Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - - 1ST
Permit Number - T13CM06046
Review Name: REVISION - - 1ST
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/11/2017 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The following is needed for Sewer Connection Fee Application Approval: A Type III capacity submittal (RWRWCapacityResponse@pima.gov) - Kurt Stemm - 520-724-6607 (Kurt.Stemm@pima.gov) Thank you, Gerry |
| 12/15/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The revised note for the metering faucet stipulates a "maximum" cycle time of 10-seconds; it should read "minimum" cycle time. [Initial comment: Provide metering faucets for the lavatories, dispensing a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. Verify that the faucet will operate for a minimum time of 10-seconds. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 606.4, ICC/ANSI A117.1-03.] 2. The soda guns (K-84 and K-103) do not indicate if they have backflow protection. [Initial comment: All appliances that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Section 608.13.1, IPC 2012 with a direct-connection to water shall be protected against backflow. Specify the device to be used for each appliance connection and show it on the riser diagram. (Water supply connections to beverage dispensers shall be protected with backflow preventers conforming to ASSE 1022.) Reference: Sections 608.15 and 608.16, IPC 2012.] 3. See detail 53/a9.3 and coordinate with the architect. [Initial comment: Verify that all of the vents (except for vents serving interceptors located outdoors) rise vertically to at least 6" above the flood rims of the fixtures they protect prior to running horizontally. Reference: Section 905.4, IPC 2012.] 4. Provide the dimensions of the scupper (keynote #11, sheet a3.2). Provide overflow protection for the roof over the main entrance. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012. [Initial comment: Provide roof drainage calculations based on the 100-year hourly rainfall rate for Tucson, 3" per hour. Reference: Sections 1106.1, 1106.4, and 1108.3, IPC 2012.] |
| 12/16/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. PREVIOUS COMMENT 10; SHEET a5.1: A REVISION TO DOOR 102a KEYNOTES INDICATES NOTES 1, 2, 3, AND 4. NOTE 1 INDICATES NO PANIC HARDWARE, WHILE NOTE 3 INDICATES PANIC HARDWARE. PLEASE COORDINATE. 2. PREVIOUS COMMENT 12; SHEET a3.2: THE SOUTH PORTION OF THE SCREEN WALL BETWEEN GRIDS c AND d AND BETWEEN GRIDS 1 AND 2 HAS A SECTION CUT THAT REFERENCES #/a9.#. PLEASE REVISE THE SECTION CUT REFERENCE. 3. PREVIOUS COMMENT 14; SHEETS a6.0, a6.1, a7.0, a8.0, AND a8.1 (FONT SIZE): THE FONT SIZE FOR SHEET a7.0 WAS REVISED TO 3/32" HEIGHT (FOR UPPER AND LOWER CASE), WHILE SHEETS a6.0, a6.1, a8.0, AND a8.1 WERE NOT REVISED. PLEASE REVISE. 4. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE TWO SETS OF ALL STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS. 5. GENERAL: THE ONLY STRUCTURAL DRAWING IN THIS SUBMITTAL WAS SHEET S1.6. PLEASE INCLUDE ALL STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. 6. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 12/16/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide a copy of the COMcheck Envelope Compliance Certificate for the addition to the building. Verify that the building components shown on the Envelope Compliance Certificate are clearly shown on the drawings. [Initial comment: Revise the energy code compliance for the addition to the building envelope using calculations based on the current code. Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.5, C103.2, C303, and C401.2.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.] |
| 12/22/2016 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approv-Cond |