Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T13CM06638
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/13/2013 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T13CM06638 6525 E Littletown Road Medical Marijuana Cultivation Use - Building Plan Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 14, 2013 DUE DATE: November 25, 2013 COMMENTS: 01. After reviewing the building plans and comparing the footprint to the footprint on the site plan it has been noted that the building square footage exceeds the 3,000 maximum square feet allowed by the M.M Ordinance 10850. The dimensions on the plans must be measured from the outside edge of the finished wall. The plans indicate two dimensions, one on the foundation plans and one on the floor plan. By using the foundation dimensions to calculate the square footage, the square footage is about 288 square feet over the allowed maximum. The dimension on the floor plan is from the center of the wall which cannot be used to calculate the overall square footage. The GFA is measured from the outside edge of the finished wall. Dimension the floor plan based on the finished wall. The overall square footage must be no greater than 3,000 square feet. 02. The site plan submitted with the building plans has been changed after the plan was stamped by the reviewers. This plan will not be accepted. The dimensions labeled on the building footprint now indicate a greater than 3,000 square feet. Zoning will have to re-review the site plan package to verify the changes made. The height of the building also has changed and does not match what was approved by zoning. The DP site plan indicates a maximum building height of 16 feet. The building plans 19'-4". 03. Zoning cannot approve the building plans until the Development Package Site plan has been revised and re-reviewed by zoning and others site plan reviewers to verify the changes. Zoning cannot approve until the DP site plan has been re-approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site and building plans |
| 11/14/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/15/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET A-1; KEYNOTES: NOTE 11 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 2. SHEET A-2; BUILDING SECTION: KEYNOTE 8 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE SECTION. VERIFY. 3. SHEET A-2; BUILDING SECTION: PROVIDE A DETAIL ON THE DRAWINGS FOR THE FLASHING AT THE TOP OF THE MASONRY WALL TO THE METAL BUILDING. 4. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE THE DESIGN CALCULATIONS FOR THE MASONRY WALL FOOTING. 5. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEETS 1 THROUGH 4: THE FOOTINGS FOR THE MAIN BUILDING COLUMNS WERE DESIGNED FOR CONCENTRIC COLUMN/PIER LOADS, BUT ARE ACTUALLY ECCENTRIC LOADS (ALONG WITH HORIZONTAL LOADS FROM THE METAL BUILDING MANUFACTURER SHEET J1-1.0). REVISE THE CALCULATIONS AND DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED. 6. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEETS 5 AND 6: THE FOOTING FOR THE ENDWALL COLUMNS INDICATES ONLY A 560 POUND CONCENTRATED LOAD APPLIED BY THE COLUMN/PIER ON THE FOOTING. THE METAL BUILDING CALCULATIONS (SHEET J1-1.0) INDICATE GRAVITY, UPLIFT, AND HORIZONTAL LOADS. REVISE THE CALCULATIONS AND DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED. 7. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEETS 7 THROUGH 9: THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE MASONRY WALL IS BRACED AT THE 5' HEIGHT. VERIFY. 8. GENERAL: PROVIDE MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS ON THE DRAWINGS (CONCRETE, MASONRY, REINFORCING STEEL, ANCHOR BOLTS, ETC.) USED IN THIS SHELL PERMIT. REFERENCE THE METAL BUILDING DRAWINGS FOR THE BUILDING COMPONENT SPECIFICATIONS. 9. GENERAL: PROVIDE DESIGN LOADS ON THE DRAWINGS (WIND, SEISMIC, ASSUMED SOIL BEARING, ETC.) USED IN THIS SHELL PERMIT. 10. GENERAL: PROVIDE DESIGN CODES ON THE DRAWINGS USED IN THIS SHELL PERMIT. 11. GENERAL: IS THE CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB UNREINFORCED? VERIFY. 12. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 11/15/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 11/20/2013 | CPIERCE1 | WATER | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 11/20/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 11/20/2013 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/20/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/20/2013 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |