Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Active
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG-MODEL PLAN/ENGINE/WALK THRU
Permit Number - T13CM06442
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG-MODEL PLAN/ENGINE/WALK THRU
Review Status: Active
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/06/2013 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | P&DS TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician PROJECT: T13CM06442 10908 East Placita Marimba New SFR TRANSMITTAL: November 6, 2013 COMMENTS: the following comments are for a single-family residence (SFR). 1) This site is located in the R-1 zone (UDC Section 4.7.8). A single-family residence (SFR) is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2). See Use-Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.5 - 9. 2) A copy of the plot plan instructions has been included with these comments. The model is on one side of the sheet and a list of content requirements is on the other. 3) Submit the revised site plan with the grading plan (DP13-0211) for this site. The information on both plans must match. See the comments for the grading plan. 4) Provide dimensioned elevation drawings. Provide the correct legal description (Rancho Cancion West Amended. Lot 122) on the plot plan. 5) Provide lot coverage calculation on the site plan. List the square footage of all enclosed structures, additions and vehicle use areas. Provide the total square footage. Divide that total by the lot square footage to get the percentage of coverage. The maximum lot coverage is seventy percent (70%). See UDC Table 6.3-2.A. 6) Identify the zoning of the adjacent parcels (R-1) on the plot plan. |
| 11/18/2013 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Note: Rancho Cancion project, needs grading plan approval prior to approval of the building permit. New development that occurs on parcels or proposed subdivisions that include property designated as HDZ shall be reviewed for compliance with these standards in accordance with Section UDC 5.2. HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT ZONE (HDZ) Add the following notes to site plan: Vegetation Retention and Revegetation a. Vegetation Retention (1) Existing viable and transplantable trees with four inch or greater trunk diameter and cacti shall be preserved in their original locations, except for building sites and access and utilities serving building sites. (2) When retention of the above trees and cacti in their original locations is not possible due to building site location, the trees and cacti shall be salvaged and replanted in areas requiring revegetation, whenever possible. b. Revegetation All cut or fillslopes that are no steeper than three horizontal to one vertical and all utility trenches or septic leaching fields that are not located in parking or driveway areas shall be revegetated in compliance with the following standards: (1) All plants used in revegetation shall be the same as the native vegetation on the site prior to grading or clearing or any adjacentsite; and, (2) Revegetation shall be accomplished with the following minimum standards for plants: (a) Desert trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size with a minimum trunk diameter of two inches measured at the soil level, or large specimen cactus shall be placed at the same vegetation density found on the site prior to any clearing, grubbing, or grading; and, (b) Seeds for trees, desert shrubs, and grasses shall be planted with a density adequate to control erosion and may use one of the following methods of planting: Raked into the soil with appropriate mulch materials; hydroseeding; anchored mulches; or established on jute, rolled straw, or similar material. Another method may be approved by PDSD. (3) A temporary watering system shall be installed until the revegetation materials are established. 3. Slope Stabilization All slopes steeper than a ratio of three horizontal to one vertical, with the exception of retaining walls, shall be stabilized with properly engineered stone riprapping or sculptured rock as follows: a. Stone rip-rapping shall be hand-placed on the slope; b. The stabilizing material used shall blend with the natural appearance of the site or lot and the surrounding terrain; and, c. Vegetation retention and revegetation should be used in conjunction with riprapping. Ensure that all Engineering comments and concerns are addressed |
| 11/22/2013 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Building permit may not be approved or issued until grading permit is approved and issued. |
| 11/25/2013 | RAFAEL CANCINO | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review | STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS Date: November 27, 2013 Activity: T13CM06442 Address: Rancho Cancion West - Lot 122 Applicant: Miramonte Homes Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. In order to facilitate a shorter back check time, please provide revised plans and calculations, highlighting any changes or with a written response to each of the notated items indicating action taken. SCOPE OF REVIEW: The scope of this plan review covers architectural, plumbing, mechanical, energy conservation and electrical. All code references are to the 2012 International Residential Code and 2012 International Energy Conservation Code. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions and concerns before permit approval. STRUCTURAL PLAN: 1. Post-tensioned slab must rest on 12" of engineered fill, per LMT's geotechnical report dated August 8, 2013. 2. Missing LSTHD8 hold down at east wall of garage. 3. Change detail 2 on sheet S4.2 to detail 6 on sheet S5.3, per structural calculations. 4. Missing wedge anchor @ 32" o/c on south wall of powder room. If you have any questions please contact: Rafael Cancino (520) 909-4891 City of Tucson Residential Plan Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/27/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | RECEIVED |