Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

The login landing page when selecting 'View' is still occurring and is still pending further investigation. 

Permit Number: T13CM06259
Parcel: 110035930

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T13CM06259
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/06/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied The submitted civil site plan shows the private sewer collection system that serves Puente Nuevo Plaza but it does not show any connection from the shell building. Include a civil plan with the building plan set that shows the size, route, and slope of the building sewer that connects to the private sewer collection system. [Second comment: Comment not resolved; on the shell drawings, only a short (about ten feet) section of the building sewer was installed. Show the size, route, and slope of the building sewer. Note that the shell drawings show the stub for the building sewer located about 28 feet north of the location shown on your plumbing drawing.] [Initial comment: Provide a site drawing showing the size, route, and slope of the building sewer and the location of its connection to the public sewer. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.]
02/07/2014 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Comment not addressed. [Second comment: The envelope compliance certificate shown on sheet G-001 is incorrect. It is based on a building located in Phoenix, Arizona that does not appear to be the same construction as the building at this address. The building area is incorrect, no continuous insulation has been used, the subject building does not have a basement, and the wrong energy code has been used. Section C406, IECC 2012 is also applicable to this activity. Complete the Envelope Compliance Certificate by checking the appropriate line items in Section 3, the Air Leakage, Component Certification, and Vapor Retarder Requirements. Provide the additional information requested in the initial comment.] [Initial comment: The building shell being modified in this activity does not appear to have been conditioned. Section C101.4.5, IECC 2012 requires the space to be brought into full compliance with the current energy code. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.]
2. Comment not addressed. [Second comment: The exterior design conditions were revised on sheet M100 but the load calculations have not been revised.] [Initial comment: Revise the HVAC load calculations, using the exterior design conditions specified by Section C302.1, IECC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.]
02/07/2014 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. PREVIOUS COMMENT 4; SHEET G-001; WALL TYPE DETAILS: FOR WALLS TERMINATING JUST ABOVE THE CEILING, PROVIDE A DETAIL ON THE DRAWINGS INDICATING HOW THE WALL IS BRACED, INCLUDING BRACING SIZE AND SPACING, AND THE CONNECTION OF THE BRACING TO THE STRUCTURE ABOVE AND TO THE TOP OF THE WALL. INCLUDE THE SIZE AND QUANTITY OF CONNECTORS.
2. PREVIOUS COMMENT 5; SHEET A-101; ACCESSIBLE DETAILS: A DIMENSIONED ELEVATION INDICATING THE CONTROL/HANDSHOWER LOCATION AND THE GRAB BARS IN THE SHOWER PER THE ICC/ANSI SECTION 608 WAS NOT PROVIDED ON THE DRAWINGS. AN 8 1/2 X 11 CUT SHEET SHOWING A PREFABRICATED SHOWER IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.
3. PREVIOUS COMMENT 10; SHEET A-104: THE REQUIREMENT FOR A MINIMUM TEXT SIZE OF 3/32" FOR THE CASEWORK GENERAL NOTES, CASEWORK KEYNOTES, CASEWORK NOMENCLATURE, CABINET AND CASEWORK NOTES, AND DETAILS 1 AND 2 KEYNOTE REFERENCES HAS NOT BEEN MET.
4. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
02/18/2014 FERNE RODRIGUEZ OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
02/18/2014 FERNE RODRIGUEZ REJECT SHELF Completed