 14 AND 15 ON SHEET A-8.01. REVISE (NO DETAILS 14 AND 15 ON THAT SHEET).
25. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
11/15/2013 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Denied PLEASE PROVIDE AN EXITING PLAN THAT COMPLIES WITH CHAPTER 10 IF THE IFC. INDICATE WHICH LOCKING (ACCESS CONTROL OR MAGNET) WILL BE USED AND INDICATE HOW YOU WILL COMPLY WITH THE APPROPRIATE CODE SECTION WHEN APPLYING THESE LOCKING DEVICES.
11/19/2013 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied T13CM06759
201 N Bonita #101
Carrington College

1. Per City of Tucson Commercial Submittal Requirements, provide the tennent improvement load along with the service building load, TI load already provided in panel HD.
2. Per City of Tucson Commercial Submittal Requirements,
provide 2012 IECC Light Budget Calculations and Switching required, if using Com Chect check all required boxes in checklist.

Ray T Majuta
Elect Plan Review
PDSD, Tucson
11/20/2013
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov
11/20/2013 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied Provide the size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly serving this suite along with the total water demand seen by the meter. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
11/20/2013 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide a site drawing showing the size and route of the water supply to this suite along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
2. Provide a site drawing showing the size, route, and slope of the building sewer and the location of its connection to the public sewer. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
3. Provide a design for the mounting shelf for the water heater along with structural calculations to show that the water heater is safely supported from the building structure. Reference: Section 301.2, IPC 2012.
4. Provide fixture descriptions for all plumbing fixtures not specified in the architectural drawings (e.g. water closets, lavatories, and urinals). Reference: Section 402, IPC 2012 and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
5. Verify the suitability of cast iron sanitary drainage pipe underground for this building. The soil under the building was identified as being highly corrosive in the original soils report and no metallic pipe was used in the original building construction.
6. Provide accessible cleanouts in the island sink vent system (detail 6/P0.03) to permit rodding of all portions of the vents located below the flood rim of the fixture. Reference: Section 916.3, IPC 2012.
7. Clarify where detail 6/P0.03 is located; labs 205 and 210 do not have island vents but labs 206 and 209 do.
8. Verify that all of the vents (except for island vents) rise vertically to at least 6" above the flood rims of the fixtures they protect prior to running horizontally. See FS-1 in room 212 and detail 6/P0.03. Reference: Section 905.4, IPC 2012.
11/29/2013 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Clarify the occupancy classifications and the occupant density used in the ventilation calculations. The occupancy classifications should closely match the actual occupancy and the occupant density used for calculating the minimum required ventilation is to be based on Table 403.3, IMC 2012 or an approved engineering analysis of the specific occupancy type. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2012.
2. The ventilation calculations indicate that room 212, the compressor room, has no supply air but the 2nd floor mechanical plan shows that it receives 100 CFM from VAV 2-9.
12/04/2013 ELIZABETH EBERBACH ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved PDSD Engineering Reviewer will stamp plans when all reviewers ready to approve. Please be aware that this site has a Letter of Revalidation from FEMA which provides X-zone floodplain status. For future submittals for future projects for this lot, please submit a copy of the documents provided in thsi submittal package, which includes copy of FEMA letter and plat. E Leibold 837-4934

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/19/2013 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
12/19/2013 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed