Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T13CM06341
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/24/2013 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/01/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET CS1.1; NOTE 1: PER THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIREMENTS, RACKS GREATER THAN 6 FEET IN HEIGHT AND UP TO 12 FEET IN HEIGHT MUST INCLUDE DETAILS ON THE DRAWINGS OF BRACING, BRACING CONNECTIONS, AND THE CONNECTION OF THE RACKS TO THE FLOOR SLAB. PROVIDE. 2. SHEET A1; WALL CONSTRUCTION TYPES: CONSTRUCTION TYPE 5 HAS A REFERENCE TO DETAIL */A4. RINISH THAT REFERENCE. 3. SHEET A1; WALL CONSTRUCTION TYPES: CLARIFY (WITH A NOTE ON THE DRAWINGS) THAT ALL NEW METAL STUD WALLS EXTEND TO THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE. 4. SHEET A4.1 (SECTION 2); SHEET S2.1 (DETAILS 2, 3, AND 5): A NOTE ON SECTION 2 AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PIPE RAIL POST INDICATES TO "SEE STRUCTURAL", WHILE THE STRUCTURAL DETAILS INDICATE TO "SEE ARCHITECTURAL FOR RAILING INFORMATION". REVISE ONE OF THESE. 5. SHEET A5; ELEVATION 4 AND DETAIL 5: DETAIL 5 REFERENCES 4/A5 FOR THE STEEL ANGLE FRAME SUPPORTING THE WATER HEATER, BUT NO SPECIFICS ARE PROVIDED. SHOW THE STEEL ANGLE SIZES AND CONNECTIONS TO THE WALL BLOCKING. 6. SHEET S1.1; DESIGN CRITERIA NOTE 1: REVISE THE NOTE LISTING THE 2009 IBC REFERENCE. 7. SHEET S1.1; SPECIAL INSPECTION NOTES: REVISE ALL SECTION AND NOTE REFERENCES THAT WERE USED UNDER THE 2009 IBC AND NOW MUST MEET THE 2012 IBC REQUIREMENTS (NOTES 2, 4A, ETC.). 8. SHEET S1.2; CONCRETE NOTE 1: REVISE THE NOTE LISTING THE 2009 IBC REFERENCE. 9. GENERAL: THERE ARE SEVERAL REFERENCES IN THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS TO THE 2009 IBC AND VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THAT EDITION. REVISE THOSE TO REFERENCE THE 2012 IBC. 10. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 11/08/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/08/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide tempered water for the lavatories and public hand-washing sinks using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. The Wilkins model ZW3870T is obsolete; it has been replaced with the ZW3870XLT, a lead-free product listed to ASSE 1070. Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012. 2. Provide structural calculations for the mounting shelf for the water heater to show that the water heater will be safely supported from the building structure. Reference: Section 301.2, IPC 2012. |
| 11/08/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The 2012 International Energy Compliance Code is the relevant energy code for this project. Based on the referenced code sections on sheet MP-1, the 2003 International Energy Compliance Code has been used. Specifically state the duct insulation requirements for this activity (i.e. simply noting "comply with the energy conservation code" is not acceptable). 2. ASHRA 62.1-2004 is not a referenced standard in the 2012 IMC. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation using the current code or show that the ventilation method used will result in air quality at least equivalent to the method shown in Section 403, IMC 2012. Reference: Section 403.2, IMC 2012. 3. Revise the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fan so that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted. Using motion sensors to control the fan can result in the exhaust fan being shut off while RTU-5 is still supplying air to the restrooms. The exhausted air from the restrooms shall be limited to no more than 10% of any subsequent supply air stream. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2012. |
| 11/12/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T13cm06341 2430 S Harrison RD #150 TI 1. Sheet E.3 Note below service"Contractor to verify existing service capacity is adequate". City of Tucson TI Submittal Requirements state the existing service load must be provided with TI plans, and also shown how obtained. 2. Identify the circuits for coolers and freezers and associated circuits on Sheet E1. Ray T Majuta Elect Plan Review PDSD, C of Tucson 11/12/2013 520-837-4988 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/19/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |