Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T13CM06405
Parcel: 13731373A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T13CM06405
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/25/2013 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office
FROM: David Rivera
Principal Planner

PROJECT: T13CM06405
5075 S Midvale Park Road
Midvale Car Wash - Building Plan Review

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 25, 2013

DUE DATE: November 19, 2013

COMMENTS:

01. Zoning has reviewed the building plans and compared them to the current set of the development package site plan drawings for consistency as it relates to the zoning purview of the building plans. As of this review zoning cannot approve the building plans until the development package site plan is approved. The following comments area related to the zoning review purview. Please address the comments and include a response letter stating how the zoning comments have been addressed and resubmit for review.

02. Zoning could not find any plan sheets in the building plans package for the canopy adjacent to the main building. Include the building drawings for the canopy with the next building plan submittal.

03. The height of the tower that is adjacent to the Midvale Park Road frontage is dimensioned with a maximum tower height of 27 feet for the west elevation. It does not appear that the minimum setback from the back of future curb has been met. Review the location and see the zoning reviewer's comments for the development package about the future setback requirement. It is acknowledged that development package is in for review. If the building setback for the tower becomes a setback issue, zoning cannot approve the building plans until the proper process for the setback is completed.



If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 837-4957
10/31/2013 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET A-1; FLOOR PLAN: IN THE STORAGE ROOM, THERE IS A KEYNOTE 1 INDICATED BY THE DOOR. IS THIS CORRECT (TYPICAL INDICATOR FOR THE FIRE EXTINGUISHER IS NOT SHOWN)? VERIFY.
2. SHEET A-1; FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 2 REFERENCES IBC SECTION 1008.1.8.3 FOR THE EXIT SIGN REQUIREMENTS. REVISE THAT REFERENCE TO THE 2012 IBC.
3. SHEET A-1.1; DOOR LEGEND AND FLOOR PLAN A: REMOVE THE REVISION CLOUDS AND THE TITLEBLOCK REVISION REFERENCE. THIS IS A FIRST REVIEW FOR THIS PROJECT.
4. SHEET A-1.1 (FIRST FLOOR PLAN E); SHEET A-1.2 (DETAIL D): THE DETAIL TITLE INDICATES TOWER/OFFICE, WHILE THE DETAIL IS SHOWN ON THE PLAN IN THE COMMAND ROOM. CLARIFY.
5. SHEET A-1.1 (FIRST FLOOR PLAN E); SHEET A-1.2 (DETAIL F): THE DETAIL INDICATES THE EQUIPMENT ROOM, WHILE THE DETAIL IS SHOWN ON THE PLAN IN THE STORAGE ROOM. CLARIFY.
6. SHEET A-1.1 (FIRST FLOOR PLAN E); SHEET A-1.2 (DETAIL G): THE DETAIL INDICATES AN EQUIPMENT ROOM SLAB, WHILE THE DETAIL IS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AT THE OFFICE. CLARIFY.
7. SHEET A-3.1; TOWER PLAN A: REMOVE THE REVISION CLOUD AND THE TITLEBLOCK REVISION REFERENCE. THIS IS A FIRST REVIEW FOR THIS PROJECT.
8. SHEETS A-5.1, A-5.2, AND A-6.1: REMOVE THE REVISION CLOUDS AND THE TITLEBLOCK REVISION REFERENCE. THIS IS A FIRST REVIEW FOR THIS PROJECT.
9. SHEETS F-1.1, F-1.2, AND F-1.3: REMOVE THE REVISION CLOUDS AND THE TITLEBLOCK REVISION REFERENCE. THIS IS A FIRST REVIEW FOR THIS PROJECT.
10. SHEET F-1.2; PLANS A AND E: THESE SHOULD BE REFERENCED AS ROOF PLANS.
11. COVERWORX CALCULATIONS: FULL SIZE DRAWINGS (STAMPED/SIGNED/DATED) OF THE CAR WASH BUILDING MUST BE SUBMITTED, INCLUDING FOUNDATION PLAN, ROOF FRAMING PLAN, MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS, GENERAL NOTES, SECTIONS AND DETAILS. FOLLOW THE IBC SECTION 107 FOR SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS.
12. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
11/04/2013 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
11/04/2013 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.
2. Provide the sequence of operation for EF-2. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
11/04/2013 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied T13CM06405
5075 S Midvale Park Rd.
Arizona Auto Spa

1. The Car Wash Vendors Drawings are not sealed by an appropriate State of Arizona Professional such an Architect of Electrical Engineer.
In addition, the Vendors Drawings are to be submitted in compliance with 2012 The City of Tucson Commercial Submittal Requirements, see Electrical Requirements. Please review and apply requirements that pertain to that section.

Ray T Majuta
Elect Plan Review
PDSD, Tucson
11/5/2013
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov
520/837/4988
11/04/2013 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. The fixture unit method of calculating the instantaneous water demand for a plumbing system uses the probability of group of plumbing fixtures operating with differing flow rates and different use frequencies. Provide justification for including the continuous supply demand for the car wash equipment as part of the plumbing fixture unit calculation. Reference: Section 604.1 and E102.2.2, IPC 2012.
2. Clarify the size of the reduced pressure backflow preventer (RPBP) and the water service pipe. On sheet P-1 both are 3" but on sheet P-2, the RPBP is 2". Also, the water service on the civil plans shows a 2" RPBP and a 2" water service pipe. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
3. Provide information to show how proposed water heater WH-1 is to be supported from the building structure. Reference: Section 301.2, IPC 2012.
4. Show how the temperature of the hot water supply to the public lavatories is controlled (WH-2). Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1, IPC 2012 and Section C404.3, IECC 2012.
5. Show how contamination of the water distribution system due to connections to process equipment is prevented. (Also, correct detail 207 to show water piping, not compressed air piping.) Reference: Section 608.1, IPC 2012.
6. Clarify the type of water closet being installed. The Plumbing Schedule on sheet P-1 shows a flush valve water closet with a 1-1/2" water supply but with the fixture units of a tank-type water closet. Sheet P-2 (which shows a ¾" supply serving the water closet, lavatory, and a hose bibb) and the plumbing specifications on sheet P-4 which calls for a flush-tank water closet. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
7. With respect to detail 209, verify the wastewater treatment requirements with the Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (contact: Rusty Riccaboni, 724-6200) and clearly show the requirements on the drawing. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
8. Correct keynote #7 and the note for detail 209 to read "backwater valve" instead of backflow prevention. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
11/19/2013 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied The DP must be approved.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/26/2013 FERNE RODRIGUEZ OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
11/26/2013 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed