Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T13CM06448
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/22/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PP EGY1 and E7.0 have been omitted from this set of drawings for unknown reasons. Please provide IECC compliance certificates and Envelope complinace certificates. |
| 01/23/2014 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/29/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify the temperature of the tempered water being circulated to the building; it is 105F in detail 4/P4.2 and 110F on sheet P3.1. Tempered water for lavatories located in public restrooms shall be delivered through a mixing valve conforming to ASSE 1070. The specified temperature mixing valve, TMV-A (TMV-1 in detail 4/P4.2), is certified to ASSE 1017. Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012. [Initial comment: Show the thermostatic mixing valve in details 14 and 17/P4.0 installed in a manner consistent with the manufacturer's instructions: below the sink. The valve is listed to ASSE 1070 for single fixture applications only. The manufacturer also recommends a maximum temperature setting of 105°F (41°C). Reference: Section 303.2, IPC 2012.] 2. At a minimum design flow rate of 25 GPM for a siphonic, flush-valve water closet, a 1" Type L copper pipe has a flow velocity of 9.7 FPS. Reference: Table 604.3, IPC 2012. [Initial comment: Verify that the pipe sizes called out for the water closet flush valves will not result in water velocities greater than that recommended by the pipe manufacturer (e.g. limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for copper piping). Reference: Table 604.3, IPC 2012.] 3. Island venting is not permitted to be used except for sinks and lavatories. Reference: Section 916.1 and Table 909.1, IPC 2012. [Initial comment: Verify that all of the vents (except for vents serving interceptors located outdoors) rise vertically to at least 6" above the flood rims of the fixtures they protect prior to running horizontally. Reference: Section 905.4, IPC 2012.] 4. Comment not resolved; sheet A3.1 has not been included in either of the drawing sets. [Initial comment: Provide roof drainage and hydraulic scupper size calculations based on the 100-year hourly rainfall rate for Tucson, 3" per hour. Reference: Sections 1101.7, 1106.1, 1106.4, and 1108.3, IPC 2012.] 5. Comment not resolved; sheet A3.1 has not been included in either of the drawing sets. [Initial comment: Clarify the method of roof drainage being used: Sheet A3.1 shows scuppers and downspouts along the east side of the building, sheet MP3.0 shows gutters along the east and west sides of the building with downspouts.] 6. Comment not resolved; sheet A3.1 has not been included in either of the drawing sets. [Initial comment: Show how storm water will be drained from the area behind the tall parapet on the east side of the building (sheet A3.1).] 7. Comment not resolved; sheet A3.1 has not been included in either of the drawing sets. [Initial comment: Provide hydraulic calculations for the secondary (overflow) roof drainage from the collector boxes. Reference: Section 1108, IPC 2012.] 8. See Figure 408.4, IFGC 2012 and revise the configuration of the sediment traps in detail 8/P4.0 so that the natural gas will be forced to make a 90-degree direction change to effectively separate sediment from the gas stream (see detail 11/P4.0 as an example). [Initial comment: Revise the configuration of the natural gas sediment trap, as shown in details 08/P4.0 and 04/P4.2, to comply with the requirements of Section 408.4, IFGC 2012 (i.e. the sediment trap is to be located downstream of the appliance shutoff valve, as close to the appliance as possible).] |
| 01/29/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/29/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The Envelope Compliance Certificates were not included with this submittal. [Initial comment: Provide two copies of the Envelope Compliance Certificate on 8.5" x 11" paper; the version on sheet EGY1 is illegible. Complete the Envelope Compliance Certificate by checking the appropriate line items in Section 3, the Air Leakage, Component Certification, and Vapor Retarder Requirements. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.] 2. The Mechanical Compliance Certificates were not included with this submittal. [Initial comment: Provide two copies of the Mechanical Compliance Certificate on 8.5" x 11" paper. Complete the Mechanical Compliance Certificate by checking the appropriate line items in Section 4, the Requirements Checklist. Supporting documentation shall be either on the drawings or in the project manual. A simple note, such as requiring the HVAC controls to "meet the requirements of Section C403.2, IECC 2012" is insufficient.] |
| 02/03/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Chuck E Cheese's - 6125 E. Speedway T13CM06448 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 3, 2014 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 3. Until the development package has been approved the building plans cannot be approved. 4. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 02/06/2014 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | REPLY 113 1. As per ICC A117.1, Figure 404.2.5 (c), the required 4'-0" clearance is front the end of the open door to the finished wall surface not to the door frame. Please correct. REPLY 116 2. The reference shown on sheet ES1.0 needs to be corrected from 1205 to 105. ADDITIONAL COMMENT 3. At details 01/A11 and 12/A11, the only urinal that is accessibly compliant is the center urinal. Please remove the accessible clearance boxes on the outter two urinals and identify the center urinal as accessible. END OF REVIEW |
| 02/10/2014 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DP PLAN NEEDS TO BE APPROVED FIRST |